💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Free Chud?

  • Free him, he a good boy who dindu nuffin

    Votes: 37 39.8%
  • Enjoy prison, Chud

    Votes: 56 60.2%

  • Total voters
    93
Im pretty sure what the prosecution is going to go with to axe his whole self defense claim is a funny little law in Tennessee.
It's the whole "Fighting Words" clause.
Or what we call Talk shit get hit.
I'm interested in how this one is going to play out.
Inb4 but the constitution.
Yeah Tennessee is pretty dirty and doesn't give a fuck. I mean they're known for doubling down on being retarded when it comes to prosecution.
Looked into the 1000+ sober DUI charges that have been dropped in the last 2 years and they're finally getting federal lawsuits rolling in on them.
Tennessee's solution?
Pass a law where the state can't be sued for it's fuck ups 😆
There's a small chance Chud will beat the charges. He won't beat the ride though.
 
Nigger you are on KIWIFARMS DOT SAO TOME go join up with the DHS and at least get paid to larp
There is a problem with that:
Not saying you are, that bit was rhetorical. I have a feeling that as this case goes on there are going to be skeletons coming out of Dalton's closet, just like they did with Lang.

There really should be a thread for wignat cows.
I'm taking bets. I got money on sex pest shit.
 
If you are White & not siding with Dalton, you are part of the problem. It literally does not matter if you like him or not. Your thoughts on the prospects of his case also do not matter.
What does it mean to “side with Dalton” other than post on social media and donate to a gofundme? Do you not see he was a grifter and that your precious wignat movement isn’t real?
 
None of the people, not Chud, not Johnny Somali, have even remotely the level of brainpower required to "test" others or make some wider social statement. These are low IQ individuals with low IQ motivations (money), anything people try to read beyond that is just conjecture.
And this is pretty much the thing. If you go out and act like Johnny Somali, and deliberately seek out low IQ individuals, and try to provoke them into low IQ behavior, guess what? They will tard rage and engage in low IQ behavior. And you deliberately caused this.

And on top of that, you are yourself a low-IQ individual because who other than an incredibly stupid person would do this?
 
Is there any reason to legally allow violence in response to words, other than to accommodate niggers? I’m gonna feel dumb if this law is the opposite, and it’s from back in the good ole days when they wanted to legally allow beating up Basketball Americans for getting uppity. This just sounds like something for niggers or people who think like niggers. “Fighting words” is vague as fuck (even if calling a pavement ape a nigger in this case), who decides what falls under that? The south is a shithole and Scott Adams was right, just get away from them.
 
What does it mean to “side with Dalton” other than post on social media and donate to a gofundme? Do you not see he was a grifter and that your precious wignat movement isn’t real?
Dalton is not a genuine racist or white nationalist. At best, Dalton is someone who wants whites to have the same in-group solidarity and self-advocacy that US minorities like Arabs, Blacks, Asians, and Jews do. Frankly, as America ceases to become a predominantly white country, this racial consciousness will naturally develop among a greater portion of whites without his inept prompting. But that's besides the point. The point is that Dalton is someone who adopts the vocabulary and aesthetic of the disaffected racist more for its countercultural allure - far past its due date - than anything else. He's "racist" in the same sense that Nick Fuentes is: He'll talk the talk about biological realities, unfair double standards targeting White America, and the unrelenting WAVE of hate crimes perpetrated against whites, sure, but the reality is that he can only hate black people when he contemplates them as an abstract, generalized mass. He'd gladly befriend, fuck, and pay the individual blacks he encounters in his daily life if their character is to his liking. In reality the guy is just a deeply-troubled feather ruffler posing as an activist.
 
Is there any reason to legally allow violence in response to words, other than to accommodate niggers? I’m gonna feel dumb if this law is the opposite, and it’s from back in the good ole days when they wanted to legally allow beating up Basketball Americans for getting uppity. This just sounds like something for niggers or people who think like niggers. “Fighting words” is vague as fuck (even if calling a pavement ape a nigger in this case), who decides what falls under that? The south is a shithole and Scott Adams was right, just get away from them.

It isn't legally allowed dumb shit. It does not mean however that can shoot dead anyone that swings at you, especially when you are obviously trying to get them to swing on you.

There really needs to be an IQ test to post on this forum. I guarantee you that every Dalton and Fuentes supporter would fail it.
 

Screenshot_20260518_195904_Chrome.jpg

So this account is claiming that chud is calling adin ross to post bail because he cant access his gosendgo account with out the phone the cops took and he will fight for free in brand risk if adin helps

The account also has other messages from chud and a link to a new givesendgo

Either someone is scamming retards to send money or chud is crying to adin ross.
 
Is there any reason to legally allow violence in response to words, other than to accommodate niggers?
How are you people so fucking dumb? Obviously is it NOT legal to respond to words with violence, but if you go around deliberately provoking violence, guess what? You're going to get some at some point. Is it legal? No. Will anyone sympathize with your stupid ass? Also no.
 
He was walking out of the courthouse for the so-called “dine and dash” (he got kicked out for being the nigger guy and then refused to pay. I don’t blame him) incident and the niggers outside the court room started laughing and pointing, according to Chud, and he responded by saying “you like my suit” and then kept walking. One of the niggers went up to Chud and told Chud not to play his nigger game with him cuz he ain’t the one. Chud kept walking away and the nigger then attacked him from behind. That was when Chud only shot him twice when he should’ve mag dumped the nog for nigging.
That he got followed is a claim which only featured in his account of the incident. Other bystander accounts (and the warrant) only state that he approached the group, got into an argument with one member (whilst reaching for his gun), and fired after they initiated the fight. Also, why wouldn't we conflate his content with this incident? He has a documented history of screaming "nigger" at niggers, and we know it's not just something he does for the camera because this all started after he used the slur during a road rage incident before his streaming career. The court's grave decision to charge him for ATTEMPTED MURDER tells me that the footage their outdoor surveillance cams recorded must be damning. There's no way Fox actually followed him down the street if the government felt it appropriate to level a charge that severe. They're not going to get that conviction but still.
 
Last edited:
It isn't legally allowed dumb shit. It does not mean however that can shoot dead anyone that swings at you, especially when you are obviously trying to get them to swing on you.

There really needs to be an IQ test to post on this forum. I guarantee you that every Dalton and Fuentes supporter would fail it.
You sound like a nigger and read like one too. Nobody can trick you into assaulting them you fucking ape, if you need laws to protect you from that you might be a nigger. In most of this country (at least the civilized parts that aren’t filled with retard gorilla niggers) you don’t get to swing on someone because you don’t like their language. The provocation would be taken into account but you wouldn’t automatically go away for murder/attempted murder over “fighting words”.

Also, I’d rather go find the troon bridge than be a Fuentes fag. Not everyone who hates niggers and thinks they’re a blight on society is brown or a gay pedophile. Nice use of that frontal lobe though champ.
 
How are you people so fucking dumb? Obviously is it NOT legal to respond to words with violence, but if you go around deliberately provoking violence, guess what? You're going to get some at some point. Is it legal? No. Will anyone sympathize with your stupid ass? Also no.
Old saying: don't write checks you can't cash. Believe it or not, I, a huwhite man could be provoked as well- and so could the rest of you. We're all animals at the end of the day. Eventually if you want a fight, you'll get one, and there is no guarantee you will win. People that say otherwise have not been hit. Chud got what he wanted.
 
How are you people so fucking dumb? Obviously is it NOT legal to respond to words with violence, but if you go around deliberately provoking violence, guess what? You're going to get some at some point. Is it legal? No. Will anyone sympathize with your stupid ass? Also no.
Genuinely concerning that so many of you don't understand how problematically stupid this position is. It's essentially the divide in this thread and is so fundamentally disconnecting that I wish KF had a feature to allow parallel threads on the same topic or something. It's like the demarcation line in the Charlie Kirk thread between, "Man, I can't believe the left's stochastic terrorism got a tranny-lover to murder Charlie" vs. "Okay, so here's what we know: Candance Owens hired an Israeli black ops group to perform this hit. Ask yourself: would the shadow on his neck truly appear 1 second BEFORE the 'bullet' (movie squib) hit him."

Maybe I'll build this feature into my KF extension or something. Users can assign thread-specific parallel tags to prune/build a more enjoyable thread lol
Old saying: don't write checks you can't cash. Believe it or not, I, a huwhite man could be provoked as well- and so could the rest of you. We're all animals at the end of the day. Eventually if you want a fight, you'll get one, and there is no guarantee you will win. People that say otherwise have not been hit. Chud got what he wanted.
God damn, you fucking faggots are so annoyingly dumb. What Chud wants is white people to not be justifiably attacked for exercising the rights white men setup for them to enjoy. When losers like you just go, "Well, what do you expect? The terrible state of things is indeed the state of things!" No shit. That's the entire issue that Chud wants addressed.

He didn't get a fight, nor want one. You clowns genuinely think this is a guy running his mouth, getting a fair warning that he's crossing the line, and leaving with a black eye that pales in comparison to the humbled ego. No, he was violently attacked by an absolute dreg of society and now he's in jail for attempted murder after LAWFULLY defending himself. And the bail is set at $37864679 because he's a white man while the same judge lets blacks murder whites over nothing and get bailed out ASAP.

If you were "provoked" into violently victimizing others for being offensive, you deserve to be put in jail. And if you're white, you would be. Nobody wants Chud to be able to shoot people for nothing, faggot. He didn't get his ass beat after starting a fight. He justifiably put holes in an animal trying to kill him and the wrong person is being punished, ffs.

Only an absolute idiot, black person, or average woman has your POV. People like you are tumbleweed blowing in whichever direction group consensus instructs you to. If your daughter passes out drunk in the worst part of town, her odds of being raped definitely go up. If that happens, you don't simply shrug and tell her, "What did you expect? You wanted attention and you got it." Sure, warn her and others about minimizing risk, but you still go find and kill the rapist, not provide the cushioning for them to justify raping again.

Since I know I'll get MATIs, I'm going to get my money's worth. You are a retarded faggot.
 
Last edited:
Is there any reason to legally allow violence in response to words, other than to accommodate niggers?
"Fighting words" are misunderstood. It has never been a greenlight for niggers to assault racists. It isn't a relevant doctrine in self-defense cases. There isn't any precedent of a violent nigger gets acquitted on the basis of being called a nigger (some killers have been convicted of manslaughter, but the circumstances were pretty muddy to begin with). Much to the chagrin of BLM & associates they go to prison all the time for battering or killing Crakkka ass racists. Kiwis have this idea that niggers never go to jail for all the crime they commit which is so laughably retarded
 
"Fighting words" are misunderstood. It has never been a greenlight for niggers to assault racists. It isn't a relevant doctrine in self-defense cases. There isn't any precedent of a violent nigger gets acquitted on the basis of being called a nigger (some killers have been convicted of manslaughter, but the circumstances were pretty muddy to begin with). Much to the chagrin of BLM & associates they go to prison all the time for battering or killing Crakkka ass racists. Kiwis have this idea that niggers never go to jail for all the crime they commit which is so laughably retarded
There was that one case this year where a crazed bum got away with stabbing a guy because the victim called him a nigger afterwards, but that was the Portland Area. That doesn't really apply to this case though. Chud made clear his desire to provoke a scenario where he could commit violence against a chimping nigger and claim self-defense, he got that scenario, and now he's finding out that provoking somebody into attacking you and being a general nuisance means that the law generally isn't going to side with you. Anybody claiming they have a right to scream slurs at niggers and shoot them for retaliating is in truth little better than a nigger themselves. He's not a “Savior of the White Race,” he's a loser trying to use claims of a higher cause to justify being a blight on civilized society.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom