Did Hitler Have The Right Idea, But The Wrong Means?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Where can I get the Truth that is not fanfiction written by Allies and Soviets?
The idea that any one source will have an untarnished truth is very optimistic. But if you want to get an alternate perspective, you could do worse than say, ron unz's website or david irving's books. Just try and consider the motivations for each writing source that you evaluate.

Irving's books in particular are vouched for their accuracy. Considering that people wealthy enough to make hollywood movies about how icky he is and how they went with a fine toothed comb through the claims in his books and were only able to establish a handful of minor details he got wrong, some of his works will stand the test of time, if you can manage to get your hands on them.

But even then, never forget to consider the perspective of the man writing or the sources he employed.
 
Last edited:
In my opinion this was the greatest thing to come out of Germany in the 20th century:
View attachment 1149909

I've seen this thing cross a flooded street in a way that would have made most modern cars stall and shutdown with total engine failure/loss.
I always wanted a Thing
AUT-23-RK0446-03P.JPG
 
If he had simply stopped after taking back historically German territory from his neighbors (and did it on the sly), he would have avoided war, or at least kept Russia off his border and forced them to strike first.

If he had captured the Brits at Dunkirk instead of letting them be rescued he would have gotten Britain to surrender.

If he had dumped all the Jews and Gypsies on boats to Britain or in Polish territory he could have avoided concentration camps.

If he had engaged in a campaign of sabotage in his enemies territory he could have degraded their warfighting ability and assassinated leaders who were pro-war.

If he had sent light infantry to lead insurgencies in colonies, he could have split British and French forces and kept them off him long enough to defeat Russia.

If he had used Russian auxiliaries embedded with German light infantry, focused on insurgency/sabotage/assassination, and made better use of propaganda (war of liberation against communism instead of war of annihilation against non-Germans, kill your officers and surrender) he could have caused an uprising against Stalin.

If he had gave his commanders more freedom to set goals, strategy, logistics, and tactics he could have avoided a ton of blunders.

If he hadn't killed so many Germans he would have had more manpower later in the war.

If he had kept up military production -especially of defensive armaments - then instead of invading Russia to preempt Russias planned invasion, he could have (along with earlier points I made) let Russia instead invade Poland and sold them weapons. When Britain inevitably sided with Russia, he could have used that as evidence that Britain is a bad ally and gained Poland as an ally, and maybe made the French doubt Britain.

If he had focused on annihilating the RAF after Dresden instead of retaliatory bombing of civilians, he could have destroyed Britain's offensive air abilities and kept the moral high ground.

If he had consolidated his superweapons research he could have beat us to the atomic bomb.

If he had allowed actual mathematicians and engineers to design his cryptographic systems instead of dilettantes, he could have kept his codes unbreakable for the entire war.

Basically Hitler was an a.utistic micromanager and he dun fuked up.
Well, you know, scientifically speaking...
 
I knew this website was fulled with liberals, conservative cucks, and normies, but I'm really taken aback by all the misinformation and outright pilpul on display in this thread. Its time to grow up, and let go of all the ZOG lies you were force fed in grade school and learn some real history. I recommend the unbiased independent history series The Greatest Story Never Told. It should be up on bitchute, because ((((THEY))) on (((THEM)))tube don't want you to know the truth.
 
I knew this website was fulled with liberals, conservative cucks, and normies, but I'm really taken aback by all the misinformation and outright pilpul on display in this thread. Its time to grow up, and let go of all the ZOG lies you were force fed in grade school and learn some real history. I recommend the unbiased independent history series The Greatest Story Never Told. It should be up on bitchute, because ((((THEY))) on (((THEM)))tube don't want you to know the truth.

I regret informing you but bitchute has started shadow censoring videos. For instance, you'd be able to find all of Mr. Bond's stuff there, now you can't.
 
Had Hitler focused on the wellbeing of his people and not been a murderous psychopath with the intent of invading his neighboring countries, he would have been fine.
The problem was that a lot of his people and former German territories where in other neighbouring countries.
 
Whine all you want about this clip being JP but I’m inclined to believe him here.

Tell Jordan Peterson that Solschenizyn was right about Bolshevism, and he'll agree without a second thought.
Tell him Solschenizyn was right about Judeo-Bolshevism, he'll lose his freaking mind.

Or rather, he would, if he hadn't fried his junkie-brain already....
 
I knew this website was fulled with liberals, conservative cucks, and normies, but I'm really taken aback by all the misinformation and outright pilpul on display in this thread. Its time to grow up, and let go of all the ZOG lies you were force fed in grade school and learn some real history. I recommend the unbiased independent history series The Greatest Story Never Told. It should be up on bitchute, because ((((THEY))) on (((THEM)))tube don't want you to know the truth.
I watched that last month. It was the stupidest video I have seen in years.
 
Adolf Hitler is a somewhat polarizing figure.

Was he an authoritarian dictator who attempted genocide on a people that have been kicked out of a 109 countries for abusing usury and subverting culture?

Or was he just a misunderstood genius who made several poor military tactical decisions including trusting the United States when we promised to be neutral?

I don't know, but I do know that the man had iconic style and almost won a war against the world. Who among us could be so bold?

hitler speech2.jpg


Read Siege by James Mason.
 
Well james mason is a neo nazi with a fondness for child porn and banging 16 years olds so I'm going to guess he's going to be pro-Hitler and it's probably not very good.
What is it with neo nazis and child rape? Christ, it's almost like they're all terrible people with no redeeming values.
 
I'm lazy, give me a summary.
The book (Siege) promotes the creation of autonomous terror cells fighting a guerilla war against “the system” under the common banner of the White Liberation Front. Mason praises the Manson Family murders and Dan White—who murdered San Francisco Mayor George Moscone and gay rights leader Harvey Mil.k—as “direct action.” The second chapter of Siege focuses on violent revolution and political terrorism, while other chapters glorify Manson and Adolf Hitler.
 
I'm lazy, give me a summary.

-Change can only be accomplished through revolution and violence.

-Stupid people are more dangerous than any time bomb.

-Never forget the number one priority of any revolutionary: to maintain; to survive at all costs.

-Let the cities go to Hell, right where they came from!

-The Jews wish Adolf Hitler had been theirs.

-White people >>>>>

“The lost man, who has no belongings, no outside interests, no personal ties of any sort – not even a name. Possessed of but one thought, interest and passion – the revolution. A man who has broken with Society, broken with its laws and conventions. He must despise the opinions of others, and be prepared for death and torture at any time. Hard towards himself, he must be hard to others, and in his heart there must be no place for love, friendship, gratitude or even honor.”
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Suburban Bastard
-Change can only be accomplished through revolution and violence.

-Stupid people are more dangerous than any time bomb.

-Never forget the number one priority of any revolutionary: to maintain; to survive at all costs.

-Let the cities go to Hell, right where they came from!

-The Jews wish Adolf Hitler had been theirs.

-White people >>>>>

“The lost man, who has no belongings, no outside interests, no personal ties of any sort – not even a name. Possessed of but one thought, interest and passion – the revolution. A man who has broken with Society, broken with its laws and conventions. He must despise the opinions of others, and be prepared for death and torture at any time. Hard towards himself, he must be hard to others, and in his heart there must be no place for love, friendship, gratitude or even honor.”
.............cool, sounds rètarded.
 
The Madagascar plan would have been a lot more practical as far as the Jews themselves were concerned. It wouldn't have drawn so much flak, and you could have drug out the worst offending Jews to the public sphere to make it clear that they really deserved worse than what they were getting with the plan. In addition, the disputed land claims could have either been settled by land trading, or by convincing the local populations that annexation was in their best interests, which would have been especially easy to do in the Eastern territories since you had the commie Jews in Russia sperging out, and killing white Christians. Really, with a little bit of patience and tact Hitler could have gotten exactly what he wanted, and put his enemies in the same position as what he ended up in. By doing this, he could have made the war into a binary white Christian V.S. Marxist Jew war which would have ended horribly for the USSR.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Suburban Bastard
Back