Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Sneed Force One]

From about 54:21 of TheSpectreReport's 08/07/2025 Stream, Jarrod was watching and shared an email with Spectre an he sent to Stebbins on 08/02/2025 at 09:53AM

Spoiler: Text Copy

jarrod stangranch.com
To: Acerthorn acerthorn@yahoo.com Sat 8/2/2025 9:53 AM

You've done an extreme overreach. This is not a "harmless error". Rule 61 does not affect the substantial rights of the parties. It’s purpose is to prevent courts from overturning judgments or granting new trials based on errors. It does not protect you from lifting my signature, without my permission mind you, and stating that we signed it in agreement. All you had to do was send me the document, and I’d sign it.

What you have done is committed fraud on a a federal document, and that is not a "harmless error".

Here's what I'm going to do, I am going to notify the court of this error on your part, and in 21-days I am going to file sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, and Local Rules 83-7 for your behavior. Due to the ethical and procedural integrity within the court that you have willfully broken. Submitting it under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 61, does not give you the protection you think you have. It is deliberate and to try to escape sanctions brought against you in court previously, prior to the dismissal order.

Under Local Rule 83-7, the court may impose sanctions for bad faith conduct, or actions that unreasonably interfere with the administration of justice. The use of a forged signature in a court filings falls squarely within this scope.

In accordance with Rule 11's safe harbor provision, I am providing you 21 days from the date of this notice to withdraw the offending document and notify the court of the error. If you fail to take corrective action within that time frame, I will proceed with filing a motions for Sanctions.

Which may include the usual, Monetary Penalties, Striking the forged document from the record, and referral to disciplinary authorities.

Please treat this matter with the seriousness it warrants. I reserve all rights and remedies available under law.

Sincerely,

Jarrod Jones
Defendant

 

[DavidS877]

From about 54:21 of TheSpectreReport's 08/07/2025 Stream, Jarrod was watching and shared an email with Spectre an he sent to Stebbins on 08/02/2025 at 09:53AM

Someone did let him know he needs to serve Stabby with the actual motion to start the 21 day clock if he chooses that route. Which I'm sure will mean Stabby will then immediately serve Jarrod with a motion for sanctions of his own for.... something?

 

[Sneed Force One]

Someone did let him know he needs to serve Stabby with the actual motion to start the 21 day clock if he chooses that route. Which I'm sure will mean Stabby will then immediately serve Jarrod with a motion for sanctions of his own for.... something?

There appears to be a small "Fuck Stabbins" cabal of legal advocates giving amateur advice to Jerrod, performing basic research and proofreading. Spectre said in the livestream he made Jerrod aware of that fact.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Someone did let him know he needs to serve Stabby with the actual motion to start the 21 day clock if he chooses that route.

Stabby himself let him know.


What a great guy, always making sure proper litigation procedures are being followed!

 

[thegunbuilderguy]

From about 54:21 of TheSpectreReport's 08/07/2025 Stream, Jarrod was watching and shared an email with Spectre an he sent to Stebbins on 08/02/2025 at 09:53AM

More seriously, i'm glad in part that he's going after his ass, but sad that he's going the "you have 21 days to take it OFF THE INTERNET" instead of just telling him he's fucked because it's not publishing false information that's fucked, it's forgery in the first place, that act cannot be undone unlike a published document, it's the action being done in the instant IIRC

Also bummed that he didn't go further by getting his ass grilled for forgery which is a violation of the law on its own, not just some in-court sanctionnable conduct.

 

[Seria]

Stabby himself let him know.

View attachment 7751156
What a great guy, always making sure proper litigation procedures are being followed!

isnt it really great david did serve nether motion under rule 5 to jarrod when he made his dismissals (twice) yet he 100% clearly knows and tells jarrod that in the emails? Not even just that jarrod from the exchange even complained the first time to david to it and yet he did it again. This must look so willful to the court i hope

 

[Seria]

View attachment 7751874
View attachment 7751879

More seriously, i'm glad in part that he's going after his ass, but sad that he's going the "you have 21 days to take it OFF THE INTERNET" instead of just telling him he's fucked because it's not publishing false information that's fucked, it's forgery in the first place, that act cannot be undone unlike a published document, it's the action being done in the instant IIRC

Also bummed that he didn't go further by getting his ass grilled for forgery which is a violation of the law on its own, not just some in-court sanctionnable conduct.

from that email it looks that he might already have filed / started working on a sanctions motion. So i would guess he goes hard after him there. I think right now most likely just telling the court as soon as possible and dont look like an ass right there and then is a bit important. I cant think the judge is happy ether that even the dismissal is a fucking mess and jarrod complains about that too. I found the reply motion to be good.

If we look back to the first OSC he got he got it the same way like jarrod wrote this to the court and the court did take actions them self actually.. and back then it was over a jokingly small sum of 15 $or something like that

 

[thegunbuilderguy]

from that email it looks that he might already have filed / started working on a sanctions motion. So i would guess he goes hard after him there. I think right now most likely just telling the court as soon as possible and dont look like an ass right there and then is a bit important. I cant think the judge is happy ether that even the dismissal is a fucking mess and jarrod complains about that too. I found the reply motion to be good.

If we look back to the first OSC he got he got it the same way like jarrod wrote this to the court and the court did take actions them self actually.. and back then it was over a jokingly small sum of 15 $or something like that

I don't care about sanctions I want him RAPED IN JAIL FOREVER WITH A 15 BILLION DOLLAR BOND WITH SATAN PERSONALLY PRODDING HIM WITH HIS FLAMING FORK

♪And that can only happen with an actual report on a break of the law instead of something that's very limited in positive outcomes (for us) vs a proper civil/criminal case that will bring justice to this man♫


(.)

 

[Bill Evans 45]

Jarrods Response is out ! And its jucy!

That is a thing of beauty and a joy forever.
Much like Hardin's recent Greee filing, it brings in an exhibit demonstrating willful recalcitrance on the part of Stebbins in previous litigation, his misconduct and devious gamesmanship. The bonus evidence of further criminal malfeasance is like a sunset stroll after a great dinner.
If LOTY had a ' lolcow document of the year' section this would be a strong contender.

 

[Oliver Onions]

Imagine if filing the thing closed the file. Defendants everywhere would be just filing "We've reached an agreement, please dismiss this case with prejudice."

Motion to pick up my ball and go home, yuh honnah.