Debate the differences and usefulness of many different kinds of ammo and weaponry

>His battle rifle isn't chambered in .308 Winchester
>He probably owns an M1A because of the internet memes about Nigger hawk down

NGMI
Oh hell no, I have a G3. Specifically one with a match-grade barrel I've got set up as a DMR. Deutsche Qualität over meme shit like the FN FAL ("right hand of the free world", which no nation in the "free world" has used for over 30 years) or the literal WW2 relics (M1A/M14).

Yes, it's a proper 7.62x51mm NATO rifle. But any rifle that can eat 7.62 NATO can eat .308, just not the other way around.
 
1. See my updated comment above. There isn't an intermediate cartridge, "armor piercing" or not, that will reliably defeat NIJ IV armor. Using that as a metric of whether or not something is effective is not (in my opinion) very relevant, because in most cases the plate covers a relatively small part of your body and you cannot extend that level 4 protection everywhere because it would simply be impossible to fight in.
That's what I said in a post that got migrated. You want to penetrate NIJ IV, use a full-power rifle bullet, preferably something that's got a penetrator core or is just an outright AP bullet.
IDK where you're getting the info that they didn't have anything suppressed aside from pistols.
Call of Duty, that's where.
 
That's what I said in a post that got migrated. You want to penetrate NIJ IV, use a full-power rifle bullet, preferably something that's got a penetrator core or is just an outright AP bullet.
You won't penetrate NIJ IV with a full power rifle bullet, even with AP ammo. It's specifically rated to stop that exact sort of thing.
 
You won't penetrate NIJ IV with a full power rifle bullet, even with AP ammo. It's specifically rated to stop that exact sort of thing.
Once or twice, that's the standard if I remember right. That being said, civilians in the USA can't legally own AP ammunition anyway, best you'll get is EP.

I meant my post as a more "If you're dead set on not aiming for the hips or the face, do this". At least, that's what I was taught ; Someone's wearing armor, aim for the not armored bits.
Because any soft armor's probably going to be IIIA, which means anything except a rifle bullet's useless*. Any hard armor's probably going to be IV, which means I'm going to either need to shoot repeatedly with an EP and hope the bastard's getting hurt from the impact, or aim for his hips/face.

*Yes, Shotgun cultists, this includes your precious buckshot loads. No, shotguns are not ideal for home defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
1. See my updated comment above. There isn't an intermediate cartridge, "armor piercing" or not, that will reliably defeat NIJ IV armor. Using that as a metric of whether or not something is effective is not (in my opinion) very relevant, because in most cases the plate covers a relatively small part of your body and you cannot extend that level 4 protection everywhere because it would simply be impossible to fight in.

2. By the time the 9x39 was developed, Soviet special forces had been using the PBS-1 suppressor on their 7.62 rifles with subsonic ammo for almost 2 decades. Hell they had a suppressed underbarrel grenade launcher complex for the AKM at that time. IDK where you're getting the info that they didn't have anything suppressed aside from pistols.
1. The original post I replied to was about how 9x39mm made 7.62x39mm obsolete for SF uses. Well, it's clear it didn't, and I wrote why: no decisive advantages in penetration and shitty ballistics. I'd also add the ability to use "normal" supersonic rounds in AKM.

2. My bad, I forgot about 7.62x39 US. Yes, it was a dumb statement for me to make.
 
1. The original post I replied to was about how 9x39mm made 7.62x39mm obsolete for SF uses. Well, it's clear it didn't, and I wrote why: no decisive advantages in penetration and shitty ballistics. I'd also add the ability to use "normal" supersonic rounds in AKM.

2. My bad, I forgot about 7.62x39 US. Yes, it was a dumb statement for me to make.
There was SOME advantage in penetration and terminal ballistics with 9x39 over 7.62 subsonic, bullet weight is a helluva drug. But it does lead to the caliber being a specialist one, as opposed to 7.62x39 which remains sort of a jack of all trades.
 
Well, color me disappointed. I thought perhaps this thread would be a common sense discussion about various weapons for self-defense, home defense, hunting, etc; not a bunch of gun nerds flexing the biggest, baddest most expensive weaponry...
What do you imagine you'd be using these weapons for? (This is not a rhetorical question, genuinely curious)

For example, when in the high country, I'm carrying the lightest rifle that can take down elk and deer (Winchester)and a sidearm, preferably the largest caliber revolver I can handle, that is capable of outright killing if not dissuading a bear. For upland a nice light easy-to-carry shotgun (the Rem 870) serves double duty as it's great for waterfowl also. For plinking and varmints around the house a Rem .22.
For home protection, the trusty shotgun is affordable and effective 90 percent of the time you would be needing it, and as always, at least one sidearm, usually a 9mm Glock.
I know that a shotgun is not the " best" for home defense, but as always, it is situational. What can you afford? How affordable and common is the ammo? Where do you live? City or country? Who would be targeting you and why? Truth be told, home defense is the least important to me as far as weaponry needed, since there are many other ways to set up defense before a firearm is needed. Bring on the tiger traps, moats, geese, dogs, cameras, motion sensors, trip wires, and things that go boom...you get the idea. I live in an area that is pretty remote and was in part selected for its natural defenses. You got to find me first, then you have to be able to approach without being seen.
My concealed carry gun is a Kimber mini 9mm (too expensive but it was a gift) but for open carry, I like the Glock 17.
Why a 9mm Glock for a sidearm?
Well, it is dependable and is most commonly the type of handgun carried by LEO and militia-type folks. In the event of a civil unrest situation, being able to "pick up" someone else's gun and be practiced with it is crucial.
Didn't mean to write a novel, but these are the type of weapons that are useful to me. YMMV.
Gee, I guess autism is contagious.
Have I poked the hive sufficiently?
Love you guys. Carry on.
 
Last edited:
Some basic armor is better than no armor, but thin sheet of metal isn't stopping a 30mm APHE round. My next modelmaking adventure will be a war diorama from ukraine, with an M113 destroyed in a field and a chad T-72 looking over it.
My brother in Christ what 30mm cannon ammo are you talking about, the M113 is pennable by .30-06 black-tip AP in certain areas. I imagine 12.7 or 14.5mm would go through it like butter, not to mention anything bigger.
 
My brother in Christ what 30mm cannon ammo are you talking about, the M113 is pennable by .30-06 black-tip AP in certain areas. I imagine 12.7 or 14.5mm would go through it like butter, not to mention anything bigger.
30mm would be the most common round on the battlefield, given the abundance of BMP-2s, BTRs, and other armored vehicles. Afaik the front plate has a chance of stopping a 20mm round, but only at really long range and against a somewhat slow bullet.
 
You won't penetrate NIJ IV with a full power rifle bullet, even with AP ammo. It's specifically rated to stop that exact sort of thing.
Cold war Tracer will do the trick. you dont need to Penetrate the Body armor if you can just knock the person down while setting everything around on fire...
Just dont use anything made after the 80s, you need to many of them to start a fire.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: MG-34
Well, color me disappointed. I thought perhaps this thread would be a common sense discussion about various weapons for self-defense, home defense, hunting, etc; not a bunch of gun nerds flexing the biggest, baddest most expensive weaponry...
What do you imagine you'd be using these weapons for? (This is not a rhetorical question, genuinely curious)
All these posts were originally in the Russian Ukraine war thread specifically discussing the relative obsolescence of certain calibers used in those countries. Civilian use never factored into the discussion.
 
My brother in Christ what 30mm cannon ammo are you talking about, the M113 is pennable by .30-06 black-tip AP in certain areas. I imagine 12.7 or 14.5mm would go through it like butter, not to mention anything bigger.
man its sad that they are forced to use an APC from the cold war that was out dated when it was made. anyone in a m113 would be better off in an open top jeep from ww2 since they can dismount rapidly if they come under fire in the jeep. plus with the jeep you get less shrapnel from spall if your shot at. its kinda funny how the Ukraine war as brought everything back to the cold war and further back. though I guess it proves that the cold war was the last time any of the countries involved made shit at a scale that was ready for a war.
 
There was SOME advantage in penetration and terminal ballistics with 9x39 over 7.62 subsonic, bullet weight is a helluva drug. But it does lead to the caliber being a specialist one, as opposed to 7.62x39 which remains sort of a jack of all trades.
If Russian Wikipedia is correct, first prototypes of VSS were using 7.62x39mm subsonic. Later, the project switched to purpose-built 7.62x28mm round. But in 1985, new requirements dropped: VSS was supposed to penetrate 6B2/Zh-81 body armor (which offered ballistic protection similar to NIJ type II-IIIA) at 400m. 7.62mm subsonic rounds failed and were replaced by 9x39mm.
 
if in this thread we add civi use to calibers. 9mm is THE pistol and self defense caliber. since its plentiful and your common attacker is unlikely to be using any form of armor save for a thick leather jacket. oddly .300BLK is a good home defense round due to it being heavy but slow meaning it'll lose most of its energy when it pens anything. add on the fact it was made for short rifles and enclosed spaces it'll treat you right every time. light shotgun loads work just as well here as they will pepper you attacker and really fuck em up.
 
It's the most popular. I'm much more fond of 10mm myself and can make plenty of arguments as to why it's a better option than 9mm, unless of course you're a woman or European.
look I LOVE 10mm with a passion, but its not as common and the guns that fire it are normally bulkier (at least the ones I've seen). though if we want to race to the bottom? .22lr... NEVER use .22lr for self defense. it's weak and wile it will poke holes in an attacker it wont stop anyone with enough pain tolerance and adrenaline from continuing to advance and attack you. 9mm is the base line because grandma, any anyone else who cant handle hotter rounds like .45acp or 10mm can use and it still be effective.
 
All these posts were originally in the Russian Ukraine war thread specifically discussing the relative obsolescence of certain calibers used in those countries. Civilian use never factored into the discussion.
Fair enough.
Thanks for the answer.
I must have missed the tie this thread had with the Russia/Ukraine thread.


eta
@Scotched up Scott & @ForTheHoard
Bingo. I would love to be able to effectively handle a 10mm, but I am a small woman and old enough to be a grandma.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scotched up Scott
What’s the deal with that 12mm rifle cartridge the Russian were using? im not talking about their .50 BMG equivalent
 
For home protection, the trusty shotgun is affordable and effective 90 percent of the time you would be needing it, and as always, at least one sidearm, usually a 9mm Glock.
I have a Makarov PM and an AKM. Shotguns are terrible for home protection, especially the fabled 12gauge, for most of the population.
My concealed carry gun is a Kimber mini 9mm (too expensive but it was a gift) but for open carry, I like the Glock 17.
Mine is a Makarov. Small enough to conceal easily, big enough to get a good hold on. When coupled with Hornady Critical Defense HP 9x18mm, it makes a good (if a bit obsolete) concealable handgun.

My AK is my "all in one"/"general purpose rifle". Zombies, aliens, demons, ANTIFA(ggots), doesn't matter, you can never go wrong with a trusty Kalashnikov.

If I need to reach out and touch someone, I'll take either my G3 or my SMLE No.1 Mk.III. For hunting, the SMLE every time, that bayonet comes in handy when the animal's dangerous. For hypothetically shooting man-sized targets at 600+ meters, my G3 (which I have set up as a DMR) works wonders.

I have an AR-15 in 5.56, but that's out of obligation. I.E., I'd be a fool to not have a good 5.56x45mm gun in inventory.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
What’s the deal with that 12mm rifle cartridge the Russian were using? im not talking about their .50 BMG equivalent
the one the shAK 12 was using? it's meant to be a ultra quite urban round with improved armor penetration. 5.45 like 5.56 is nearing its limit for AP applications and body armor is still improving.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Seafarer
Back