💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Free Chud?

  • Free him, he a good boy who dindu nuffin

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Enjoy prison, Chud

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

Screenshot_20260518_195904_Chrome.jpg

So this account is claiming that chud is calling adin ross to post bail because he cant access his gosendgo account with out the phone the cops took and he will fight for free in brand risk if adin helps

The account also has other messages from chud and a link to a new givesendgo

Either someone is scamming retards to send money or chud is crying to adin ross.
 
Is there any reason to legally allow violence in response to words, other than to accommodate niggers?
How are you people so fucking dumb? Obviously is it NOT legal to respond to words with violence, but if you go around deliberately provoking violence, guess what? You're going to get some at some point. Is it legal? No. Will anyone sympathize with your stupid ass? Also no.
 
He was walking out of the courthouse for the so-called “dine and dash” (he got kicked out for being the nigger guy and then refused to pay. I don’t blame him) incident and the niggers outside the court room started laughing and pointing, according to Chud, and he responded by saying “you like my suit” and then kept walking. One of the niggers went up to Chud and told Chud not to play his nigger game with him cuz he ain’t the one. Chud kept walking away and the nigger then attacked him from behind. That was when Chud only shot him twice when he should’ve mag dumped the nog for nigging.
That he got followed is a claim which only featured in his account of the incident. Other bystander accounts (and the warrant) only state that he approached the group, got into an argument with one member (whilst reaching for his gun), and fired after they initiated the fight. Also, why wouldn't we conflate his content with this incident? He has a documented history of screaming "nigger" at niggers, and we know it's not just something he does for the camera because this all started after he used the slur during a road rage incident before his streaming career. The court's grave decision to charge him for ATTEMPTED MURDER tells me that the footage their outdoor surveillance cams recorded must be damning. There's no way Fox actually followed him down the street if the government felt it appropriate to level a charge that severe. They're not going to get that conviction but still.
 
Last edited:
It isn't legally allowed dumb shit. It does not mean however that can shoot dead anyone that swings at you, especially when you are obviously trying to get them to swing on you.

There really needs to be an IQ test to post on this forum. I guarantee you that every Dalton and Fuentes supporter would fail it.
You sound like a nigger and read like one too. Nobody can trick you into assaulting them you fucking ape, if you need laws to protect you from that you might be a nigger. In most of this country (at least the civilized parts that aren’t filled with retard gorilla niggers) you don’t get to swing on someone because you don’t like their language. The provocation would be taken into account but you wouldn’t automatically go away for murder/attempted murder over “fighting words”.

Also, I’d rather go find the troon bridge than be a Fuentes fag. Not everyone who hates niggers and thinks they’re a blight on society is brown or a gay pedophile. Nice use of that frontal lobe though champ.
 
How are you people so fucking dumb? Obviously is it NOT legal to respond to words with violence, but if you go around deliberately provoking violence, guess what? You're going to get some at some point. Is it legal? No. Will anyone sympathize with your stupid ass? Also no.
Old saying: don't write checks you can't cash. Believe it or not, I, a huwhite man could be provoked as well- and so could the rest of you. We're all animals at the end of the day. Eventually if you want a fight, you'll get one, and there is no guarantee you will win. People that say otherwise have not been hit. Chud got what he wanted.
 
How are you people so fucking dumb? Obviously is it NOT legal to respond to words with violence, but if you go around deliberately provoking violence, guess what? You're going to get some at some point. Is it legal? No. Will anyone sympathize with your stupid ass? Also no.
Genuinely concerning that so many of you don't understand how problematically stupid this position is. It's essentially the divide in this thread and is so fundamentally disconnecting that I wish KF had a feature to allow parallel threads on the same topic or something. It's like the demarcation line in the Charlie Kirk thread between, "Man, I can't believe the left's stochastic terrorism got a tranny-lover to murder Charlie" vs. "Okay, so here's what we know: Candance Owens hired an Israeli black ops group to perform this hit. Ask yourself: would the shadow on his neck truly appear 1 second BEFORE the 'bullet' (movie squib) hit him."

Maybe I'll build this feature into my KF extension or something. Users can assign thread-specific parallel tags to prune/build a more enjoyable thread lol
Old saying: don't write checks you can't cash. Believe it or not, I, a huwhite man could be provoked as well- and so could the rest of you. We're all animals at the end of the day. Eventually if you want a fight, you'll get one, and there is no guarantee you will win. People that say otherwise have not been hit. Chud got what he wanted.
God damn, you fucking faggots are so annoyingly dumb. What Chud wants is white people to not be justifiably attacked for exercising the rights white men setup for them to enjoy. When losers like you just go, "Well, what do you expect? The terrible state of things is indeed the state of things!" No shit. That's the entire issue that Chud wants addressed.

He didn't get a fight, nor want one. You clowns genuinely think this is a guy running his mouth, getting a fair warning that he's crossing the line, and leaving with a black eye that pales in comparison to the humbled ego. No, he was violently attacked by an absolute dreg of society and now he's in jail for attempted murder after LAWFULLY defending himself. And the bail is set at $37864679 because he's a white man while the same judge lets blacks murder whites over nothing and get bailed out ASAP.

If you were "provoked" into violently victimizing others for being offensive, you deserve to be put in jail. And if you're white, you would be. Nobody wants Chud to be able to shoot people for nothing, faggot. He didn't get his ass beat after starting a fight. He justifiably put holes in an animal trying to kill him and the wrong person is being punished, ffs.

Only an absolute idiot, black person, or average woman has your POV. People like you are tumbleweed blowing in whichever direction group consensus instructs you to. If your daughter passes out drunk in the worst part of town, her odds of being raped definitely go up. If that happens, you don't simply shrug and tell her, "What did you expect? You wanted attention and you got it." Sure, warn her and others about minimizing risk, but you still go find and kill the rapist, not provide the cushioning for them to justify raping again.

Since I know I'll get MATIs, I'm going to get my money's worth. You are a retarded faggot.
 
Last edited:
Is there any reason to legally allow violence in response to words, other than to accommodate niggers?
"Fighting words" are misunderstood. It has never been a greenlight for niggers to assault racists. It isn't a relevant doctrine in self-defense cases. There isn't any precedent of a violent nigger gets acquitted on the basis of being called a nigger (some killers have been convicted of manslaughter, but the circumstances were pretty muddy to begin with). Much to the chagrin of BLM & associates they go to prison all the time for battering or killing Crakkka ass racists. Kiwis have this idea that niggers never go to jail for all the crime they commit which is so laughably retarded
 
"Fighting words" are misunderstood. It has never been a greenlight for niggers to assault racists. It isn't a relevant doctrine in self-defense cases. There isn't any precedent of a violent nigger gets acquitted on the basis of being called a nigger (some killers have been convicted of manslaughter, but the circumstances were pretty muddy to begin with). Much to the chagrin of BLM & associates they go to prison all the time for battering or killing Crakkka ass racists. Kiwis have this idea that niggers never go to jail for all the crime they commit which is so laughably retarded
There was that one case this year where a crazed bum got away with stabbing a guy because the victim called him a nigger afterwards, but that was the Portland Area. That doesn't really apply to this case though. Chud made clear his desire to provoke a scenario where he could commit violence against a chimping nigger and claim self-defense, he got that scenario, and now he's finding out that provoking somebody into attacking you and being a general nuisance means that the law generally isn't going to side with you. Anybody claiming they have a right to scream slurs at niggers and shoot them for retaliating is in truth little better than a nigger themselves. He's not a “Savior of the White Race,” he's a loser trying to use claims of a higher cause to justify being a blight on civilized society.
 
Last edited:
TLDW: Chud the Builder is fucked. If there is a trial, it will be comprised of normies who do not consider Chud's behavior based.
This describes America being fucked because retards think saying mean words is "based" behavior for edgy teens and not a right we must fight hard to protect.

@Potentially Criminal

Why do you hold Chud to a different standard than the feral blacks assaulting him? The one he maced was in his personal space, saying something about being in Chud's mama's pussy. Why are we not considering them two grown men equally using their right to speak freely without someone else justifiably assaulting them in this scenario? I don't think Chud should've been able to mace him for saying that, even if I find it distasteful and annoying.

The black slaps Chud's hat off his head, which in my area is an extension of his body. It'd likely be 4th degree assault, giving Chud the legal right to pull out his mace in preparation for another assault, if not mace him immediately. Since the black walked off, I don't think macing him would be appropriate/legal then since it indicates de-escalation or an end to the confrontation, but I'm obviously allowed to prepare myself for another assault. I'm sure I'm also allowed to continue existing in public without a duty to retreat due to some faggot assaulting me.

In how many jurisdictions is it considered brandishing when someone assaults you and you prepare yourself to defend against a second attack? Where are you located where "touch me again!" is "provoking" or some leftoid term and not a lawful conditional threat that sets the boundary at, "If you assault me again, I am prepared to defend myself?"

Why is the onus on Chud to essentially remove himself from society so low-impulse retards can't wantonly assault him and attempt to disarm his lawful tools for self-defense? It just seems like every single point of opposition to Chud is basically, "Dude, we all know blacks are unhinged and violent. Therefore, we need different rules/expectations for us in society where whites are held to a higher standard than retarded blacks."

You know, the whole issue Chud is highlighting.
 
Last edited:
"Fighting words" are misunderstood. It has never been a greenlight for niggers to assault racists. It isn't a relevant doctrine in self-defense cases. There isn't any precedent of a violent nigger gets acquitted on the basis of being called a nigger (some killers have been convicted of manslaughter, but the circumstances were pretty muddy to begin with). Much to the chagrin of BLM & associates they go to prison all the time for battering or killing Crakkka ass racists. Kiwis have this idea that niggers never go to jail for all the crime they commit which is so laughably retarded
Exactly this. It's a mitigating factor.
This describes America being fucked because retards think saying mean words is "based" behavior for edgy teens and not a right we must fight hard to protect.

@Potentially Criminal

Why do you hold Chud to a different standard than the feral blacks assaulting him? The one he maced was in his personal space, saying something about being in Chud's mama's pussy. Why are we not considering them two grown men equally using their right to speak freely without someone else justifiably assaulting them in this scenario?

The black slaps Chud's hat off his head, which in my area is an extension of his body. It'd likely be 4th degree assault, giving Chud the legal right to pull out his mace in preparation for another assault. In how many jurisdictions is it considered brandishing when someone assaults you and you prepare yourself to defend against a second attack?
He ran away and Chud followed him, retard. Lmfao.
 
He ran away and Chud followed him, retard. Lmfao.
He assaulted Chud in public and ran off like a coward. Somehow, this doesn't cross into, "He got what he wanted" when Chud finally maces him in self-defense. Chud continued existing in public after the assault. Victims of an attack are not required to no leave public spaces after their victimization. We require those who assault others be penalized.

When the violent retard attempted to disarm the victim after the first assault, the victim lawfully sprayed his attacker with mace. Imagine thinking someone assaulting you and running away is a threshold for no longer having the right to self-defense or move freely. It should be legal to chase down and empty the can in his eyeballs.

Again, it's just nonstop female-coded talking points here. Women appease their attackers because they're women. To them, daring to not back down when someone assaults you is insane. Only in the America where women in positions of power have turned us into the Twilight Zone do we demand assault victims cede public space to their attackers.
Anybody claiming they have a right to scream slurs at niggers and shoot them for retaliating is in truth little better than a nigger themselves.
They are not retaliating against anything! You need to uninstall whatever leftoid "words are violence" propaganda has infected your brain immediately.
From what im reading on "fighting words" as applied in court,
The entirety of the concept of "fighting words" is a massive hole that attacks our fundamental rights. It needs to be abolished entirely as it allows violent retards to slide the bar for acceptable behavior. Anything tied to race and what the "average person" would do in a scenario is basically an anti-white ruling. We are letting feral monsters set the bar for what constitutes the right to murder people over their low-impulse feelings.

Society will tell white people that there's no equivalent to nigger for white people. Yeah, you know why? Because whites aren't violent, low-impulse, double-digit IQ retards with a less-developed PFC. So whites will continue to abide by laws and not chimp out over rights that only white men could/did build for us. And the few that do get to go to jail because the bulk of us still understand that's not acceptable. Meanwhile, the worst offenders in our society will be granted the freedom to murder whites because they're simply too stupid and worthless to understand or assimilate to our most sacred American rights.

If only leftoids who say "lmfao ok ya our biggest 'right' is shouting nigger in the street" were the ones getting murdered by chimpouts, that'd be one thing. But heaven, this place is not.

Anybody using the terms "instigated", "retaliated", "provoked" or similar should immediately be deported to Africa. These terms cannot apply to something as fundamentally American as offending someone with your thoughts. This is the divide. If whites aren't willing to die on that hill, we'll continue getting murdered on it. It's that simple.
 
Last edited:
Fighting words" are misunderstood. It has never been a greenlight for niggers to assault racists.
From what im reading on "fighting words" as applied in court, it can be a high bar to meet, but it's contingent on all of the circumstances. I haven't watched the incident so im not gonna assert anything factual about it, but as for fighting words, what we're looking at is whether what he said was yelled in close proximity in a threatening manner or combined with a physical posture or presentation of a weapon in a manner that the court would determine could cause an "ordinary person" (this means if you were in their shoes not whether the nigger chimped out) could believe they were in danger. Also so.e of chuds online postings, could POSSIBLY be construed as a kind of premeditation for murder. Niggers and touchy subjects aside, there is a precedent for locking up guys who carry around a gun and instigate fights while armed because they keep telling people that theyre gonna shoot someone if they give them shit. Whether chud is a serial instigator who fantisizes about being Paul kersey ill leave to the thread to bitch over endlessly but these are some things that will be in contention. As for our dear beloved wignats, what you fail continually to understand about black and minority tribalism as a strategy is it is only effective, or just not a complete deleterious failstate because it was preceded by the tacit consent of power. Whites in the south used the same approach right up until the bayonet were pointed at them and it did fuck all. Saul alinsky tactics only worked because power already gave it the green light. This was hashed out on firing line by a gay catholic in like the late 60s.
 
I find it interesting that when I check the thread in the morning there’s a majority of pro-Chud posts, but when I check the thread in the afternoon it’s all nigger love. Do the nigger lovers not have jobs, or are they posting on Tel Aviv time?
 
Nobody can trick you into assaulting them you fucking ape
if you were a low impulse low IQ individual you could certainly be provoked into doing so, not that it would justify assault but i don't think a jury is going to look favorable on you if the assault was precipitated by you saying the most heinous shit imaginable in what can be reasonably construed as you trying to egg someone on to do something stupid.
 
Why is the onus on Chud to essentially remove himself from society so low-impulse retards can't wantonly assault him and attempt to disarm his lawful tools for self-defense? It just seems like every single point of opposition to Chud is basically, "Dude, we all know blacks are unhinged and violent. Therefore, we need different rules/expectations for us in society where whites are held to a higher standard than retarded blacks."
if you were a low impulse low IQ individual you could certainly be provoked into doing so, not that it would justify assault but i don't think a jury is going to look favorable on you if the assault was precipitated by you saying the most heinous shit imaginable in what can be reasonably construed as you trying to egg someone on to do something stupid.
 
He assaulted Chud in public and ran off like a coward. Somehow, this doesn't cross into, "He got what he wanted" when Chud finally maces him in self-defense.
"Assaulted", yeah, on a technicality that would likely elicit eye-rolls from the police officers on the receiving end of such a report. You think the fact that it's under the same wide-spanning legal umbrella of "assault" as actual beatdowns means the legal system would perceive the hat slap in a remotely similar light? They wouldn't. And they shouldn't. Because that's fucking stupid. And how is it self-defense when he's no longer attacking you??? lmfao.

When the violent retard attempted to disarm the victim after the first assault, the victim lawfully sprayed his attacker with mace. Imagine thinking someone assaulting you and running away is a threshold for no longer having the right to self-defense or move freely. It should be legal to chase down and empty the can in his eyeballs.
He was running away, so no, it was not lawful. Do you think self-defense and revenge are the same thing? What the fuck?

Again, it's just nonstop female-coded talking points here.
You're just a bunch of effeminate eunuchs for... *looks at paper* not feeling threatened enough by a nigger's back to spray it with mace!
 
Back
Top Bottom