Democrats are Simps

[Ivan Shatov]

It just occurred to me, Democrats are all Simps.

Supporters are putting donations into political candidates promising social reform. The executive and legislative platform consists of:

- Open Borders, an attempt at reverse colonization.
- Globalization, an attempt to send jobs overseas in exchange for cheap manufactured goods.
- Medicare for All, an attempt to overwhelm the health system so that people receive less care.
- New Green Deal, an attempt to eliminate the economy in favor of cooler temperatures.
- Equity and Inclusion, an attempt to expel all existing cultural norms in the name of diversity.
- Disarmament, an attempt to remove the threat of military force from international dealings.
- Gun and Speech Control, an attempt to greatly reduce the rights articulated in the Constitution.

In each case, voters are being asked to give something up in exchange for a net negative. They're putting communities, professions, healthcare, the economy, culture, defense and Constitution at risk in pursuit of an ideal that likely cannot be brought into the world. The scope and breadth of what people are being asked to give up is extraordinary.

Hadn't realized how accurately Simp describes the relationship between the policy and the platform. It's remarkable.

 

[NIGGER ASS PEE POOPY RAPE]

people who don't want to be free shouldn't be forced to be free, they should be imprisoned so they can live in the communist paradise they've always wanted. no currency, free food, shelter, clothing and healthcare provided for them, no weapons are allowed in prison and everyone is perfectly equal. the prisoners could be fed nothing but soylent for every meal and exercise strictly forbidden to ensure nobody has bigger muscles than anyone else for maximum equality. everyone could also be spayed and neutered to ensure no gender inequality and mean words could also be forbidden.

 

[The Last Stand]

You're thinking of outsourcing. Not necessarily the result of globalization. Both parties benefit from that.

America's health care system needs a reform. Start with the pharmacy companies overcharging for medicine, supplies and service.

Isn't it funny that people to CLAIM to be inclusive end up the most bigoted?

 

[Just Some Other Guy]

You're thinking of outsourcing. Not necessarily the result of globalization. Both parties benefit from that.

America's health care system needs a reform. Start with the pharmacy companies overcharging for medicine, supplies and service.

Isn't it funny that people to CLAIM to be inclusive end up the most bigoted?

It's because they constantly have labels for people at the tips of their tongues. Bigots feel the need to assign a label to everyone they meet. Makes it easier to categorize. "This person is X, therefore I can assume this, this, and that, etc".

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Every policy is also a means through which power is obtained and maintained. Look at how Democrats locked down their states during the virus. They aren't simps. They're would-be monarchs.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Look, it's "Democrats are cucks" but with a new buzzword.

 

[Marco Fucko]

Open Borders, an attempt at reverse colonization.

More votes, since the Republican party seems chronically unable to get minorities to vote for them en masse. Same with restoring Felon voting rights.

Globalization, an attempt to send jobs overseas in exchange for cheap manufactured goods.

Lmao the manufacturing jobs are already largely overseas, America is a majority service and professional economy.

Medicare for All, an attempt to overwhelm the health system so that people receive less care.

I agree the consequence of taxpayer funded healthcare would be an overload. Something like 66% of our population is fat and half of that is actual morbid obesity, meaning you would be passing on that cost of caring for lazy fat fucks on to everyone. I guess the actual solution to this is to force people to not be pigs through things like stricter food regulation and suggestive taxing/subsidizing, but that violates muh freedumbs.

New Green Deal, an attempt to eliminate the economy in favor of cooler temperatures.

AOC put forth the Green New Deal and it was denied with extreme bipartisan prejudice.

Equity and Inclusion, an attempt to expel all existing cultural norms in the name of diversity.

I don't know what you're talking about here. Diversity isn't going to stop niggers from going "SHIET" or chinks from pushing their kids into med school.

Disarmament, an attempt to remove the threat of military force from international dealings.

No seriously what the fuck are you talking about? Saber rattling and international intervention is still pretty normal.

Gun and Speech Control, an attempt to greatly reduce the rights articulated in the Constitution.

From the firearms end, it's an extremely useful rhetorical device to paint your opponent as evil and quite frankly it's worked on a lot of people on the street. That being said, it would be more effective to tackle issues related to poverty, since most gun crime comes out of gangland shootings. On the speech side, I don't know what to tell you. Social Media censorship is being done by private companies and social justice REEEEEing is being done by spoiled college kids.

In each case, voters are being asked to give something up in exchange for a net negative.

So are Democrats the party that promises free shit for an easy win or the party that promises a brighter tomorrow by sacrificing today? Because I've heard both and I'm pretty sure less socioeconomic guarantees and austerity are a conservative thing.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Every policy is also a means through which power is obtained and maintained. Look at how Democrats locked down their states during the virus. They aren't simps. They're would-be monarchs.

This is it. The Democrats are constantly pushing for shit they know pushes them into the advantage and advances their power.

 

[Ivan Shatov]

Every policy is also a means through which power is obtained and maintained. Look at how Democrats locked down their states during the virus. They aren't simps. They're would-be monarchs.

Not talking about the politicians here, this is about the constituents.

The leadership is taking advantage of past accomplishments of the party to sell people on an agenda that makes them completely submissive to social policy. They're asking the polity to donate all their political capital for something sexy that doesn't benefit them.

So Democrat voters are simps. If the party wins an election, they intend to drag the rest of us down to this level. Imaging Nancy's rictus grin over a North America-sized chartreuse strap on being rammed up the anus through your mouth. That's what these simps want, they want you in love with that image.

 

[A Welsh Cake]

Anarchies-Monarchism is the only non-cuck non-simp non-bigoted non-alt right non-libtard political opinion as deigned by divine right.

 

[Superman93]

OP is a faggot and isn't using the word correctly.

people who don't want to be free shouldn't be forced to be free, they should be imprisoned so they can live in the communist paradise they've always wanted. no currency, free food, shelter, clothing and healthcare provided for them, no weapons are allowed in prison and everyone is perfectly equal. the prisoners could be fed nothing but soylent for every meal and exercise strictly forbidden to ensure nobody has bigger muscles than anyone else for maximum equality. everyone could also be spayed and neutered to ensure no gender inequality and mean words could also be forbidden.

lol shut up

 

[Calandrino]

Look, it's "Democrats are cucks" but with a new buzzword.

OP is a faggot and isn't using the word correctly.

You know, if somebody could go ahead and clarify, in detail, how "simp" is different from "cuck" or "beta" or "soyboy," I really think I would still not care I guess, you probably shouldn't bother sorry.

 

[{o}P II]

I refuse to listen to any political argument that uses buzzwords like "simp"

 

[Spiteful Crow]

Listen to this faggot

Give me muh UBI, muh free college, muh free healthcare NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW

 

[byuu]

Listen to this faggot

Give me muh UBI, muh free college, muh free healthcare NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW
View attachment 1318211

based neets

 

[Ivan Shatov]

I refuse to listen to any political argument that uses buzzwords like "simp"

Probably hits too close to home.

I imagine some Simps resent how much they lose in the bargain. Letting all that political capital be funneled away because some bossy activist know-nothings use cattle calls to keep them donating to that sexy Utopia to come. Trying to keep it all together under these conditions must be a nightmare, no wonder Schumer looks like a ghoul.

 

[Scratch This Nut]

This thought is remarkably shallow.

 

[Ivan Shatov]

This thought is remarkably shallow.

No, I'm serious. The executive and legislative agendas are purely focused on giving up superiority in characteristic aspects of the American experience in return for nothing but achieving an ideal.

If Simp is not the right word, suggest a better one. I can't think of a concept that better expresses the ethos of the Democrat Party right now. They're Simps.

 

[Scratch This Nut]

Every policy is also a means through which power is obtained and maintained. Look at how Democrats locked down their states during the virus. They aren't simps. They're would-be monarchs.

Why are only democrats being blamed for this? The governor of my state is a Republican and he was one of the first to issue a lockdown.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Why are only democrats being blamed for this? The governor of my state is a Republican and he was one of the first to issue a lockdown.

Because democratic governors are bigger attention whores over how they managed their lock downs and policies relating to it.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Why are only democrats being blamed for this? The governor of my state is a Republican and he was one of the first to issue a lockdown.

Because the most egregious abuses of power have come from Democrats (e.g., New York, Michigan, California). But you're right in that regard- politicians go into the profession because they want power, regardless if which party they belong to.