Accostus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2016
On Dan's trial, as an amateur lawyer, I'd have thought that the case would have been restricted to the facts concerning this matter, ie whether or not this minor genuinely felt threatened and had reasonable grounds to believe that Dan would make good on comments online (I haven't seen the comments), and that anything he might have said before or since wouldn't even be admissible.
But Dan mentions in his youtube "podcast" dated 12 April 2017 that Kim received a letter asking her to appear as a witness, so I don't know.
[Edited to remove redundant information]
But Dan mentions in his youtube "podcast" dated 12 April 2017 that Kim received a letter asking her to appear as a witness, so I don't know.
[Edited to remove redundant information]
Last edited: