Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

I know Furbus wants Ayadin and Scrump to do something similar, but if something's 4 hours long, at least have a tldw version or something.
I really didnt tought of that, i would rather hope they dont fall into the same pit as Dev and actually get their Video exposse done right, even f it comes early next year.

the fact is that ACE was able to get to the point and show what Dev got wrong, what he lied about and what he left out, all in just 10 minutes, considering the sacrifice it was to inspect the whole 4 hour manifesto dev shat out.
 
No it isn't

You're literally ignoring the fact of one's a warrior, the other is a civilian.
Are you forgetting the boons/affinities given in the game per class?
Not biologically accurate nor any reason given to suspend disbelief. Women are weak physically. The strongest female warrior is at best a 12 strength character but requiring the same training as a 17 strength man.
If we follow the logic that woke requires "intent". And the only reason you would have a strong woman isn't because this is what the customers want to see or that it sells, but instead it's because you believe that by having strong women, in fiction it influences women behaviour irl, then no D&D was not woke.
The fem fatale amazonian woman was designed to appeal to the demographic of geeks, not to try and make a statement on how women should be like in society.
Unintentional wokism happens too. But today its a minority. D&D only wanted to pander to its audience for a good product, so it made its questionable "both sexes are equally capable and possible in our world". This is a feminist slogan, regardless if the original creators are or not.

Amazonians in culture were always huntresses in jungles, not warriors. It makes sense that backward cultures would have tribes delegating military and physically taxing activities for women.
 
Not biologically accurate nor any reason given to suspend disbelief. Women are weak physically. The strongest female warrior is at best a 12 strength character but requiring the same training as a 17 strength man.

Unintentional wokism happens too. But today its a minority. D&D only wanted to pander to its audience for a good product, so it made its questionable "both sexes are equally capable and possible in our world". This is a feminist slogan, regardless if the original creators are or not.

Amazonians in culture were always huntresses in jungles, not warriors. It makes sense that backward cultures would have tribes delegating military and physically taxing activities for women.
You're supposed to suspend disbelief because the adventurers are superhuman from level 1, able to perform feets that normal NPC peasants cannot.
Anyway, the purpose of the game is to make hot characters that the players like. It was not to send the message that women are equal to men. This was done for balance reasons. If you don't see the diference between that and them making mexican orcs then I don't know what to tell you.
 
You're supposed to suspend disbelief because the adventurers are superhuman from level 1, able to perform feets that normal NPC peasants cannot.
Anyway, the purpose of the game is to make hot characters that the players like. It was not to send the message that women are equal to men. This was done for balance reasons. If you don't see the diference between that and them making mexican orcs then I don't know what to tell you.
Aren't Mexicans dwarves and Black people orcs?
 
You're supposed to suspend disbelief because the adventurers are superhuman from level 1, able to perform feets that normal NPC peasants cannot.
Anyway, the purpose of the game is to make hot characters that the players like. It was not to send the message that women are equal to men. This was done for balance reasons. If you don't see the diference between that and them making mexican orcs then I don't know what to tell you.
Well excuse me sir for having my suspension of disbelief broken that women can be as strong, intelligent or determined as men in a fictional setting that gives zero reasoning for that, while games that give penalties and bonuses depending on race, sex and upbringing are the perfection of the trope
 
Back on topic, please......

1729910101865.png
1729910293093.png
1729910327326.png


Shit Highlight
1729910407382.png
 
Last edited:
Dev is on the Archcast with Arch talking about the JRE podcast with Trump. Literally just after Dev dropped his meltdown video. Absolute kek.

I HATE DEV, and i am starting to hate Arch for being such a rechid scummy spinless opportunist, keeping up a scummy excuse of a human caricature that is Dev for the Hate Pay Pigs.

EDIT: OH GOD! Dev is saying (In Destiny's babbling tone) ''if, IF, that election does get called, You'll see the Trucker Video''...............................................

Dev DESERVES to be violently beat up!

OK, I know i HATED when people were off-topiquing with DnD nonsese i dont care about, i recognize in advance my own hypocrisy here, BUT FUCK IS THIS?

1729980816331.png


I HATE YOUTUBE ASTROTURFING, FUCK THE LEFT!
 
OK, I know i HATED when people were off-topiquing with DnD nonsese i dont care about, i recognize in advance my own hypocrisy here, BUT FUCK IS THIS?

View attachment 6565269

I HATE YOUTUBE ASTROTURFING, FUCK THE LEFT!
Oh this guy.

He gives me very suspect vibes.
Seen a few videos here and there, but couldn't finish them.

Like these videos

Seems like softballing for Sneako and Child marriage.
 
Seems like softballing for Sneako and Child marriage.
I get the vibe of him treating Sneako as a literal retard while treating Charlie as a normal person. As in, it is expected Sneako has retarded takes so they aren't worth mentioning.
But it is worth mentioning when said retard manages to corner a non-retard into indefensible position. And tbh Charlie's stated position is much worse than Sneako's in that talk. You can get out of marriage and still live normal life. You can't unsnip your missing penis.

But yeah, I, Hipocrite has strange patterns in his vids. Haven't watched him much but there is no clear consistent position I can see from him. Feels like a grifter more than an activist.
 
I sincerely cannot fathom how Dev thinks of himself as a centrist. An actual centrist would have times where one can say, "the right is more correct on this issue." But there is never a point in which Dev concedes any real correct points on the right. He only ever attacks and diminishes the right, while his criticism of the left remains in a manner that appears as if he would rather cleanse the left of its bullshit so he can get back to the 00s left-wing politics. Can anyone think of a single position where he is in nearly full agreement with the current right? Not agreement with caveats, not a "kinda sorta" agreement, I mean an actual alignment with the current right on an issue that significantly matters to him. I can't think of any at all.

Also, he just outright denies the corruption on the J6 Committee even though it has been publicly established that they withheld evidence that would be helpful to Trump's case. Any centrist in support of the truth would at least acknowledge this was a thing that happened. Dev really just lacks even the most basic level of humility to ever admit he is wrong about anything, huh?
 
Is he the actually the latter? or is this namecalling because he likes Loli? remember dude, THE CLOCK!

Anyways.....

View attachment 6566488
You are right I was too quick to call him a pedo. He is a lolicon though.
He has stated before that he was going through treatment for POCD. POCD means Pedophile-themed Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. And his therapist used lolicon as treatment. :cryblood:
 
Back