Debate Arm Pit Cream on why Pol Pot did nothing wrong

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Arm Pit Cream

5%er, Jupiterian Philosopher, Anglophobe, CSIS
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Where's the content? I feel like anytime there's a thread on a communist community on here anymore it's done out of ideological spite rather than being genuinely funny.
As the person who documented Chapo on here before it went down, this community is not even remotely comparable in size or mental illness.

This makes this subreddit a promising place for politicow content, even compared to the rest of the site.
How? Why?

Some other content includes using skewed polls to claim that most of former East Germany wants communism back:

https://www.reddit.com/r/GenZedong/comments/k2h9tg/the_germans_hated_communism/
Nice opinion, but it's not a "skewed" poll in anyway. Kind just revealing your political bias straight out of the gate. I understand you disagree, but that doesn't make the Der Spiegel poll bias.

wow a neoliberal has liberal fans wtf, stop the presses

The USA "genocided millions" in the middle east, which is why the Iraq Body Count only measured a few hundred thousand,
The US backed the Mujahedeen and funded the creation of Israel, the death toll at the hands of American imperialism and greed is easily in the millions. The war crimes the US and Israel have committed are far from genocide, but the denial of US war crimes once again shows a heavy bias.

anarchists are just liberals who wear black, and the USA bombing Cambodia was bad but the PRC supporting Pol Pot subsequently wasn't
So you complain about them being too liberal, before crying about supporting Pol Pot? It's an undisputed fact America asked China to support Pol Pot. Not to mention if you look at the life expectancy in Cambodia, it actually went from 23 when Pol Pot got power to 27 by the time Pol Pot left, which clearly shows a raise in living standards. I think you really need to do more research into history.


Denying some genocide is not enough, it's pro-China people repeating Chinese lines. The only thing in this thread is confusion over what a Dengist is and a need to put politics before funny.
 
Where's the content? I feel like anytime there's a thread on a communist community on here anymore it's done out of ideological spite rather than being genuinely funny.
As the person who documented Chapo on here before it went down, this community is not even remotely comparable in size or mental illness.


How? Why?


Nice opinion, but it's not a "skewed" poll in anyway. Kind just revealing your political bias straight out of the gate. I understand you disagree, but that doesn't make the Der Spiegel poll bias.


wow a neoliberal has liberal fans wtf, stop the presses


The US backed the Mujahedeen and funded the creation of Israel, the death toll at the hands of American imperialism and greed is easily in the millions. The war crimes the US and Israel have committed are far from genocide, but the denial of US war crimes once again shows a heavy bias.


So you complain about them being too liberal, before crying about supporting Pol Pot? It's an undisputed fact America asked China to support Pol Pot. Not to mention if you look at the life expectancy in Cambodia, it actually went from 23 when Pol Pot got power to 27 by the time Pol Pot left, which clearly shows a raise in living standards. I think you really need to do more research into history.


Denying some genocide is not enough, it's pro-China people repeating Chinese lines. The only thing in this thread is confusion over what a Dengist is and a need to put politics before funny.
If you're going to troll this thread you really need to try better than apologising for the Khmer Rouge. No one is going to fall for that.
 
If you're going to troll this thread you really need to try better than apologising for the Khmer Rouge. No one is going to fall for that.
You cried about them shitting on the US, then cried about them supporting a US backed regime the next line. You also can't really talk about Cambodia when you don't know the basic history my dude.
 
You cried about them shitting on the US, then cried about them supporting a US backed regime the next line. You also can't really talk about Cambodia when you don't know the basic history my dude.
All I said was that they didn't condemn China for their role in supporting Pol Pot, because they support China uncritically and only condemn the American involvement in that disaster. The idea Pol Pot increased life expectancy in Cambodia is also laughable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
The idea Pol Pot increased life expectancy in Cambodia is also laughable.
7ab3f8bf1ae897e0fbf4d7751894fe47.png4f20b2dd7bb84e67c7da00fbb7375403.png
I'm sorry you're not willing to look these things up before you spew propaganda, but it did increase despite the US bombing the shit out of the country. Pretty remarkable actually :drink:
 
This is a graph of life expectancy increasing after he's gone.
That's not very accurate it increased well he was in office. It speaks more to the standards of a society that was built how it functions when it doesn't have a foreign neighbor actively invading or the biggest country in the world dropping chemical bombs. Do you unironically think that has no impact and somehow there can be such a radical increase in life expectancy without the proper systems put in place?
 
That's not very accurate it increased well he was in office. It speaks more to the standards of a society that was built how it functions when it doesn't have a foreign neighbor actively invading or the biggest country in the world dropping chemical bombs. Do you unironically think that has no impact and somehow there can be such a radical increase in life expectancy without the proper systems put in place?
Literally you have an image that says he became prime minister in 63 and left power in 79 followed by a graph showing life expectancy beginning to fall in 63 and then rebounding in 79. Literally you posted evidence showing the exact opposite of what you wanted to show.

He killed a bunch of people. Life expectancy goes down. He stops doing that. Life expectancy goes up. People value life more now because horrible shit gave them a sense of perspective and life expectancy rises higher than it was originally.

That's not him raising life expectancy. That's him lowering it for the duration of his rule.
That's him being so obscenely shit people decided to be less shit after he left.
 
Back