Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Kosher Snake]

I see, so that explains it, why frivolous lawsuits in the west even happen
I can think of other incidents of such (Maddox and that Donkey Kong guy come to mind) and I assume same ish IFP guff
kinda scummy especially when this can totally be used just to get your target to hemorrhage money

 

[Useful_Mistake]

"Waste deep"?

Also read this:

Read point 5 and then 6. I think he's SO close to getting it it's not even funny. Acer, what if you're right, what if your opening brief was the thing that caused it? Hint hint, that doesn't mean that they think your brief had merit, that suggests quite the opposite.


Acer is conflating two different things. The appellate court is not trying to deny your first amendment right to petition the court, what they are concerned about is funding your appellate petition especially considering it seems frivolous.

You are conflating federal law with constitutional rights. If he made a reference to 14th, maybe I could see it, but he didn't.



I don't remember court appointing any lawyer to him, so I assume he's suggesting bypassing government-funding his lawsuit by government-funding his lawsuit in a different way. It is as funny as it is stupid.

 

[kcbbq]

Copyright isn't a constitutional right.

Article I, Section 8, clause 8 comes close in that congress has the power to create a copyright and patent system, which they have, but he doesn't really have a copyright claim here unless I'm mixing up which of the many, many, many lawsuits this is.

 

[AnOminous]

Article I, Section 8, clause 8 comes close in that congress has the power to create a copyright and patent system, which they have, but he doesn't really have a copyright claim here unless I'm mixing up which of the many, many, many lawsuits this is.

Well, that's an enumerated power. At least strictly interpreted, it would allow Congress to decline to do it. My personal opinion is that these powers were intended more to be in the nature of a command, but they don't use the "shall" language that usually accompanies such a command.

At the very least, I think Congress was expected to exercise its enumerated powers (which raises the question of why there are all these enumerated powers when current jurisprudence seems to be the Commerce Clause by itself means Congress can do anything it likes forever).

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stebbins v. Google LLC:

Spoiler: 56

 

[TurboNAS]

I wonder if anyone has paid his fees to get a copy of the unintentional livestream. He’s consumed hundreds of hours of court costs but so far the actual market value of the work is zero.

It’s not surprising that he’s so doggedly defending this one work rather than moving on and making more videos that could be monetized and dwarf the income from this loser livestream. He must be hoping to collect statutory damages from the case so he can finally show some income.

What would he spend it on? He’s not going to clean the hovel but maybe he’d get a new blue hat to celebrate? What do you folks think? Where does a Stebbins shop if he wins the legal lottery?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I wonder if anyone has paid his fees to get a copy of the unintentional livestream.

Doubt it, and now cree has reposted it for free:

 

[AnOminous]

Doubt it, and now cree has reposted it for free:

He looks like such a sad little twitching goblin. Any timestamps for turkey gobbling?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

He looks like such a sad little twitching goblin. Any timestamps for turkey gobbling?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stebbins v. Google LLC:
View attachment 5155083

Spoiler: 56

View attachment 5155085
View attachment 5155086

 

[AnOminous]

We know Stabby won't obey that order, but at least in theory, making something an actual court order makes it contempt to violate it.

 

[Counterfeit Obol]

"Waste deep"?

Have you seen the hovel he lives in?

 

[Dr. Henry Armitage]

Can't wait to read Stabbins response. He's probably in his room gobbling up a storm and angrily typing right now.

 

[TurboNAS]

Time to look into plane tickets to San Francisco, Stebbins. Haha these orders make it perfectly clear what he’s expected to do. So what do we get next? An emergency response to the critical emergency motion that’s a big emergency and you have to stop being mean to me too.

I‘m looking forward to the next deranged filing.

 

[Counterfeit Obol]

Time to look into plane tickets to San Francisco, Stebbins.

I know one way he can drop in:

Then again, using that method with the Arkansas Gobbler might constitute gravity bomb usage...

 

[ConSluttant]

Lol I love it when pro se litigants realize that just because their court fees get paid that doesn't mean they are getting to do these things literally for free. Go fund me time? I'll chip in a dollar for the lols

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stebbins v. Doe

Spoiler: 12

David Stebbins v. Karl Polano APPEAL

Docs not attached in PACER for some reason

 

[ConSluttant]

Ooop! David gonna be big mad! Any bets on how long of a response he will make to say that no the case has to be held in California? Or will be take the L and let the suit be dropped to file in Idaho? Personally I'm placing my money on 35 pages.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Personally I'm placing my money on 35 pages.

I say around 20 instead

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I say around 20 instead

I'd like to say 27. He hasn't written a good novella in a while.