Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[prolapsed_cranium]

you’d think Acer would manage to rub his two brain cells together and realise there’s a limit to how much you can push a man.

He's not smart enough to realize that eventually, someone will fuck back.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

you’d think Acer would manage to rub his two brain cells together and realise

No actually, I wouldn't think that

 

[Lake Cresva Diver]

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

View attachment 5330159

That is one angry turkey. Someone should get that turkey some hot dogs

 

[️ronic]

View attachment 5330159

Those kids are lucky they only had to hear Acertard.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

Right? What stops Cree from just swatting him until he dies/gets scared off? Acer is already trying to ruin Cree’s life, and it’s not like the feds have the swatting situation under control. I mean, Cree would never do it, he’s actually a good person, but you’d think Acer would manage to rub his two brain cells together and realise there’s a limit to how much you can push a man.

You're talking about a man child so up his own ass he thinks he can do as he pleases to others and if they dare lift a finger to block a blow then they are in the wrong. I was like this as a child but grew out of it and I recall a deeply autistic class mate who was like this, (Punched another student in the leg and blamed his hurt hand on that students leg being too tough) so it's not that crazy for me. This is what comes from a generation of men raised with a soft handed approach. They don't have any respect for how thin the veneer of civility can be in today's world.

 

[EmpGulcasa]

How the hell is he still able to file lawsuits at all? In what world does it make sense that he can just keep doing it at no personal loss to himself while costing whoever he targets a fortune just to show they did nothing wrong? I don't understand this system.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Acerthorn filed two copyright claims against Creetosis, a defendant in Stebbins v. Rebolo.
View attachment 5326742
Creetosis deleted every video talking about Acerthorn to prevent another strike. Last month another critic's Youtube channel was terminated after Acerthorn submitted three strikes.

The two struck videos
COPE -- SEETHE -- MALD (Acerthorn Crying About Elden Ring)
STAG #34: Arrival? -- Covering Acerthorn's Absurdly Terrible Dark Souls "Retrospective"

Stupid question, but could the act of lodging a copyright claim with Youtube against another user/channel be viewed as violating the filing injunction? Technically it is a sworn legal copyright act. And it involves Google/Youtube/Alphabet. A case could possibly be made that he needs court pre-approval to even lodge a copyright strike.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stupid question, but could the act of lodging a copyright claim with Youtube against another user/channel be viewed as violating the filing injunction? Technically it is a sworn legal copyright act

This is something that has occurred to me to. I think Youtube is allowed to ignore these claims/DMCA requests (using the injunction as a reasoning), but I think that this interpretation is far broader than what the judge had intended.

 

[Adr1anD]

Stabbins filed a new entry in vs. @ZellZander case.
"MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT SERVICE OF PROCESS BY EMAIL"

Spoiler: images

Spoiler: recording from page 1

Interesting thing I noticed when pulling up his YouTube to monitor for the (hopeful) reeeeeee-sponse, his YouTube "About" page opens with this sentence:
"Hilarious let's plays, informative exploit demonstrations, and in-depth story analysis!"

But apparently Brave search (not Google though) has a cached version that is slightly different... (emphasis in original)
"I'm a fatass who lives like a slob, and I'm not ashamed to admit it! Hilarious let's plays, informative exploit demonstrations, and in-depth story analysis!"

I don't know if Brave's blurbs or summaries are weenable, but that opener feels like it rides the line real hard between something a troll would work in somehow thinking it's funny and something Acerthorn would add thinking he's being relatably self-deprecating before realizing that he's just pointing out his own flaws and removing it.

No, it was a ploy to make all youtube people he added in amended complaint here cover him so he can gain more views and have a way to obtain their adress for dmca purposes.
How would i know? He sent this email openly inviting those people to do it, EnclaveEmily was the primary receiver.

Acerthorn filed two copyright claims against Creetosis, a defendant in Stebbins v. Rebolo.

Here's remainder (comments) of his response (archive) to that community post:

Spoiler: images

 

[DiggieSmalls]

I would get a lot of schadenfreude if this guy got punched in his skeevy face.

 

[Meat Target]

Acerthorn emailed Creetosis, a defendant in Stebbins v. Rebolo, a legal threat stating "deleting your videos about me isn't going to save you. You're getting sued and there's no two ways about it."
View attachment 5328245
"Put your money where your mouth is."

If you are reading this, David: you are a worthless, vindictive, parasitic fat fucking cunt. You should be arrested for stealing oxygen, scarce resources, and space.

 

[AnOminous]

This is something that has occurred to me to. I think Youtube is allowed to ignore these claims/DMCA requests (using the injunction as a reasoning), but I think that this interpretation is far broader than what the judge had intended.

I'm pretty sure the injunction would only be triggered upon the actual filing of a lawsuit after denial of the pseudo-DMCA process YouTube uses. Or for that matter, upon filing a total lolsuit even AFTER YouTube actually upheld the strike.

If you are reading this, David: you are a worthless, vindictive, parasitic fat fucking cunt. You should be arrested for stealing oxygen, scarce resources, and space.

He should be arrested, imprisoned and executed for felony autistic turkey gobbling.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

People like Acerthorn are a prime reason that you should learn to hide your identity when creating videos for the site. There are ways to do it so poor fags like Acer have to go through multiple hoops to get it and he doesn't have the money or the knowledge to get it.

 

[TurboNAS]

I wonder if Zellzander can use the recent vexatious litigant ruling to shut down this action. Best not to do anything until service is complete, but that may be a way to halt some of the nonsense Stebbins typically files.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I wonder if Zellzander can use the recent vexatious litigant ruling to shut down this action. Best not to do anything until service is complete, but that may be a way to halt some of the nonsense Stebbins typically files.

The lawsuit was filed before this decision, so while he can notify the court that this should be considered, he can’t use it as an outright dismissal.

 

[Meat Target]

He should be arrested, imprisoned and executed for felony autistic turkey gobbling.

Once again, as I scroll up from the bottom of the page, I can tell a post is yours before I see your name on it.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Pretty sure David eats more glizzy's than Kevin and deep throats.

To commemorate all his failures though, someone should buy him some of these

https://www.today.com/food/news/oscar-mayer-hot-dog-straw-rcna101434

 

[Adr1anD]

I have learnt that litigious wereturkey has been featured in an educational/precautionary book.
Amazon says it would cost me 40 euros to get it (which I will not).

Spoiler: This is its cover

Some previews were available and this is the most important one:
Book calls his Virginia Tech Incident threat a "conditional ultimatum".

Spoiler: Excerpt (image)

 

[MongolianMongoose]

Stebbins v. Google #75 Order To Show Cause

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendants’ inquiry to “identify all recordings of conversations between [plaintiff] and counsel...
Plaintiff is FURTHER ORDERED to file an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, that he has complied with the Court’s order by deleting all copies of those recordings...
Plaintiff is further ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why sanctions should not be imposed for bad faith conduct.
Sanctions may include monetary penalties and/or dismissal of this action with prejudice.
The Court invites Defendants to immediately submit their billing records for time spent attempting to enforce the Court’s August 31, 2023 Order.

I can't imagine how he'd react to be sanctioned. Maybe he'll go off the deep end like Patrick Tomlinson.