Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.5%

  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 57 3.6%

  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,087 68.9%
  • Total voters
    1,577
Further proof of my theory that the stylists actively went out of their way to do a shit job for the live action LM.

This is what the actresses of ariel and ursulas human disguise look like irl
vanessa-jess-05.jpg

Now the one on the left still mogs a little bit, but halle looks nice when shes styled well too, I dont think the looksgap is too big here.

This is what they made ariel look like in the movie:
hq720.jpg maxresdefault.jpg
And this is what they made human! Ursula look like:
images (13).jpeg c48e419129e0101084d47bcaa3100d32.jpg Thiclips.webp
Better colour cohesion, vibrant colours instead of a washed out nightmare, better dress, good wig, good makeup, good lighting... they made her look even better than she did in the animated one. So they are still capable, they just dont want to.
 
SpiderBitch said:
Further proof of my theory that the stylists actively went out of their way to do a shit job for the live action LM.
Click to expand...

The only way it makes sense in my head is that they are too focused on race and woke shit. Which leads to them overthinking, applying woke shitty ideas. Not wanting to impose white beauty standards on black characters and it ultimately leads to them looking worse.

They don't get stuck up on white characters and just do what looks good. With black and POC characters, they intentionally make bad choices and feel validated for doing so.

Then there's the retarded nature of the race swapping. For some reason, they want to keep the red hair, but it won't fit a black actress. So they end up with some reddish, copper type hair color that isn't natural-looking and doesn't look good. We all instinctively know that it doesn't look right. No one would chose that look for themselves.

Then they have to deal with African women's hair is awful and usually fake. So they give her a headband to cover up the hairline and / or wig. Which also looks bad.
 
Purple fur Pomeranian said:
Hey Disney I thought you wanted to ditch your pride month garbage?
Screenshot 2026-01-27 084258.png
Click to expand...
Mickey Visit is a Disney Parks-related blog and I still see some Pride-related merch at Disneyland/DCA when I go there, thankfully it's just their pins that I usually see.

That said they do have "Disneyland After Dark" events where the main park closes to regular ticketed guests early and you have to pay a separate event fee for entry, with one of the themes being Pride Month. Luckily it only takes up two days in June whilst others have even more (this month's After Dark event is Valentine's Day themed and it's completely sold out).
 
SpiderBitch said:
Further proof of my theory that the stylists actively went out of their way to do a shit job for the live action LM.

This is what the actresses of ariel and ursulas human disguise look like irl
View attachment 8478553

Now the one on the left still mogs a little bit, but halle looks nice when shes styled well too, I dont think the looksgap is too big here.

This is what they made ariel look like in the movie:
View attachment 8478548View attachment 8478550
And this is what they made human! Ursula look like:
View attachment 8478557View attachment 8478560View attachment 8478562
Better colour cohesion, vibrant colours instead of a washed out nightmare, better dress, good wig, good makeup, good lighting... they made her look even better than she did in the animated one. So they are still capable, they just dont want to.
Click to expand...
It's like they were trying to de-age her. She's already young, since her age is such a plot point in the original film, and she can act childishly excited about things, but it doesn't make much sense to completely de-sex a character whose story is about her sexual awakening and growing up. Imagine giving her a dress like the masquerade ball scene in Labyrinth, something princess-y and cute that still signifies her crossing over into adulthood and her new life. You don't have to make her look literally 12 to show off her innocence.

I thought they did a decent job growing the Ariel/Eric relationship in the live action version, but I don't remember her being as spunky and flirty as she is in the original. The costumes could have helped with this. She doesn't even get her pink dress! And if they're going to set it in the Caribbean, there's no excuse for it not to be colorful and fun.
 
Purple fur Pomeranian said:
And some Actress is demanding more Troons in Disney Movies.
Click to expand...
Margaret Cho was like the Liz Jones of her day, she's always been an asian woke cunt. she only married because it still wasn't socially acceptable to be a proud and out dyke outside of the internet back in the 90s and 2000s. but she was like one of the earliest like e-celebs. Remember how Adam Baldwin got really invested in gamergate for like a month and then moved on with his life. Imagine if instead he just jumped head first into being an e-celeb

Its actually pretty funny because her immigrant parents moved from asia to the gayest part of san francisco so she never had a real shot at being a normie. But she's probably been all about gays in disney bullshit the last 30 years.
 
Scarlett Johansson said:
Still can't figure out why the Aladdin cartoon was never released on DVD or Disney Plus....
Click to expand...
I don't think I've ever seen a Disney DVD for sale that WASN'T a movie. AFAIK the only collection of cartoons Disney has released is the "Walt Disney Treasures" collection.
Disneytreasures-box.jpg

But even then I don't really trust Disney. Whatever old shorts I see on YouTube regarding audio seems to be re-recorded/edited from what I remember of the originals as a kid.
 
King Dead said:
Nobody is relatable when there is no internal struggle or conflict and they all act like Saturday morning cartoon characters.
Click to expand...
they show the antagonist of the 3rd movie in someone's reticle at least 2 times but the plot required them to not pull the trigger. and then the kids forgot they were in the second movie because there's a hesitancy in killing people or doing stuff they've already done.
 
Celebrate Nite said:
But even then I don't really trust Disney. Whatever old shorts I see on YouTube regarding audio seems to be re-recorded/edited from what I remember of the originals as a kid.
Click to expand...
There was the weird Have a Laugh versions from 2009-2012, where they took old shorts and cut them down in length (because kids couldn't handle 5-6 minutes?) and redubbed them with the contemporary voice actors.

The Walt Disney Treasures are great though. There is a small number of shorts that are cut, but even then some of those cases were mistakes, where there is just a couple of random non-controversial seconds missing and were supposedly later corrected on replacement discs.
 
neverendingmidi said:
You're mixing your "hoods". @Candlelight Desolation said "Red Riding Hood" aka "wolf eating grandma", not "Robin Hood" aka "rob from the rich to give to the poor".
Click to expand...
The bolded line is the complete 20th Century perversion of who Robin Hood really is. As Robin Hood stole robbed the tax collectors had taken the money from the people and returned the money to them.
 
SpiderBitch said:
Allegedly Tangled is gonna be directed by the dude that directed The Greatest Showman, which had a pretty bad plot/story but looked pretty good visually,
Click to expand...
Greatest showman may have had shit plot but like you said the visuals were great and every single song was a crowdpleaser.

The movie felt less like an auter retard director/songwriter wanting to leave his mark on the industry forever by expressing his artistic inner soul and more like a cynical guy that gives 0 fucks about art but knows what people like making a musical popcorn summer movie for the masses. Ironically on point for a musical about PT Barnum.

It may sound like I'm shitting on him but I'm not.

I still have literally all the songs on my phone and listen to them regularily, its rare for every single song in a musical to be this insanely catchy.

I trust the guy tbh.
 
Scarlett Johansson said:
Still can't figure out why the Aladdin cartoon was never released on DVD or Disney Plus....
Click to expand...
It probably isn't on Disney+ for the same reason The House of Mouse isn't: the show is a logistical nightmare when it comes to residuals.

And don't forget that, like the main film and its DTV sequels, it would probably the same content "warning" telling people about potential stereotypes and distasteful scenes that could be present in the show.
Counterfeit Obol said:
Could be related to the whole Robin Williams business when they used Genie without his involvement at some point (I think it was the DtV movies...)
Click to expand...
That's unlikely, Disney replaced Robin Williams with Dan Castellaneta for Return of Jafar and the TV series due to a fallout between Disney and Williams regarding contracts (IIRC it was advertising-related) and being the latter costing less. Williams returned to voice Genie in Forty Thieves but another Disney-Williams fallout occurred after it released which caused Castellaneta to "permanently" inherit the role until he was replaced by Jim Meskimen.
 
I want Dave the Barbarian on Disney Plus. It's been twenty years and I still giggle like an idiot at pedestrian crossing signs.

Also looking forward to the day Pixar stops the weird vendetta they have against Buzz Lightyear of Star Command and let us enjoy that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom