Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Enclave Emily]

View attachment 4233198
That was the important bit. It is a confirmation that Zell was served, something the docket previously had not reflected. I don't particularly care about the other part, given that YT was already served (docket 20). Though, the date does interest me, as technically it is impossible since the court only found out his identity on January 4th. Maybe the clerk knows something we don't, maybe it's a clerical mistake. I factually reported what was written on the docket

Can't say much, but what i will say is that Acerthorn is officially suing his second ghost

 

[okirrat]

If anything may this serve as a cautionary tale for new users to why having good opsec is important

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Can't say much, but what i will say is that Acerthorn is officially suing his second ghost

You really can't tell anything more?

 

[Acertard]

Btw Zell is on Creetosis' Discord currently, but I'm sure some of you guys already know that. May send screenshots later on what he's been saying.

 

[No Batty Boys in Jamaica]

Acerthorn is suing the wrong person. I, Barack Hussein Obama, am responsible for all of those posts. He can reach my legal team at http://www.whitehouse.com

If anything may this serve as a cautionary tale for new users to why having good opsec is important

Reminder that a guy was arrested for sending a gif to Kurt Eichenwald. If he had simply not phoneposted and hid behind 7 proxies before telling a filthy kike that he deserves a seizure, this would’ve been avoided.

Sent from my Samsung Smart Fridge with Tapatalk.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

It's an argument that makes sense, so of course it's not how copyright law works. At least I've never seen such an argument prevail, although many people in similar situations have made it.

I'm not fan of a lot of the copyright system (especially the way it was captured by Disney) but allowing people to post otherwise non-transformative works in their entirety as long as they write "FOR DISCUSSION- NO SUING ALLOWED" under them would basically allow anything online where someone can put a fig leaf of a 'discussion' next to (but not in) the work.

 

[AnOminous]

I'm not fan of a lot of the copyright system (especially the way it was captured by Disney) but allowing people to post otherwise non-transformative works in their entirety as long as they write "FOR DISCUSSION- NO SUING ALLOWED" under them would basically allow anything online where someone can put a fig leaf of a 'discussion' next to (but not in) the work.

True, but in this case, the whole "work" is part of an ongoing discussion and the clown who made a fool of himself in it wants to prevent discussion, not prevent economic loss to himself. I think copyright infringement should be limited to actual damages, not absurdly inflated statutory damages based on bogus public policy, and they shouldn't be a free smorgasbord for lawyers for, again, bogus public policy reasons (attorney fee awards routinely exceed anything remotely connected to the value of the work even in cases with rock bottom statutory damages that are the copyright equivalent of "fuck you you get a dollar" from a jury).

If someone wants to assert unreasonable levels of control over what is essentially an entirely worthless work, they should do it on their own dime.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

I think that vexatious litigants should lose their rights to forma pauperis. It would sure as hell cut down on the number of frivolous lawsuits.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Btw Zell is on Creetosis' Discord currently, but I'm sure some of you guys already know that. May send screenshots later on what he's been saying.

I like how he continues to be a dumbass and not shut up.

 

[The News Crews]

wanted to check the thread again after a month
what the fuck?

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

View attachment 4233198
That was the important bit. It is a confirmation that Zell was served, something the docket previously had not reflected. I don't particularly care about the other part, given that YT was already served (docket 20). Though, the date does interest me, as technically it is impossible since the court only found out his identity on January 4th. Maybe the clerk knows something we don't, maybe it's a clerical mistake. I factually reported what was written on the docket

Who the hell is "Commander ImperialSalt"? It sounds like the cross of a character from Star Wars & Victorian England.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Who the hell is "Commander ImperialSalt"? It sounds like the cross of a character from Star Wars & Victorian England.

That's @ZellZander 's YT name. Or was, before he deleted his YT account.

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

That's @ZellZander 's YT name. Or was, before he deleted his YT account.

Ah, that makes sense. Thank you.

 

[Adr1anD]

Acerthorn is officially suing his second ghost

Like a hurt, lost and blinded fool you've said too much

 

[CabbageTheSnackThatSlaps]

 

[Adr1anD]

Acerthorn filed two new suit attempts.
First one is against, I assume, @Acertard . I base this assumption on the Acertard's first message within this thread claiming the ownership and the text of the second complaint.

Hello there. I am actually behind the Acerthorn The True Acerthorn parody account. I've obviously been following this thread for sometime now.

Second one is against... Google. Yes. Again. For not acting on Acertard's channel icon infringing on Stabbins' copyright.
So far, only the complaint of the second has been opened.

Maybe someone else can open the first one?

 

[Acertard]

Stebbins v. Doe, 4:23-cv-00321 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Stebbins v. Doe, 4:23-cv-00321 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

Turns out, it's SidAlpha.
Time for SidAlpha to finally make use of that fucking lawyer, lmao.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

First one is against, I assume, @Acertard . I base this assumption on the Acertard's first message within this thread claiming the ownership and the text of the second complaint.

Complaint:

Spoiler: Images

Civil Cover Sheet

Spoiler: Images

Envelope:

Spoiler: Images

MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis:

Spoiler: Images

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order:

Spoiler: Images

Second one is against... Google. Yes. Again. For not acting on Acertard's channel icon infringing on Stabbins' copyright.
So far, only the complaint of the second has been opened.

IFP

Spoiler: Images

REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding

Spoiler: Images

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines

Spoiler: Images

Stebbins v. Doe, 4:23-cv-00321 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Stebbins v. Doe, 4:23-cv-00321 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

Turns out, it's SidAlpha.
Time for SidAlpha to finally make use of that fucking lawyer, lmao.
View attachment 4328326

Learn to use thumbnails.

Edit: TLDR on finances:


That's $984.46/month in income, $124.52 in savings, $495/month in expenditures, $40,000 student debt.

 

[Meat Target]

If you remove all the transformative content, it's no longer transformative.

No shit, Sherlock.

"The pizza has toppings, but if you take off all the toppings, it's no longer a pizza."

I've been wanting more content from Acer. This guy's a damned lunatic.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Cree says he will cover the new lawsuits tomorrow morning:

New update on 3:23-cv-00322-LJC Stebbins v. Google LLC:


@Mister Mint
Update on Stebbins v. Google LLC:



IFP motion granted, US Marshal ordered to serve Google on behalf of Acerthorn.