Do you think women should be allowed in the army?

[fatcock burgerking]

Seamstress, cook, PERHAPS radio operator...? Maybe not the last one. In 2012 they offered these three roles to my husband, who's legally blind in one eye. I think women can be trained to do both those jobs. Perhaps the opportunity to be a receptionist for a recruiter?

That's my opinion as an American, in reference to the american military. This would probably only work in first world white countries.

 

[Idiotron]

Only if they look like this:

 

[Paper Machete]

If you don't think that women should compete against men in various sports, it doesn't make sense to then say they should also still be soldiers. Nurses, doctors, and secretary roles as was tradition before is okay. Combat medics have to be able to carry people and are still active in combat situations. They aren't nurses. They're just there to get the injured to the actual nurses, doctors, and otherwise try to keep the injured from dying. I see people trying to say that if they meet the same qualifications as the men it's okay or that they're good at being snipers. Well, guys are already going to be good at being snipers too anyway. It just doesn't make sense. There are some jobs that should just only be for men and that's that. Same as how there are jobs that should only be for women such as kindergarten teachers lol

 

[Staticness]

Yes and no.

Women should be allowed in the army in peacetime because it lets the government tout how progressive it is. They can safely be like thirst brigades safely away from the front.

However, women overall are wholly unsuited to killing people and breaking things and I will not rest easy knowing that women are spilling their life’s blood to promote gay rights in the third world.

 

[Neodanthril]

in a theoretically good state made by and for white people, women should not be in the military, even in noncombatant roles in any situation short of existential total war. it just is going to create fractious competition for sex and spread debilitating venereal diseases.
women are far less replaceable when it comes to perpetuating the population of this theoretical state.

 

[Justa Grata Honoria]

If they can pass the exams and physical bs and NOT LOWERING THE FUCKING STANDARDS FOR THEM . I am very pro equality if you can do the job them you can do the job .

 

[draggs]

Not in roles where they could see combat

 

[JamusActimus]

you would trust a female doctor?

More than a female soldier or bodyguard

 

[God of Nothing]

If you don't think that women should compete against men in various sports, it doesn't make sense to then say they should also still be soldiers.

but you don't understand
how else will they look like girl bosses if they don't ride the coattails of a nonexistant unicorn?

 

[grump]

If they can pass the exams and physical bs and NOT LOWERING THE FUCKING STANDARDS FOR THEM . I am very pro equality if you can do the job them you can do the job .

At lot of hay is made about physical standards and its true that alone disqualifies most female candidates. But even without that a large amount of women entering into an organization fundamentally changes it. The espirit de corps goes down and things tend to become more bureaucratic and impersonal. We've seen this over and over again in academia, campuses, the business world, even in entertainment media where video games now have to be bland and inoffensive (to libtards) etc. Not that I'm specifically blaming women the same probably happens in reverse in the few instances you have men intrude into women dominated spaces. Its a general phenomenon of lowest common denominator you get with sex mixed spaces.

 

[We Are The Witches]

Yes, I don't care about their sex or gender.

All I care is about competent individuals that are qualified after passing physical/psychological/etc tests, equal for all individuals applying for the position.

---

I swear some people go retarded when it comes to sex, which I believe is one of the causes that can make society weaker and stupider.

 

[AgendaPoster]

Only shitlibs, deathfats, TERFs and prostitutes, should be used as frontline shock troops.

 

[Meat Target]

Only if they look like this:
View attachment 6242784
View attachment 6242793
View attachment 6242799

If they can pass the exams and physical bs and NOT LOWERING THE FUCKING STANDARDS FOR THEM . I am very pro equality if you can do the job them you can do the job .

At lot of hay is made about physical standards and its true that alone disqualifies most female candidates. But even without that a large amount of women entering into an organization fundamentally changes it. The espirit de corps goes down and things tend to become more bureaucratic and impersonal. We've seen this over and over again in academia, campuses, the business world, even in entertainment media where video games now have to be bland and inoffensive (to libtards) etc. Not that I'm specifically blaming women the same probably happens in reverse in the few instances you have men intrude into women dominated spaces. Its a general phenomenon of lowest common denominator you get with sex mixed spaces.

Having a battle waifu like Eowyn or Jill Valentine to fight alongside and then make sweet love to after killing motherfuckers is my dream lifestyle.

Sadly, it doesn't work that way, because reality is lame and gay.

 

[I glow in the dark]

Minor powerleveling but when I went to MEPS, every single female trying to join was 5'0 and 90 pounds soaking wet, they were also either fucking dykes or just actual whores, so make of that what you will. In case you're wondering, I never ended up enlisting, probably for the best considering America's military's leadership doesn't like wypipo and they'd prefer filling diversity quotas instead of being effective at the Next Middle Eastern War™.

 

[Suel Forrester]

no. theyre weak, cant handle pressure, are bad at decision making and planning, but perhaps the biggest problem is the logistical nightmare that props up when you consider "feminine hygiene"

put it like this, if women should be allowed in the army, why have 0 good armies in history ever used them in armies?

Only if they look like this:
View attachment 6242784
View attachment 6242793
View attachment 6242799

despite how manly they appear, all of these women still incur the cost and logistical issues of bleeding out of their pussies

 

[Idiotron]

despite how manly they appear, all of these women still incur the cost and logistical issues of bleeding out of their pussies

Is that what you got out of those pics?
Manly?
No, dude, I just want hot buff chicks in the army, that would make me sign up

 

[Suel Forrester]

Is that what you got out of those pics?
Manly?
No, dude, I just want hot buff chicks in the army, that would make me sign up

yes. manly.

theyre acting and looking masculine. you might be gay

 

[Idiotron]

yes. manly.

theyre acting and looking masculine. you might be gay

Ah, you're one of those people who think muscles are only for men.
Whatever works for you.

 

[Suel Forrester]

Ah, you're one of those people who think muscles are only for men.
Whatever works for you.

masculinity is for men. muscles are masculine. i like my women soft, smooth, supple, kissable. im not trying to kiss rocks

 

[Idiotron]

masculinity is for men. muscles are masculine. i like my women soft, smooth, supple, kissable. im not trying to kiss rocks

No, muscles are a part of every human body and how developed they get is up to the individual.