Debate user "More AWS-8Q Than You" about whether banging a 17-year-old makes you a pedophile

LilyoftheDesert said:
The fact that you feel otherwise is an interesting insight into your priorities as a parent. You would rather "strangle" a man who can take care of and provide for your daughter because of his age, and would rather her date someone her own age who almost certainly isn't in a position to do that.
It's almost like you care more about the way things look than what's best for your child's future.

I'd a million times over pick a 30 year old with a mortgage and experience who will take care of my daughter and give her a good life after she's out of my house.
Click to expand...
When my daughters are 17 there will still be a man who takes care of and provides for them. He is their father.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Hillary Clinton's Ass, Blackhole, GunCar Gary and 7 others
Drain Todger said:
In my experience, online discussions about the age of consent never end well. Ever.
Click to expand...
all i'll say is it seems everyone arbitrarily decided 18 was the way to go when people are still mostly retarded then while 16 is when men are allowed to die for their country in most parts
 
LilyoftheDesert said:
First. I will say. I think if a person is 16 or 17 years old and they don't know whether or not they want to put their P into someone's V, or have a P put into their V at that age, it's over for them. I had my first part time job at 14, I had summer jobs at 12/13, I got my first full time job at 17, I had a lot of other decisions I was making at that age which were much harder than "do I want to bang this person" or "Do I want this person to bang me"
Click to expand...
Ted Kaczynski said:
Banging 17 year olds is legal in most US states and European countries.
17 year olds are almost always fully developed and post pubescent with an increased capacity to consent than a literal child.
Dudes have been going after girls fresh out of high school for decades now, and before then it was just normal. It is a little weird when it’s 50 and 17, or even 30 and 17, but not unconscionable
Click to expand...
As a 20 year old the way you guys talk about sex with 17 year olds would make me spray you with Mace if I ever had the displeasure of seeing you IRL
Dating around your age range is maybe the one rule of human civilization that is so so easy to follow yet is always broken by horny groomers like y'all (and no the fact that "it's le history" doesn't not make it wrong you retard)
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: isalaide, Toji Suzuhara, Hey Johnny Bravo and 1 other person
This is very relevant to this thread:
IMG_7348.jpeg
Time and time again, the groomers here show that they can’t comprehend non-transactional relationships (which is what friendships are). The reason for this is because they are incapable of comprehending abstract thought; also known as the key ingredient in empathy and compassion.

They are no better than the third worlder that believes raping little kids will cure them of AIDs or that eating cow dung is good for their health. Why?

Because like the aforementioned examples, they act on impulse. For them, their impulse is justifying why they’re attracted to minors. The reasons for their retarded diatribes is because they have no moral or logical explanation for their sickness. Deep down they know that they’re degenerates who cannot control their impulses.

That’s why they feel comfortable in admitting to their psychotic attraction to minors without realizing how much they’re embarrassing themselves. Perhaps they think that KiwiFarms is more open to pedophiles just because they’re not banned on site.
 
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
  • Feels
Reactions: ADHD Mate, Extremely Unrelaxed, Mound Dweller and 8 others
God of Nothing said:
all i'll say is it seems everyone arbitrarily decided 18 was the way to go when people are still mostly retarded then while 16 is when men are allowed to die for their country in most parts
Click to expand...


Any kind of enforceable law needs a definite cut-off, which will necessarily leads to corner cases.

But I think most people will agree, that it is creepy and dusturbing when a forty year old man has sex with an 18 year old girl, but much less creepy if an 18 year old has sex with a 17 year old. The former naturally makes us nauseous, because we know that this can never be any kind of equal relationship, while the latter potentially could.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Toji Suzuhara, God of Nothing, Kiwisee and 1 other person
If you're old enough to drive to it you're old enough to suck it. End of discussion.

There's a big difference between a 7 year old and a 17 year old. Quit acting like its the same.

Half of em already drink or are on drugs so don't act like they're some innocent angels needing protection. They are not

Plus 16 is the age of consent in some states, so why the hell is this even being argued.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Disagree
Reactions: The Last Stand, Mound Dweller, Blackhole and 5 others
LilyoftheDesert said:
17 isn't a minor in the majority of the world. It's literally only American retards who think this way lmao.
Click to expand...
AoC and age of majority are different things.

LilyoftheDesert said:
If the question were "is it pedophilia to be attracted to 14 year olds" then no one would be here defending that, but the question is "is it pedophilia to be attracted to 17 year olds"
and the answer is no.
Click to expand...
That stopped being the argument when you started posting like a psycho about how love is not real and that chad got all the girls.

LilyoftheDesert said:
17 year olds are post Tanner Stage 5, their long bone growth plates are fused. Women are as beautiful as they'll ever be at 17/18 probably up to about 24/25 then the wrinkles, and gravity, and life beats them down, and the lifestyle that the modern woman lives today where loose sex is celebrated instead of shamed, they turn into gross, punched out roasties.
Click to expand...
Tell me of a single normal person who uses the Tanner scale to determine who to date. (Scale that was created by a brit, btw).

LilyoftheDesert said:
It's absolutely insane to say that a 17 year old is a child. But then you come from a shithole country where people can't even drink alcohol until they're 21 lmao.
Click to expand...
Legally 17yos are children in almost every country.

Also, girls usually reach Tanner V at 14-15 years of age. Do you support adults dating girls that young?
 
How do people come to obvious bait threads and have genuine debates.

Here I'll end the debate right now.

People fuck 17 year olds.

It's not illegal

You would too.

Anyone pretending otherwise is lying and being holier than thou to make up for your lack of any other morals.

Debate over. Now get drunk. And find yourself a lady.
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: The Last Stand, Mound Dweller, DickMain and 3 others
LilyoftheDesert said:
Good point. I'll say it simply then.
Women spend thousands of dollars on creams, make-up, and other things to try to preserve their youth because everyone knows that a youthful woman is more attractive than an old woman.
Pretending otherwise is retarded.
Click to expand...
They aren't trying to look like a literal child tho
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: DOUBLE_WHEEL, Toji Suzuhara and Inside your walls
LilyoftheDesert said:
It's actually not that easy since you have to compete with all the young men in their prime, you have to have something special that a woman wants that she's willing to choose you as an option over younger, more energetic men.
Click to expand...
Nigger, just having a car, your own place a driving license and your shit somewhat in order is enough to impress a 17 year old.

Try that on a 30 year old
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toji Suzuhara
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back