Yes, if someone gets out of their car to scream at me, yes, that is an aggressive act and I would be on the defense.
I don't understand that reference but I'm certain that it's gay.
No you get to taunt all you want. This is mother fucking AMERICA, not the UK.
If you believe that someone is going to do you physical harm it doesn't matter if you use a god damn PLASMA CANNON on them, you have a right to defend your life.
This is such a ass-backwards concept. Why should the responsibility for not causing a fight over words fall on the one saying the words and not the one throwing hands? How do we decide which words specifically justify attacking someone like a wild animal and which doesn't? What if someone calls me a cracker? Does that justify me sucker punching them in the face?
Unless you think that assault in a reasonable response to "chimping out" in public I don't see why you and others feel the need to constantly point it out. Him being a nuisance streamer and him getting assaulted for saying "chimp out" are 2 separate things.
do you have legitimate fucking down syndrome he woudn't be doing any of this shit if he wasn't streaming and getting pennies thrown at him by people who wanted to see him get beat up
Him responding to a chimp out by breaking a law in his own state is a chimp out. Are you retarded?
all this verbal diarhea just to justify being a nuisance in a no law anarchy world you want people like chud would either shut up or people would gang up on him and beat his ass for irrepentatly disturbing othersI don't understand that reference but I'm certain that it's gay.
No you get to taunt all you want. This is mother fucking AMERICA, not the UK.
You are allowed to insult somebody even with racial slurs under the first amendment and they can't get physical with you if you don't threaten their lives.
If nigger would have you used what limited under 70 IQ he had, he would have recorded this dude and turned him into the police and he would have gotten in trouble for disorderly conduct.
The second the nigger tried to lay hands, he forfeited his right to life.
We live in the United States of America, and this is in the SOUTH. Some nigger doesn't get the flip the checkers board over just because you said "King me, nigger."
If you believe that someone is going to do you physical harm it doesn't matter if you use a god damn PLASMA CANNON on them, you have a right to defend your life.
He'll get away with this, it's just a dumb fuck Southern Democrat judge overreaching with his white guilt. Even if he gets convicted which I just don't see how it's going to happen it'll get overturned on appeal.
The nigger you are defending tried to burn his wife alive. When did Chud try to burn his wife alive? Monkey lovers have to lie about how bad niggers are to pretend that trying to burn your wife alive is on par with calling someone a mean word. Here's hoping every nigger lover in this thread gets lit on fire by a nigger like this White woman was (she also worshipped niggers btw).
Do you wanna be a nigger or be white? Behavioral only obviously. By the way you get so emotional over this subject we can tell you're brown, but with some proper behavior you can at least act properly enough to be welcomed into white society.
i can tell you about the time a white man got dug out by a black woman
You're just a fucking drongo and you don't understand what I'm saying. I'll talk to you like the niggers you admire so much because apparently you have the same low IQ and lack of comprehension skills as them;
Of course he did.
The nigger wasnt "fighting back" he was assaulting Chud.
It really shouldn't be that difficult to understand what I said.
So you can't list any times White men lit black women on fire, even as you lie and say that Chud acted like a nigger? That's because niggers are evil, and Chud is a human. Humans don't try to burn people alive, so Chud is objectively better than the mud demon you are desperately defending.
on one hand you say Chud was within his legal right to act like a nigger because muh 1st amnedment but then also make the concession his behavior would see him get charged for disorderedly conduct if it were presented to the police?
![:\](/styles/custom/emotes/svg/chris-confused.svg "Confused :\")
well it's his fucking thread pardon me for you not staying on topic
The number of people that don't understand that you can't just go "Ok, that's the 17th time he called me a nigger. I get to be violent now because the legal limit is 16" baffles my mind.
Niggers burn shit. When a White guy kills his wife he typically shoots her or stabs her to death.
Yes retard, because he was in the wrong being a nuisance and it might have been handled by a peace officer.on one hand you say Chud was within his legal right to act like a nigger because muh 1st amnedment but then also make the concession his behavior would see him get charged for disorderedly conduct if it were presented to the police?
That is an outdated state specific doctrine from before world war II.
well you fail to notice that you started off saying that it's completely legal to start shit with anyone and if anyone takes issue with it they get shot but because a bit of vigilante justice happened when calling the cops was insufficient for a man who woudn't stop until there was a "dead chimp on the pavement" you suddenly have to defend a white johnny somali
I didn't say it was legal to start shit, don't put words in my mouth. My argument is that you are not allowed to commit a serious felony in the face of somebody committing misdemeanour harassment.