Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.4%
  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 57 3.6%
  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,088 68.9%

  • Total voters
    1,578
I don't know if anyone else sees it but she has a terrible, highly visible case of FASD. I don't know what is it with Disney but they make eyes look disgusting lately, I started noticing it with the Incredibles 2.
Pixar in general has always done eyes terribly IMO. Go watch Brave and look at how "uncanny valley" all of the characters eyes are. I know that their earlier films were limited by tech, but they really haven't improved at all. The eyes in Luca have the same issue and looking at the stills from this sequel - it's the same ugly, lifeless eyes again.
 
But the real question is, would his toxicity (real or imagined; the tales of Lassiter and Carano tell us that no toxicity is actually required for a Disney excommunication) have had any adverse consequences if he hadn't criticised the Witcher's writers' room for its dislike and disregard of the source material?

This is a company that has no problem with, and rewards, toxicity as long as its directed at "the right people". It's even about to release and celebrate the work of Harvey Wienstien's personal enabler. Unless or course the public position becomes untenable and you have to be Kang'ed.
 
But the real question is, would his toxicity (real or imagined; the tales of Lassiter and Carano tell us that no toxicity is actually required for a Disney excommunication) have had any adverse consequences if he hadn't criticised the Witcher's writers' room for its dislike and disregard of the source material?

This is a company that has no problem with, and rewards, toxicity as long as its directed at "the right people". It's even about to release and celebrate the work of Harvey Wienstien's personal enabler. Unless or course the public position becomes untenable and you have to be Kang'ed.
Yeah I wonder about that too. Was he being to based and uppity or are they getting in front of a potential sex crime shit show?
 
But the real question is, would his toxicity (real or imagined; the tales of Lassiter and Carano tell us that no toxicity is actually required for a Disney excommunication) have had any adverse consequences if he hadn't criticised the Witcher's writers' room for its dislike and disregard of the source material?

This is a company that has no problem with, and rewards, toxicity as long as its directed at "the right people". It's even about to release and celebrate the work of Harvey Wienstien's personal enabler. Unless or course the public position becomes untenable and you have to be Kang'ed.
Yeah I wonder about that too. Was he being to based and uppity or are they getting in front of a potential sex crime shit show?
According to Twitter, he's more or less a self-hating gay.

He was hitting on this one other gay writer and saying things like " Bottoms are disease devours" and getting into slap fights with people who weren't into race-swapping .
 
1710416435781.jpeg

Enteral 2 might be canceled.
 
"Less risks with their movies and more guaranteed hits."

Well, good luck with that.
They fucking turned ETERNALS into bland non-risky cookie cutter shlock. None of the characters were the same to the point it was a fucking name slap of a movie with their main marketing point being it was the "FIRST MARVEL MOVIE TO CONTAIN A SEX SCENE!" Despite all this, the lesson they took from it was "oh we need to make movies less risky"? Just fucking give up at that point!
 
Last edited:
View attachment 5814742
Enteral 2 might be canceled.

But the first one literally saved lives. Kevin Fiege and Bob Iger are clearly complicit in the troon genocide.

Anyway, does this new focus on guaranteed hits (time will tell on that Bobby) mean that Wang Chung 2 (sorry - Shang Chi) and Zegler's Not Snow White will also be scrubbed? I am greatly looking forward to the imminent release of The Acolyte as when I think of guaranteed hits what else could come to mind.
 
They fucking turned ETERNALS into bland non-risky cookie cutter shlock. None of the characters were the same to the point it was a fucking name slap of a movie with their main marketing point being it was the "FIRST MARVEL MOVIE TO CONTAIN A SEX SCENE!" Despite all this, the lesson they took from it was "oh we need to make movies less risky"? Just fucking give up at that point!
I wonder what they consider low risk and guaranteed hits? What classification are they doing? They're so messed up that they simply cannot objectively understand what makes a movie good or bad, how will they avoid risky movies?
 
View attachment 5814742
Enteral 2 might be canceled.
Pretty much the reaper/AXE came because of ike we might be in a frost period all they get for the end of the contract is aforce & maybe young avengers.
1710450951623.png
It’s also important to consider what era Marvel is moving into here. They are about to kick off several extremely important properties from here, namely The Fantastic Four, and then later, their take on the X-Men, in addition to keeping other heroes like Spider-Man and Captain America floating. So in that context, slotting in a fourth Ant-Man movie or Eternals 2 which would probably still cost several hundred million each, seems ill-advised.
We’ve seen this to some extent on Disney Plus, but perhaps not quite to the same lengths yet. She-Hulk does not appear to be getting a second season, as according to its star, Tatiana Maslany, they “blew their budget” on the pricey (but still bad-looking) effects. Loki appears to be over. There will certainly not be a Secret Invasion season 2. Disney still has a few questionable shows coming up, like the idea that people will tune into Agatha, a story far away from mainstream MCU territory based on the villain from WandaVision. Instead, they may focus on more street-level, and probably cheaper content like Echo and the upcoming Daredevil revival, which seems wise.
Most of Marvel’s slate in the next few years is set, even as dates keep shuffling around. But no, I am not shocked these three movies specifically are probably not seeing the light of day.

bree cope
However, I don’t think it’s wise for Marvel to just ditch Brie Larson’s Captain Marvel, and Iman Velani’s Kamala Khan should be given more to do, not less, given how great she is in the role. As for Ant-Man and the Wasp? They can show up as Avengers, I suppose. But Eternals is probably going to have to remain a “what could have been” situation, and I would not expect to see them again.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone remember how The Mandalorian Season 1 worked even if you didn't watch all of Star Wars lore as it only showed the lore in passing, and it was so popular it fucked up Disnay's plan to sell fucked-up bird dolls? Disney needs more shows like that.
 
Back
Top Bottom