Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Musashi's Son]

I have attached all of the available court documents from CourtListener.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

He did mention it on Page 8.
View attachment 5843345

Yah I missed that but he didn't say Null honored the DMCA just that that particular post is no longer there. I also was wrong as he's not claiming the DMCA notice itself but just the songs in the video Bruno made.

So shouldn't he be suing Bruno? As it's Bruno (sorry mate!) who made the video? I mean I know why Stabby isn't going afte Bruno as he's got no way to get his personal info to launch a suit but will the court not just say he's chasing the wrong dog?

Which confuses me a bit, how can Stabby say the song are unpublished when he's used them in all his vidoes over the last year?

Copyright law is a mess

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

Null likely expected this when he posted the DMCA. I wouldn't be surprised if he thought it would add fuel to the 10th circuit fucked up fire.

I noticed Stabby neglected to mention that Null in fact did adhere to the DMCA and took down the original post.

Funny he forgot to mention that bit huh?

He's effectively saying it doesn't really matter because Josh told the guy to add commentary and reupload. That upload is still up and in his mind is equivalent to the original post.

Anyone with any actual legal acumen want to comment on his stupid unpublished vs published argument? It reads like the sovereign citizen distinction between travelling and driving. Also, doesn't youtube have you click a button literally called "publish" to make a video public?

 

[Warm Lasagna]

I went ahead and pulled the complaint off PACER.

I skimmed it. It's about as batshit as you might think. He's asking for $900,000 in damages, related to copyrights he claims to own on six songs featured in the video that was uploaded here. Among other insanity, much ink is spilled about Greer vs. Moon and Clouldflare. I am not certain why the court would give a shit about any of that.

I'm on mobile ATM, so if @Useful_Mistake would like to post this garbage as images in this thread or a (presumably) new lolcow LLC thread, be my guest. Hope this helps. Have fun.

Edit: It won't let me attach the fucking file. It's a 2 mb PDF. What gives?

Sounds like the retard is trying to play checkers in a game of chess. Different set of rules. I assume the 4th circuit court would only look at the 10 circuit’s appeal decision if Acer could make a solid argument about why they should use that decision instead of their own or someone else’s.

But Acer doesn’t seem too bright, so I doubt it.

If I’m right about how this works, the 4th will look at this and make their own decision. NAL btw

 

[S.C.U.D.]

Acerthorn is not a fan of @Bruno Powroznik 's commentary video, and claims it is not fair use. His reasoning is that he doesn't consider it fair use, therefore it isn't. Take that!!!


Is this a typo? Shouldn't he say "wouldn't" here? Acerthorn, proofread your documents before filing, buddy! I'm starting to think you aren't very good at litigating!

It's official: @Bruno Powroznik is Null's racist middle manager, firing all black employees of the Kiwi Farms.

Last edit, I swear. Acerthorn spends forever complaining about @Bruno Powroznik before admitting that he is not the purpose of the suit. Way to waste the court's time, stupid.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

Which confuses me a bit, how can Stabby say the song are unpublished when he's used them in all his vidoes over the last year?

Copyright law is a mess

He also claims that the video Bruno criticized is on a private playlist. Meanwhile I can view it directly, note how it doesn't say that it is unlisted. YT Link (Archive)

Probably shouldn't lie in your legal documents Acerthorn.

 

[GaryGray]

Wow he is financials are something. About ~$1000/month income and benefits with $500/month in bills. Leaving a grand total of $500/month for food and an Internet connection. Depsite that he thinks his songs are worth $150k each.


When it comes to his damages this seem to say he is suing for damages that have not happened yet.

Also doxxxxxxxxxing

Now given that courtlistener did not remove his address Acerthorn must sue them next for doxxxxing him.

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

He also claims that the video Bruno criticized is on a private playlist. Meanwhile I can view it directly, note how it doesn't say that it is unlisted. YT Link (Archive)
View attachment 5843379View attachment 5843402
Probably shouldn't lie in your legal documents Acerthorn.

Acerthorn is a retard, but he actually addresses that. His claim is that the video, despite being publicly viewable and thus listed by Youtube as "published" is not actually considered published under law. His other claim is that the songs are in an unlisted playlist.

 

[3MMA]

All he’s doing is introducing himself to the court as a vexatious litigant

What some people do for a sense of control gets pretty ridiculous. People always have a choice, always have one thing they can control & that is their own reactions. Suing someone for posting something you don’t like online is really just showcasing your own lack of control & how it makes you feel to not be able to control others. Isn’t this what led to Acerfag being officially deemed vexatious in the past? It was clearly not criminal for Null to publish that email, it was always out of Acerfags control. His use of another vexatious fag (Greer) to support his non-argument is even more ridiculous. No matter how evil he tries to paint Null or this site, including all users here, it doesn’t make it true, & his furious grasping for one iota of control of what others say & do, is very small & pathetic.

---

ETA:

From @S.C.U.D. ’s post just above, note the use of “be a good boy,” in Acer’s official documents. He also told Null to “be a good boy,” in his DMCA takedown request. That’s not normal, especially when asking for something, in both cases being the court & Null. Total weirdo. Good boy? Weirdo.

 

[ChromaQuack]

I believe in the Turkey, he will become the first man to be declared a vexatious litigant in every single state.

Now given that courtlistener did not remove his address Acerthorn must sue them next for doxxxxing him.

And don't forget suing them for publishing the link to his super sekrit playlist


The court has UNCLEAN HANDS.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

He also claims that the video Bruno criticized is on a private playlist. Meanwhile I can view it directly, note how it doesn't say that it is unlisted. YT Link (Archive)
View attachment 5843379View attachment 5843402
Probably shouldn't lie in your legal documents Acerthorn.

He may be referring to its status with the Copyright Office, with which is is registered as an unpublished work, as Acerthorn as registered many of his published videos (because it's cheaper). Obviously, he fraudulently registered it, but in Acerthorn's mind since he registered it as unpublished and they didn't notice right away, it has officially become an unpublished work.

 

[Captain Manning]

I'm curious. Is there a certain point where you if you get struck down as a vexatious litigant in enough states, you get labeled as a vexatious litigant in all states?

AFAIK, no. I believe some states do not have a vexatious litigant doctrine, and different jurisdictions that do have different standards as to what constitutes one.

IIRC, the Mountain Jews were filing their bullshit in a jurisdiction where it's either hard or impossible to have somebody declared a VL.

I noticed Stabby neglected to mention that Null in fact did adhere to the DMCA and took down the original post.

Funny he forgot to mention that bit huh?

He's effectively saying it doesn't really matter because Josh told the guy to add commentary and reupload. That upload is still up and in his mind is equivalent to the original post.

Not quite. There were two DMCAs. The first Null honored, because he actually agreed with Stabby that a unaltered reupload absent commentary is not transformative to qualify as fair use. The second DMCA was rejected because Null felt the reupload was transformative enough. Stabby is arguing the second video is not transformative enough to qualify as fair use, so he's suing.

Technically, it would appear Stabby is following the correct legal procedure here under the DMCA, but I think the video is transformative enough and he should not prevail. At least I hope not.

What I find most hilarious here is all the irrelevant shit he includes in his complaint. No actual well-adjusted person, much less a well-adjusted lawyer, would write a complaint in this manner. Stabby is big mad.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

In Cali, yes. Does not apply to WV

And in Arkansas.

It does not apply in WV, but it makes it easier for other courts to label him as such once the ball gets rolling

I have attached all of the available court documents from CourtListener.

He's filing IFP but he has been able to spend money on:
-Comissioning private works
-Hiring an attorney to draft documents
-Register his copyrights

I hope Hardin has a field day with Stabby.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I Absolutely love Acerthorn

Asking for 900K is not enuff for him, he needs that 15 bucks he spent on printing out the complaint and mailing too. All in total he is asking for 900K in damages and 85 bucks in expenses including the cost to register the copyright of the very material he is suing over.

*chef kiss* Perfecto!

 

[Bruno Powroznik]

Words fail me, seriously. WHAT THE FUCK STABBINS

 

[S.C.U.D.]

I am disappointed that @Bruno Powroznik doesn't have a more offensive name, that would make the filing a lot funnier.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

View attachment 5843472

Words fail me, seriously. WHAT THE FUCK STABBINS

So what Acerthorn is saying is that he is a nigger?

 

[Pat Fried Rice]

View attachment 5843472

Words fail me, seriously. WHAT THE FUCK STABBINS

What is this retarded word salad? I can barely even follow the point he's trying to make, which I think is Josh and you conspired to have a unnamed black dude fired from his job.

@Bruno Powroznik how could you treat an innocent melatoninated individual with such disrespect?! Stabby will have you working in Patrick's pepperoni farm until you're an old shit posting Kiwi!

 

[Adr1anD]

How many vexatious litigates are there?

According to this publicly available document, at least three thousand.

Just file all of the legal documents that declare him as the Emperor.

If it was not a pricy cow-tipping, I would buy him a piece of specific land in Denmark or Scotland that gives the owner the noble title of a Lord, following this practice.
That could boost his unwarranted self-confidence to new levels, seeing how US is against him but EU recognizes him as someone worthy lmao

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

What is this retarded word salad? I can barely even follow the point he's trying to make, which I think is Josh and you conspired to have a unnamed black dude fired from his job.

@Bruno Powroznik how could you treat an innocent melatoninated individual with such disrespect?! Stabby will have you working in Patrick's pepperoni farm until you're an old shit posting Kiwi!

My guess would be that Stabby thinks if he shows how ebil and nasty and mean and nazi and ugly and gross the Farms and Jersh are then the judge will pull a Greer and give him the win just because we are such bad people that to rule in our favor is an evil act in itself no matter what the facts say.

TLDR he's malding about the thread and Jersh telling him to go suck a toad and hoping to prejudice the court so he can get a win at long last.