Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Some highlights include his weird, specifically-violent hypothetical scenario:
View attachment 4335289
View attachment 4335293

"No! I'm not literally suing everybody! REEEEEEEEE!"
View attachment 4335397View attachment 4335398

Black mold can only grow in vents:
View attachment 4335312

As relief, he wants SidAlpha to tell literally everyone on earth that he defamed Acer, and that if anyone ever makes fun of him on the internet again, SidAlpha will be held in contempt of court for it and arrested, even if it wasn't SidAlpha:
View attachment 4335366
View attachment 4335337
What fascinates me most about Acerthorn is how he treats these filings more like his blog than the lawsuit documentation they're supposed to be. It's somehow even less professionally written than Greer.
 
Not only that, but he wants it as injunctive relief.
He wants the judge to right now order SidAlpha to convince the world that Acer isn't an angry retard on the internet.
But he is?

I truly thought I had seen lol suits that were the best thing EVAR. But Acertard truly takes the cake. He's truly on another planet. Maybe it's the one where everybody gobbles like a turkey. Idk but it's amazing.
 
Where is @ZellZander when you need him?
He is not the hero we deserved, but the hero we needed. Still a massive retard, tho

Acerthorn's request for a writ has been denied
Screenshot_20230127-195608_Firefox.jpg

Edit: Stebbins v. Polano:
Screenshot 2023-01-27 224433.png
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Acerthorn's request for a writ has been denied
Mandamus? Prohibition?

What a loser. He should have had some ambition and filed an emergency petition for a writ of PROCEDENDO under the All-Writs Act demanding that the District Court rule immediately. Bitches love prerogative writs.
 
What a loser. He should have had some ambition and filed an emergency petition for a writ of PROCEDENDO under the All-Writs Act demanding that the District Court rule immediately. Bitches love prerogative writs.
You miss the 650d chess move by Acerthorn! All along this was just a ploy to get judge-sama to notice him!
 
Don't want to help out the retard but I've been awoke by a kitten crying for food so here's the gist of things
Being a media defendant will depend on the state. For example in Florida the Society for Science-Based Medicine was considered a media defendant in the Tobinick v. Novella case.

The … question … is whether or not the Society is a media defendant such that Plaintiffs were required to provide it with a pre-suit notice letter. “Although the express language of section 770.01 does not limit the type of defendant entitled to presuit notice, ‘[e]very Florida court that has considered the question has concluded that the presuit notice requirement applies only to “media defendants,” not to private individuals.'” In defining the term “media defendant,” courts have considered whether the defendant engages in the traditional function of the news media, which is “to initiate ‘uninhibited, robust, and wide-open debate on public issues.'”
Thus, media defendants are not just those who “impartially disseminate information,” or “issue unsolicited, disinterested and neutral commentary as to matters of public interest.” The term also applies to those who “editorialize as to matters of public interest without being commissioned to do so by [their] clients.”
The Court finds that the Society does, in fact, qualify as a media defendant entitled to the protections of Florida’s pre-suit notice statute. The stated mission of the Society, which is a not-for-profit corporation, “is to educate consumers, professionals, business people, legislators, law enforcement personnel, organizations and agencies about the concept of science-based medicine and to provide a discussion forum for issues in the area of medical science.” It also intends to operate “as the central source of information and discussion for all aspects of the concept of science-based medicine.” Its mission encompasses “[o]pposition to health care practices whose diagnoses, diagnostic methods, and therapies have no plausible basis in the scientific model of medicine or an insufficient basis in evidence to warrant their use.”.
Clearly, the issues which the Society intends to address are ones of public importance. Although the Society has a particular agenda, that does not rob it of the protections afforded it by the pre-suit notice statute. The Society’s mission falls squarely within that of the traditional media; it aims “to initiate ‘uninhibited, robust, and wide-open debate on public issues.'”
The fact that the Society may be opposed to certain health care practices it believes have “no plausible basis in the scientific model of medicine or an insufficient basis in evidence to warrant their use” does not render it a non-media defendant. A defendant may qualify as a member of the media for purposes of Florida’s pre-suit notice provision if it “editorialize as to matters of public interest without being commissioned to do so by its clients.” Here, there is no evidence that any of the allegedly false and/or defamatory statements were commissioned. The Court concludes that the Society is a media defendant, and it is consequently entitled to a remedy for Plaintiffs’ violation of the pre-suit notice statute.

Meanwhile in Texas you have the Service Employees International Union v. Professional Janitorial Service, Inc. which I believe you have to have reporting the news as your primary source of income.

In other words, look up the statute for any given State to find out where it stands in the matter.

A good source to read on the matter from the Washington Journal of Law, Technology, & Arts
Back to bed.
 
You can feel the judge rolling their eyes and heaving big sighs at the end of that order. “I don’t know what you think you can add to oppose this but whatever, take your shot.”
The cases are pretty obviously related and the courts want to avoid piecemeal litigation that could lead to contradictory results. Stabby of course actually wants this because he's a colossal fat douchebag who wants to annoy as many people as possible. He is fat, and so are his lolsuits.
 
Earth 2 is the NFT apes before the apes. UE, Sid and Callum Upton have done heaps of videos on this scam with the creator getting more and more pissed negative attention is being lobbied at this "game"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Essay2414778
Earth 2 is the NFT apes before the apes. UE, Sid and Callum Upton have done heaps of videos on this scam with the creator getting more and more pissed negative attention is being lobbied at this "game"
Are they worthy of a Community Watch thread? The way UE describes them, they sound more cultish than your typical cryptobros.
 
Back