Debate Arm Pit Cream on why Pol Pot did nothing wrong

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi,
those two guys but unironically. Gaddafi was smart, he was willing to reconcile with Israel
Trudeau (first and second)
I don't know anyone outside of shitty internet forums and 4chan that think the Trudeaus were bad leaders. They were terrible leaders, but most people aren't >>>rEdPiLlEd<<< enough to know that
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
But that’s not right, silly~

Total civilian deaths in Vietnam were around 2 million (and bear in mind that’s deaths caused by both sides in both North and South Vietnam), while a conservative estimate of the number of dead in the Killing Fields is 1.7 million. Sure, there might be ~300,000 more deaths in Vietnam, but when you remember that Vietnam had a population of 36 million people as opposed to Cambodia’s 8 million it’s obvious that the death rate in Vietnam was much lower.
Again, to quote you
  • Me say: “America bomb Vietnam more time, but people no die as much as Cambodia.”
You said die in general, not death rate, stupid.

Where are all the skulls?
 
no argument 💤

It wasn't meant to be an argument, it was meant to mock you. I've now changed my mind, and decided that you, the Pilipedo, and Vaush should all be condemned to live together for a period no less than 1 year, but no more than 10 years.

Killing all the intellectuals and foreigners is based but doing it to install communism is retarded.

THe scary thing is that APC probably fancies themselves an intellectual.
 
You said die in general, not death rate, stupid.
You’re claiming that American bombing in Cambodia caused a majority of the 1.7 million deaths, yeah? Want to know how many North Vietnamese were killed as a result of US bombing operations during the war?

65,000.

Hmmm. What was that you were saying about more deaths again?

TL;DR
7AF9A5D4-63E8-4A30-A6D6-20B4D9FF059E.jpeg
 
You’re claiming that American bombing in Cambodia caused a majority of the 1.7 million deaths, yeah? Want to know how many North Vietnamese were killed as a result of US bombing operations during the war?

65,000.

Hmmm. What was that you were saying about more deaths again?

TL;DR
View attachment 1756242
Northern Vietnam had a good airforce that kinda kicked ass of America despite the technology gap, comparing it to an even more underdeveloped nation like Cambodia just shows lack of understanding of either situation. No worries, I get Americans are slow.

I've actually been over many of the reasons already you mong, factors like Vietnamese support of KR regime drying up, communists countries turning their back on the nation and being one of the most underdeveloped nations in the world. But, no totally those weren't factors and everything happened exactly as the US government said it did, Henry Kissinger is epic.

You admit you're a tranny finally? Not sure why you'd to represent yourself as a woman.
 
Northern Vietnam had a good airforce that kinda kicked ass of America despite the technology gap, comparing it to an even more underdeveloped nation like Cambodia just shows lack of understanding of either situation.
The majority of USAF losses were due to SAMs, and those were largely fighters. there were 17 B-52 combat losses in total, with 15 of those taking place during the 729 sorties of Linebacker II. I’ll do the math for you — 15/729 is equal to just over a 2% loss rate, which roughly translates as “the North Vietnamese didn’t stop shit when it came to the bombings”.

an even more underdeveloped nation like Cambodia
and being one of the most underdeveloped nations in the world.
Whoa, hold on there partner! I thought you said Pol Pot massively increased the standard of living in Cambodia?
 
The majority of USAF losses were due to SAMs, and those were largely fighters. there were 17 B-52 combat losses in total, with 15 of those taking place during the 729 sorties of Linebacker II. I’ll do the math for you — 15/729 is equal to just over a 2% loss rate, which roughly translates as “the North Vietnamese didn’t stop shit when it came to the bombings”.
So you're just gonna ignore the other campaigns and misrepresent the losses of the US that much? I knew you were pathetic but even for you this is desperate, not to mention a dishonor to the brave US airforce that battled communism.
Screenshot_20201129-172301_Chrome.jpg

Whoa, hold on there partner! I thought you said Pol Pot massively increased the standard of living in Cambodia?
I forgot how you could go from being one of the poorest countries in the world into able to take on the US full force, that makes so much sense.
 
So you're just gonna ignore the other campaigns and misrepresent the losses of the US that much? I knew you were pathetic but even for you this is desperate, not to mention a dishonor to the brave US airforce that battled communism.
View attachment 1756415
Well yeah, you mentioned bombing campaigns and I guess I was naive enough to assume you meant the ones that actually involved widespread bombing (with actual bombers) and mass civilian casualties. Y’know, since there were more deaths in Vietnam than Cambodia “because it was more heavily populated”.
 
The majority of USAF losses were due to SAMs, and those were largely fighters. there were 17 B-52 combat losses in total, with 15 of those taking place during the 729 sorties of Linebacker II. I’ll do the math for you — 15/729 is equal to just over a 2% loss rate, which roughly translates as “the North Vietnamese didn’t stop shit when it came to the bombings”.
2% is a lot for a great power. Imagine losing 2% of all troops that did tours in Afghanistan. The American blockade also did damage to Indochina. I think you have to realize that it was a combination of factors that led to life expectancy dropping during Pol Pot's reign, but not Pol Pot's actions himself
 
The Netherlands, during the great war, had to do food rationing because of the British blockade despite not being in the war. This was the same situation with Cambodia
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
The Netherlands, during the great war, had to do food rationing because of the British blockade despite not being in the war. This was the same situation with Cambodia
Maybe so, but I’d wager vast swathes of the Dutch population didn’t contract a fatal case of lead poisoning at the same time.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MrJokerRager
The only good thing Pol Pot did was sending all of the champagne socialists and journos out into the countryside to die by doing all the work they thought they would never have to do.

Everything else was an unmitigated atrocity, like every other communist revolution.
 
Back