Found this quite funny from his weekly seethe, touching upon possible future content on Kirsche:
"it's just two retards fighting"
This has not been the first, nor will it be the last time Dev attempts a false equivalence when talking about Internet controversies.
Why do I say this? Simple. What is the moral character of Kirsche or Valens like? Your answer to this question determines how much you know about these two individuals and also if you understand why Kirsche opposed Valens.
Firstly, Kirsche is standing up for free speech, specifically HER free speech. Her right to criticise Clown World, or more pertinently to this matter, mocking someone who was plenty deserving of mocking. She has made a career out of doing this. It's as positive an argument for free speech, and for the marketplace of ideas as you can get.
Meanwhile, Valens represents the authority figure, high off his "influence" anointed to him and an unscrupulous person. He publicly engages in degeneracy and pushes his agendas using his anointed position as "journalist". A man who believes he is a woman. A pedophile who writes condemning drawn CP. A living contradiction, living up to the definition of "unscrupulous".
So, Kirsche belittles and exposes Valens' proclivities. The woman with free speech mocks and denigrates a mentally ill man in "authoritative" position. Naturally, Valens feels personally threatened by this indiscretion. He may have the anointed position, but the mandate of heaven rests on the anime foxu. After all his "work", he still inevitably gets blown out by a woman. What do you think such an insecure heathen will do in reaction? A rhetorical question because we have seen what people like him do, time and again.
Now back to Dev. Who is he following and defending, and who has he misrepresented, defamed and not so secretly endorsed a cancellation attempt against?
I wonder why Dev would do something like this. Truly.
_________
Also, ACE posted yet another video on Dev.
(D'oh, I've been ninja'd!)
