On the one hand, I can very well understand why a lot of people would want a monarchic system, with valid reasoning. Especially in current times, where "democratically elected representatives" don't seem to really represent anyone but themselves and their billion dollar lobbyists, while ignoring general issues of economics, politics, culture, etc. I don't care what you say, Trump saying mean shit about progs on Twitter or Truth Social is NOT addressing the cultural issues in the US.
On the other hand, Spoon and most of not all of the internet monarchists are fucking fags and would be the neo-serf class in such a monarchist state. They all seem to think that somehow, if the current state was overthrown, and a king was put in place, he would be the ideal mixture of Marcus Aurelius, Charles the Great, Cyrus the Great, Alexander the Great, and well, all the other "The Great"s. Nobody seems to ask "hey, what if this guy is actually an unholy mixture of Commodus, Caligula, King John, Tsar Nicholas, Ivan the Terrible, and all the other fuckers who would oppress me without a single thought."
They figure the monarch system would have the cream of the crop, forgetting that many monarchs who rose up are the same kinda faggots who used connections and charisma to rise to power with the support of their "aristocracy", i.e. most of the politicians of today.
I wonder how many of these internet monarchists would be a-ok if their new "ruler by divine right" is Hillary-motherfucking-Clinton. Or Obama. These are politically competent people who know how to shake the right hands and promise the right things to get into power. Remember just how many of the political class were on Hillary's side back in 2016; to the extent she fucked Bernie Sanders and still got him to kiss her ring. She would absolutely steal the crown and I doubt these internet monarch fags would be "with her" on that.
Or hell, to pull it back in to the faggot-in-chief in this thread; imagine how these monarchists would react if "their God chose" DEV of all people. I can imagine they'd go full 'end of days; God is dead!' if such a proclamation were to hit the streets; they would not accept him, because he is not /theirguy/.
None of these internet monarchic faggots ever consider what would happen if the people they dislike would be enough of a snake to fulfil the criteria and ascend the throne. And then get ass-mad when people go "dude, that shit is no guarantee of solving the problem. It's a fucking dice-roll, where a 1 or 2 means shit's fucked, 3-4 is 'things kinda continue' and 5-6 is 'things improve.' Democracy is switching the D6 for a D100, but now, 1-20 is 'shit's fucked, 80-100 is 'things improve' and the rest is all 'things kinda continue.'"
And all of this without considering other factors within the monarchic systems that these people often do not consider down and dirty parts such as succession crises, balancing peasantry desires vs aristocratic desires, etc.