Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Zell really making this thread into pure autism from his crappy and uninteresting shit posting, lmao.
Or maybe he is for real. He bores me so much, I can barely tell anymore.
Lots of ignorant retards support that stuff. That doesn't make him a pedophile, just someone among the ~50% of this stupid country that blindly believes this bullshit. His political takes are definitely full retard though.
I personally never said he was one.
But I can't blame others for believing strongly in that possibility knowing the history of such people.
Whether he is one or not, people who unironically support such things involving children are corrupting societies with their filth, and often ruin lives as a result.
 
Last edited:
https://archive.ph/0jy4A
piccc.png
 
Just be careful, Acerthorn has experience in combat, just ask his father.

I was planning that Acerthorn and I settle our differences via combat armed with Knives in the Harrison, AR court room. He'd have the advantage of knives and only needing to travel the couple of blocks so it wouldn't be too much of an inconvenience to him.

But since that is no longer on teh table, I'd share my brilliance, or lack of, when it came to that strategy. Back to fucking off I go.
 
I was planning that Acerthorn and I settle our differences via combat armed with Knives in the Harrison, AR court room. He'd have the advantage of knives and only needing to travel the couple of blocks so it wouldn't be too much of an inconvenience to him.

But since that is no longer on teh table, I'd share my brilliance, or lack of, when it came to that strategy. Back to fucking off I go.
Dueling is illegal in the State. Has been for quite a while. You would know this if you took the time to check and read things instead of being hellbent being more retarded than David. I guess not shutting up while your name is on the chopping block is better use of your time. A Mega Corperation isn't going to step in front of you in your lawsuit like they did with the other Youtubers because Acerthorn forced their hand so similar cases wont rise up. You're a complete unknown in a simple copyright case. You're on your own and people here will just laugh at your stupidity. maybe try and beg that moron SidAlpha to help out. Here's a little for you though since I'm being a little generous. He wont.
 
Dueling is illegal in the State. Has been for quite a while. You would know this if you took the time to check and read things instead of being hellbent being more retarded than David. I guess not shutting up while your name is on the chopping block is better use of your time. A Mega Corperation isn't going to step in front of you in your lawsuit like they did with the other Youtubers because Acerthorn forced their hand so similar cases wont rise up. You're a complete unknown in a simple copyright case. You're on your own and people here will just laugh at your stupidity. maybe try and beg that moron SidAlpha to help out. Here's a little for you though since I'm being a little generous. He wont.
Come on, buddy, he's shitposting.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The News Crews
I was planning that Acerthorn and I settle our differences via combat armed with Knives in the Harrison, AR court room. He'd have the advantage of knives and only needing to travel the couple of blocks so it wouldn't be too much of an inconvenience to him.

But since that is no longer on teh table, I'd share my brilliance, or lack of, when it came to that strategy. Back to fucking off I go.
Okay, this one's actually a funny shit post. Lmao. Keep it up.
 
In video Sid says Stabbins made a new 6 hour livestream rant.
It wasn't. It was old video (that i accidentally found out about) copied and pasted and then he tried to garner attention and praises for 6 hour work he didnt do (that day) lmao
Only new is 3 minute rant about loss and he even kept old intro intact
 

Starts in 20 min
One interesting thing in there. Sid may be in an interesting position to bring some hurt on Stabbins. The cases were closed. Judgement Finalized. Without Sid Alpha etc ever needing to respond. Because their case had been put on hold pending the outcome of the related case. But acer filed a new motion challenging the ruling (plus flinging monkey poo at the judge etc). Sid Alpha has already paid a retainer in this matter, and has some GFM legal bills cash to burn. While he can't likely bring a lawsuit to have Acer declared a vexatious litigant, he sure as shit can file a response in this case now that Acer is seeking to keep filing shit in it. He can make a motion asking for legal fees. He can ask that the defendant be declared vexatious or otherwise sanctioned. He can even present the case Acer filed against @Zellander AFTER receiving this judgement as evidence that sanctions are warranted as Acer is just not stopping with the legal bullshit.

Sid's got a legal warchest to spend a bit of. He's got a lawyer that he has already paid. he's got good motive to do it. And Acer has fucked up to the point where there is nothing he could do to stop it or prevent it at this point. Heck Stabbin's own In Forma Pauperis filings make it clear that most reasonable sanctions will not work on him. He's got like $3.50 to his name and no assets worth touching without Hazmat gear and a flame thrower. So what sanctions can the court realistically bring besides some pre-filing review or outright Vexatious Status?
 
he sure as shit can file a response in this case now that Acer is seeking to keep filing shit in it. He can make a motion asking for legal fees. He can ask that the defendant be declared vexatious or otherwise sanctioned. He can even present the case Acer filed against @Zellander AFTER receiving this judgement as evidence that sanctions are warranted as Acer is just not stopping with the legal bullshit.
This is stupid. The case is closed, and Sid suffered zero harm as a result. "Ask for legal fees" what legal fees? The several hundred usd he might have spent in the two talks with his lawyer that resulted in nothing? If this retainer was recoverable, Acerthorn still is broke. He'd be spending thousands of dollars for essentially no gain, that's without even considering that such motions might be improper for a party that hasn't turned over any documents, been served, or filed any motions or responses before asking for damages it might not even be able to recover.

Yes, I want Acer to be punished, no Sid is clearly not the man to do it. The case is over, as you yourself said.
 
This is stupid. The case is closed, and Sid suffered zero harm as a result. "Ask for legal fees" what legal fees? The several hundred usd he might have spent in the two talks with his lawyer that resulted in nothing? If this retainer was recoverable, Acerthorn still is broke. He'd be spending thousands of dollars for essentially no gain, that's without even considering that such motions might be improper for a party that hasn't turned over any documents, been served, or filed any motions or responses before asking for damages it might not even be able to recover.

Yes, I want Acer to be punished, no Sid is clearly not the man to do it. The case is over, as you yourself said.
Filing a spurious DMCA is a crime. And Sid couldn't cover Acer's ass during the lolsuit, so lost ad revenue.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Sid Alpha has already paid a retainer in this matter, and has some GFM legal bills cash to burn. While he can't likely bring a lawsuit to have Acer declared a vexatious litigant, he sure as shit can file a response in this case now that Acer is seeking to keep filing shit in it.
You don't file a separate lawsuit to have someone declared a vexatious litigant (at least not in federal court). You file a motion.
Filing a spurious DMCA is a crime. And Sid couldn't cover Acer's ass during the lolsuit, so lost ad revenue.
There's also a little-used provision of the DMCA specifically shifting attorney fees in such cases, 17 U.S.C. § 512(f):
(f)Misrepresentations.—Any person who knowingly materially misrepresents under this section—
(1)
that material or activity is infringing, or
(2)
that material or activity was removed or disabled by mistake or misidentification,
shall be liable for any damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, incurred by the alleged infringer, by any copyright owner or copyright owner’s authorized licensee, or by a service provider, who is injured by such misrepresentation, as the result of the service provider relying upon such misrepresentation in removing or disabling access to the material or activity claimed to be infringing, or in replacing the removed material or ceasing to disable access to it.
This explicitly authorizes fee-shifting in such cases. So far as I know, only the Northern District of California has actually used this statute (most notably in a case involving crooked voting machine company Diebold using DMCA to cover up evidence of their criminal fraud).
 
Filing a spurious DMCA is a crime. And Sid couldn't cover Acer's ass during the lolsuit, so lost ad revenue.
Your name is very apt for reasons which may be beyond you to grasp.

Anyway, One, Sid DID cover Acer during the lawsuit. He literally made several videos about Acer during the lawsuit.

Two, crimes are for criminal courts, not civil ones.
 
This is stupid. The case is closed, and Sid suffered zero harm as a result. "Ask for legal fees" what legal fees? The several hundred usd he might have spent in the two talks with his lawyer that resulted in nothing? If this retainer was recoverable, Acerthorn still is broke. He'd be spending thousands of dollars for essentially no gain, that's without even considering that such motions might be improper for a party that hasn't turned over any documents, been served, or filed any motions or responses before asking for damages it might not even be able to recover.

Yes, I want Acer to be punished, no Sid is clearly not the man to do it. The case is over, as you yourself said.
He, an unrelated third party still had to protect himself from Acers predations and engage with a lawyer. He had costs that he otherwise would not have incurred. So yes he was harmed.

And the beauty is if he requests costs he can also request an appeal bond. Which broke ass Acer cannot meet. Thus bringing an end to it. He's already spent the money on the lawyer. There's no reason not to take the shot. I wouldn't say start filing new motions to reopen the case. But Acer already did that. A single filing requesting an ending fees and sanctions in response is not unreasonable.
 
A single filing requesting an ending fees and sanctions in response is not unreasonable.
It is unreasonable for a party that hasn't taken a single action in the lawsuit, much less been served. And, besides, it's quite literally a waste of his money since he won't recover anything. He could request sanctions, but likewise that's probably just a waste. The judge made it pretty clear that despite everything Acerthorn doesn't deserve sanctions unless he does something more.
 
It is unreasonable for a party that hasn't taken a single action in the lawsuit, much less been served. And, besides, it's quite literally a waste of his money since he won't recover anything. He could request sanctions, but likewise that's probably just a waste. The judge made it pretty clear that despite everything Acerthorn doesn't deserve sanctions unless he does something more.
And he did something more, immediately on receipt of that judgement. He filed more motions in the two dismissed lawsuits and he filed a third similar lawsuit.

Normally I would agree that its not worth it. But in this case Sid Alpha has already spent a retainer. He does have legitimate harrasement. Acerthorne attempted to maliciously harm his business through fraudulent lawfare. For which he incurred costs. He did not make any filings because the case in which he was named was on hold. It is no longer so, and Acer has motioned to set asside the dismissal and given clear intentions he plans to appeal.

Under the circumstances Sids most cost effective move is to burn his already paid for retainer to use Acers idiotic filing as cause to file a short succinct response requesting sanctions. Like I said he will never see a dime from Dildo Stabbins. But a ruling of fees makes an appeal bond likely. Which is a further method to end the abuse.

Acer causes so much trouble via the courts because his bullshit typically goes unanswered. With one brief response filing that he has already paid for Sid Alpha has the chance to end the Acer gamesmanship.
 
And he did something more, immediately on receipt of that judgement. He filed more motions in the two dismissed lawsuits and he filed a third similar lawsuit.

Normally I would agree that its not worth it. But in this case Sid Alpha has already spent a retainer. He does have legitimate harrasement. Acerthorne attempted to maliciously harm his business through fraudulent lawfare. For which he incurred costs. He did not make any filings because the case in which he was named was on hold. It is no longer so, and Acer has motioned to set asside the dismissal and given clear intentions he plans to appeal.

Under the circumstances Sids most cost effective move is to burn his already paid for retainer to use Acers idiotic filing as cause to file a short succinct response requesting sanctions. Like I said he will never see a dime from Dildo Stabbins. But a ruling of fees makes an appeal bond likely. Which is a further method to end the abuse.

Acer causes so much trouble via the courts because his bullshit typically goes unanswered. With one brief response filing that he has already paid for Sid Alpha has the chance to end the Acer gamesmanship.
I can see we fundamentally disagree. That being said, do you think Sid will actually do something?
 
I can see we fundamentally disagree. That being said, do you think Sid will actually do something?
I'm not saying he should go all Stabbin's 2.0. I simply said he should consider filing a single motion in arguing against Acer's motion for reconsideration and requesting sanctions. because it is obvious that Stabbin's is never ever going to stop until he is formally stopped. Warning him about Sanctions and Vexatious Status does nothing. Just like every other cow. Sid hasn't had to file anything because his portion of the case was paused pending resolution of the other case. I'm honestly not sure if he was served or not. But he is a named defendant, which means he has a right to respond.

As far as will Sid Alpha do anything? Who knows. he has a touch of internet autist about him as do all Youtubers. I would like to think he will follow his lawyers advise on it. He's also sitting in that weird point of Internet/Legal Bloodsports. When sued he opened up a GFM. He's got $30,000 in a legal defense fund. Which his (likely standard unhinged lunatic gamers) audience expects him to use to go all nuclear on Acerthorne and his antics. Which sadly and absurdly is a driving motivation in the modern world. I don't think it's one that the courts would care much for. But it certainly isn't worse than using the Federal Courts and Copyright Laws to rain hellfire on those who offend you on the internet. In Forma Pauperis.
 
Back