Debate user "Null" on the morality of "discouraging" users - Go be a n̶i̶g̶g̶e̶r̶ troll somewhere else

Time 4 Guillotines said:
That's why we're here. If a Kiwi Farm was a single person it'd be a schizophrenic tard with higher than average pattern recognition skills

So your socks only go to your knees instead of your thighs?
Click to expand...
Given im real honest woman...

Plain old ankle socks.

What can I say?

I'm sure I'm less good at coding than *checks notes* people on cross sex hormones who reddit all day?

Damn. Now I'm sad. :(
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Layton Mysteries, Time 4 Guillotines and The Hero of Kvatch
its ideal for 15 year old spergs that discover a place they can be edgy and decide to spam your forum. the only time i had it backfire was when one particularly devoted kid wasnt discouraged but just spammed the mods harder to let them know "something was wrong with the site"
 
Null said:
I had tried it in the past (prior 2016) but traditional systems for dealing with persistent nuisance users are more effective.
Click to expand...
I remember either you or someone else talking about it way early on, probably 2015.
i always assumed you still did that to this day
 
  • Agree
Reactions: derpherp2
Say the discourage feature was active. Would it be better or worse if it was announced or a known "feature" of the site.
If Josh needs an idea for the next April Fools it could be fun.....or life ruining.
 
I know some mentally discouraged people who get delayed all the time in real life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back