Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Agreed. Tabletop gaming is firmly between Warhammer proprietary series and Battletech, both settings are pretty interesting in their own way. Warhammer 40K (and other GW games really) are already generic fantasy world that Goth people love because everything is dark and depressing. Battletech is for military autists that actually wonder about things like engineering and strategic vision. So anything sci-fi is a filled niche. Generic fantasy means competing with GW's War of the Ring license.

Battletech has taken a pretty big nose dive since they let the troons invade it and push people out. The Merc KS will be last bit of kit of theirs I buy the rest will be 3d printing and seven seas for the source books.

What sealed it was when Pardoe was removed for his political views and then the troon stories in a few of the new Battletechnogy mags, add to that when Bill's flat out stated he wanted to support retail more than the KS backers and we'll get less stuff than the Clans KS.


As an aside not all of us leafs are pants on head retarted like ShortFatDev, unfortunately other than in a few online spaces we can't speak up without the risks of losing our jobs or other various commie tactics being used.
 
I've always despised that commie mantra. I draw abstract paintings as a hobby and none of them have any political meaning in the slightest. The paint just flows onto the canvas until I stop when I think it looks nice.

They'd say some shit about how you having the ability to engage in such a bourgeois hobby as painting entirely meaningless things is political because if represents a cushy life that would only be possible due to the enslavement and exploitation of the masses (bonus points if said masses are black) and therefore your paintings lay bare the fact you're a filthy, unrepenting colonizer who probably votes for Trump.

It doesn't have to make sense. It doesn't even need any connection to reality. It's all a game of political mad libs in order to justify their hatred for anyone not on their side (and eventually everybody on their side too).
 
I've always despised that commie mantra. I draw abstract paintings as a hobby and none of them have any political meaning in the slightest. The paint just flows onto the canvas until I stop when I think it looks nice.

You think you're in the clear to Dev just because it's abstract?
1. Quite clearly, this is north America in a pre-civilization ice age, a political commentary on the role of man made climate change.
2. Ahh, very clever first with zigzags representing the intrusive and destructive force of cancer. It is making a political statement that we are a cancer on this green Earth, and are killing it.
3. You show us the spirits of mother nature—a magenta wolf, a yellow and red stag, a yellow cheetah, an indigo manta ray, and a purple monkey. This is, of course, political commentary on the mass genocide of animals due to humans, and advocating for climate and population restrictions.
4. Hmm, very interesting. You depict mother nature's natural disasters— wildfire, tsunamis, hurricanes, volcanic eruptions— making the political statement that she is fighting back against man made climate change
So, you see, it's futile to argue against people who've adopted an "everything is political" mindset since they could assign a vapid political undertones to your half eaten lunch.

ETA. Also, that message can be anything they want, and always done to re-enforce their preexisting worldview.
 
I've always despised that commie mantra. I draw abstract paintings as a hobby and none of them have any political meaning in the slightest. The paint just flows onto the canvas until I stop when I think it looks nice.

They would say something faggoty like you spit in the face of the mundane traditions showing a disdain for boundaries both pre and post modern. An eclectic spirit that feels jagged angles the same as cellular curves and expresses itself through colour that is as violent as it is joyful. A staggering dismantling of modern day mental walls built by MAGA fascism and Trumpist Christian Nationalism. Dev specifically would say it's about buttholes and the search for a penis on a woman.
These are actually really good paintings, I like them a lot, very beautiful.
 
I'm a bigger fan of historical war games, particularly around the civil war. You actually learn some useful history, and the battles are usually more complicated because it's inherently a legacy format.
Yes historical wargaming is the best though. I will say tho if your in the UK, Australia or Canada you have to be very careful about what conflicts you play and paint and who you play with, show your models too etc. People have got slapped with hate speech charges for painting bad guys
 
Just to expand a little further on the all art is political thing. The blue guy I drew was a complete accident. I got a set of blue pens and just decided to make an all blue picture. When I was coloring in the background I realized that the white spot that was left on the canvas looked like the silhouette of some weird creature with its mouth agape so I just drew a wavy pattern onto it and called it a day after I thought it looked good. It's completely innocent childlike stuff. That's why I enjoy drawing random things like that so much, it's escapism completely divorced from the rational world.
These are actually really good paintings, I like them a lot, very beautiful.
Aww thanks man.
 
Last edited:
After his centrist mask slipped due to his Pikamee Fiasco, and after harrasing Corey comperatore's family and his FAG-OP on Kirsche's being exposed, he is now been sucking on Wu's mantit.
Don't forget the attempting to downplay the Budlight shitfest
 
Ride Never Ends.

1728766917184.jpeg


Also:

1728766972514.png


 
You think you're in the clear to Dev just because it's abstract?
1. Quite clearly, this is north America in a pre-civilization ice age, a political commentary on the role of man made climate change.
2. Ahh, very clever first with zigzags representing the intrusive and destructive force of cancer. It is making a political statement that we are a cancer on this green Earth, and are killing it.
3. You show us the spirits of mother nature—a magenta wolf, a yellow and red stag, a yellow cheetah, an indigo manta ray, and a purple monkey. This is, of course, political commentary on the mass genocide of animals due to humans, and advocating for climate and population restrictions.
4. Hmm, very interesting. You depict mother nature's natural disasters— wildfire, tsunamis, hurricanes, volcanic eruptions— making the political statement that she is fighting back against man made climate change
So, you see, it's futile to argue against people who've adopted an "everything is political" mindset since they could assign a vapid political undertones to your half eaten lunch.

ETA. Also, that message can be anything they want, and always done to re-enforce their preexisting worldview.
This is proof that nothing is political, and it is rather the person who is political and seeks justification for his belief, therefore making it possible to intepret anything through a political lens.
 
This is proof that nothing is political, and it is rather the person who is political and seeks justification for his belief, therefore making it possible to intepret anything through a political lens.
There is an interesting saying I saw, or rather remember from long ago: "If everything is art, then nothing is art.", talking about modern """""art""""". And since the debauchery of modern art is very fitting with neomarxists of today (cultural marxism, whatever you may call it), you can say the same thing: "if everything is a political battlefield, then nothing is." I would expand upon that if someone becomes a footsoldier of the... ahem, "revolution", then he must be dealt with. The problem is when that backfires and you "deal with 1, only for 10 more to appear". You know?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: liam dees
This is proof that nothing is political, and it is rather the person who is political and seeks justification for his belief, therefore making it possible to intepret anything through a political lens.
It's in the same vein of "Silence is Violence", which is a slogan designed to malign apathy or neutrality and get you to support them. If you're not with us then you're against us.
By stating that your actions absent context are a political action they're just low key trying to justify their rhetoric and eventual violence against you.
On a lesser note it also happens to justify deplatforming. You're pointing out trends and statistics of a certain group. Specifically NOT liking them is the equivalent of a violent crime, even if you've never done anything to them but talk shit.
 
This is proof that nothing is political, and it is rather the person who is political and seeks justification for his belief, therefore making it possible to intepret anything through a political lens.
It's in the same vein of "Silence is Violence", which is a slogan designed to malign apathy or neutrality and get you to support them. If you're not with us then you're against us.
By stating that your actions absent context are a political action they're just low key trying to justify their rhetoric and eventual violence against you.
It's also not thought out. It's why even normies can make their whole tirade collapse by asking "what's the politics of Tetris?" or any other media they can't twist into a political message.

Or to put it in image format.

All Art Is Political.png
 
It's also not thought out. It's why even normies can make their whole tirade collapse by asking "what's the politics of Tetris?" or any other media they can't twist into a political message.

Or to put it in image format.

View attachment 6516748
To play devil's advocate here, I believe the reason why left leaning people make things that look like life is strange, dustborn, and magical spice girls or whatever (that western "anime" crynchyroll produced), is because they see so many people attracted to and supporting anime artwork that looks like this (pale skin, pleasing features) and they want to promote outright ugliness instead (vitiligo and homosexual negroes). Essentially they just hate conventional beauty standards. If the pic was of a brown skinned, vitiligo ridden, purple haired genderspecial eating a burger, would you still see nothing special about it?
 
Back