Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 185 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.5%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,259 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,243
yah I agree. As long as Stabby has his You Tube channel he will use it to try to get rich by suing Google and other people over false copyright claims. Jew Tube should just ban his ass, crush the resulting lawsuit by citing their TOS right to cancel and deny any service for any reason and tell Stabby to get fucked. There is no way the pennies Stabby brings in in ad revenue is worth even a single hour of legal costs for Google.

Cancel the fucktards account and 90% of their headaches will go away.
I think a better move would be a snarky ToS change. "Should you be be actively engaged in a lawsuit with YouTube, Google, or Alphabet Inc as the opposition your accounts, with the exception of Gmail, will be temporarily disabled until the case is resolved. Avoiding this through alternative accounts will result in an unilateral banning from all YouTube, Google, and Alphabet Inc services without appeal or possibility for reversion. Up to and including IP level banning from site access." Leave Gmail so the fuckers can dig their holes and conduct normal business so it doesn't look like you're trying to shut a person off from operating online as punishment for using a constitutional right while also maniacally laughing as people like Stebbins delete themselves over and over. They can claim it is because they are mitigating liability by ceasing business relationships with others until the case is resolved. Make a show of the fact that even if YouTube loses the case they restore the accounts then call it done.
 
Stebbins v. Doe, et al. (9th circuit appeal that I can see again)
Screenshot 2024-12-09 180246.png
Screenshot 2024-12-09 180317.png
Ironically, despite him claiming he filed an "Exhibit A", no such exhibit was attached or filed
 

Attachments

Stebbins v. Doe, et al. (9th circuit appeal that I can see again)
View attachment 6733443
View attachment 6733446
Ironically, despite him claiming he filed an "Exhibit A", no such exhibit was attached or filed
Fucking mong can't even take the one undeserved win he got and be happy with it, he has to go for the whole pie and risk pissing off the judge by calling him contradictory.

Judge should just say "You are right, I should be more consistant. All three claims are hereby now denied". :smug:
 
A new spree of filings by the lawsuit maniac.

Stebbins v. Rebolo 37
Acerthorn asks the Court if, by requesting a third amended complaint, they're "maliciously" trying to trick him into abandoning his right to appeal the Court's dismissal of claims against SidAlpha, Rebolo, ect.
View attachment 6719862
Stebbins v. Rebolo 38
UN
CLEAN HANDS. Acerthorn asks the Court provide reason for the dismissal of claims against SidAlpha and Rebolo whose hands are unclean.
View attachment 6719860
Stebbins v. Rebolo 39
Asks the Court to stay the deadline for his third amended complaint until after the above two filings are addressed.
View attachment 6719859
Updates:
Screenshot 2024-12-09 231154.png
 

Attachments



Now this is classic Stabby! Playing semantics with the letter of the law while obviously acting in bad faith but expecting the court to rule in his favor as if it's nothing more then a machine.

1. Paypal is not legal Tender!! Sez who? Sez David of course and since David said it that's it. "Period. The End. Simple As That. Bottom Line.
2. Since PayPal is not legal tender then the payments made by it were not in fact payment but instead "personal gifts" and as such the Defendant has not complied with the settlement agreement because no "payments" have been made.
3. Thus the court MUST FIND the Defendant in contempt of court and this owes David 1 Gazilion Dollars.

*chefs kiss* perfect!
 
Now this is classic Stabby! Playing semantics with the letter of the law while obviously acting in bad faith but expecting the court to rule in his favor as if it's nothing more then a machine.

1. Paypal is not legal Tender!! Sez who? Sez David of course and since David said it that's it. "Period. The End. Simple As That. Bottom Line.
2. Since PayPal is not legal tender then the payments made by it were not in fact payment but instead "personal gifts" and as such the Defendant has not complied with the settlement agreement because no "payments" have been made.
3. Thus the court MUST FIND the Defendant in contempt of court and this owes David 1 Gazilion Dollars.

*chefs kiss* perfect!
Seems to me if Stabby wants to treat the payments as a business transaction then he should cover the fees, just like any other business using PayPal.
 
Classic Wereturkey actions all across the board. The man is easily the biggest legal douchebag I've ever seen. I love the 'proposed' orders commanding jackbooted court-enforcers to kick down the doors at Alphabet and some rando's house both, seizing hard drives and IDs with all legal possible force. At the same time calling the judge bias and dishonest who dosen't understand the doctrine of 'unclean hands'.

Not to mention attempting to grift $100 off of Jerrod as a 'gift' of what was obviously payment money, all because he can't wait a couple days to avoid a payment surcharge. What a cockweasel.
 
You know if Stabby had just stuck to harassing big corporations and the Feds I would probably have been a fan of his. His legal shenanigans are pretty damn entertaining for their combined sheer hubris, pomposity and idiocy. It's rare to find a moron who can string those 3 facets together successfully.

But he just had to stab his father in the face and start suing ordinary people who just happened to have the misfortune to come across his path and thus became the fat gobbling sack of shit we know and hate today.

ah, the path not taken!
 
He paid me, but I don’t like how he paid me and I’m going to neglect to document the payment so I look sketchy and also you cannot force me to Do. Anything. Period.

I control this settlement! I am the Alpha and the Omega and only using those means of payment I specifically authorize (whether or not they were laid out in the settlement agreement hereafter referred to as THE CUDGEL). This court MUST make Zell abide by my interpretation of The Cudgel or he must pay all the money forever and the court has to pay and then they’ll all pay! All of them!!
(Insane gobbling noises. Message ends.)
 
I'd show up at his home to deliver 10,000 legal tender pennies in person just like Acerthorn asked and record the madman's gobbling.
* 10,000 legal tender pennies covered in oil

if he wants to spend them he has to pay more than value to get them cleaned but they are still legal tender :^)
 
Last edited:
At this point, Zander might as well ask the court to dismiss the agreement. Likelihood is probably not high, but the court is now more than aware that Acerthorn is taking every effort to be non-compliant/force Zander to be non-compliant/attempt to trick all the parties and the court. No agreement can't stand like that.
 
Back