- Joined
- Jul 30, 2024
Do you think women should be allowed in the army?
- Thread starter Rigamaroo
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2018
OK... I'm looking... and?
Women have muscles too and can develop them.
Also, I really think you've never met a fit girl if you think they're manly.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2024
Nigger if you want to fuck a jellyfish then just come out and say it.
Alternatively read an anatomy book to understand how stupid you sound right now.
The only women who have no muscle definition are the morbidly obese and skinny fats and neither type of woman is healthy. Obesity is a known morbidity and mortality risk.
Skinny fat women have a propensity for crazy and end up "suffering" from fibromylagia or some other fictitious disorder.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2024
Max Free
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
If a women is not fit for the army, the army will make her fit for it.
Everyone can serve as cannon fodder in the end.
Everyone can serve as cannon fodder in the end.
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2023
This thread is quickly devolving into a fetish thread. Weird ass niggas.
Would it be a fair assumption that all the bullshit happening on the US army nowadays is a byproduct of women being in the army, if not done by women in higher positions?
You really have to questiom why these women enlist in the first place, considering the fact that homeless veterans are still a problem and that these women can simply whore themselves out for promotions.
I would never enlist even if it meant getting fat stacks in a shitty economy, considering the fact that military fags are incredibly biased and always have a severe case of stockholm syndrome for their drill instructors, which often makes me skeptical on claims of how great "serving in the army" really is.
The fact that standards have decreased to accomodate women may explain why Trannies are now eligble for military service even with the fact that these deranged sex pests are medically expensive to maintain with their hormone blockaz and shieeet.
Women being in the military was a mistake, if there's almost always an inevitability that sexual misconduct involving them will occur. Give the homosexuals their army back. AIDS is preferably easier to treat compared to the logistical nightmare that is STDs and pregnancy. Sexual harassment wouldn't be a fucking thing because straight dudes always act gay with each other as a joke, even buttfucking and molesting each other for lols to an extent.
There is a reason why military women are notorious for promiscuity and infidelity.
Never be in a relationship when you're in the army. Save the melodramatics and accept the fact that you'll become worthless fodder for ZOG.
Would it be a fair assumption that all the bullshit happening on the US army nowadays is a byproduct of women being in the army, if not done by women in higher positions?
You really have to questiom why these women enlist in the first place, considering the fact that homeless veterans are still a problem and that these women can simply whore themselves out for promotions.
I would never enlist even if it meant getting fat stacks in a shitty economy, considering the fact that military fags are incredibly biased and always have a severe case of stockholm syndrome for their drill instructors, which often makes me skeptical on claims of how great "serving in the army" really is.
The fact that standards have decreased to accomodate women may explain why Trannies are now eligble for military service even with the fact that these deranged sex pests are medically expensive to maintain with their hormone blockaz and shieeet.
Women being in the military was a mistake, if there's almost always an inevitability that sexual misconduct involving them will occur. Give the homosexuals their army back. AIDS is preferably easier to treat compared to the logistical nightmare that is STDs and pregnancy. Sexual harassment wouldn't be a fucking thing because straight dudes always act gay with each other as a joke, even buttfucking and molesting each other for lols to an extent.
There is a reason why military women are notorious for promiscuity and infidelity.
Enjoy sloppy seconds from your barracks bunny. Delusional child.
Never be in a relationship when you're in the army. Save the melodramatics and accept the fact that you'll become worthless fodder for ZOG.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
You intentionally left out the second part where I acknowledged that:
Just because something is an awesome fantasy doesn't mean I think it'll happen.
Last edited:
Chainsaw Man
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2024
Only if there are women who can keep up with the male standard, otherwise we'll be putting them in situations that they can't handle. Most women won't be able to do this, but if they can pull it off I don't see why not.
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2021
Sargon's wife's son
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
Friend of mine was in the army who's this female colleague in the army really hot that woman suck more **** the Japanese **** star.
The jobs women can do in the army would be all real echelon jobs but probably not loading up the trucks cause women have less upper body strength they could also be bewick's prostitute
The jobs women can do in the army would be all real echelon jobs but probably not loading up the trucks cause women have less upper body strength they could also be bewick's prostitute
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2024
No. At first I was going to say "just not in combat roles." but them being in non combat roles is just as bad. Historically, armies have been only a top grade of men. Fit men with a good mentality who can mesh with others and follow orders without antisocial tendencies. This worked well with the rigorous and intense training designed to mold these men into perfect soldiers. Training devised from thousands of years of military tradition.
Ever want to see the most capable men in the world devolve into monkeys? Throw a woman in the mix. They will start competing, acting reckless, loathing their sexual competitors. This completely undoes all of their training, because there is no effective training to remove a young man's sex drive other than forced abstinence. Women completely change the dynamic of every organization, the men want to fuck her and the brass will go easy on her subconsciously. I don't care how tough you are, you have to be a psychopath to willingly exert 100% anger and physical abuse on a woman in the army, like when training or punishing her.
Women are also weaker, and respond to stress poorly. Most if not all react with "yell and run" when put into danger. Cue the videos of women cops freaking the hell out and scream crying when in danger. What soldier wants to bet his life on that and roll the dice when a woman comes to assist? Women aren't completely relied on in the military like men, they are allowed to join, but imagine the outrage if all women squads were sent into combat. Just doesn't happen. So why are we allowing them to act like they contribute when both they and the brass aren't really expecting responsibilities?
Rome fell when they relaxed their standards for army enlistment. They no longer required the top men in their empire, they allowed more of the idiots and lazies into the legion and paid the price. Many decisions America has made were mistakes, It sounds so backwards and retarded in this day and age, but giving women the vote was a mistake, we should have acknowledged the differences in our genders. Men are better at conceptualizing the problems of the outside world, looking for danger and protecting the house, the perfect traits for soldiers who want to protect. Women are caretakers who watch over the home and stay focused on family and home environment, with almost no ability to understand the cruelty of the outside world without panic. So why we let women vote or join the army is beyond me.
Ever want to see the most capable men in the world devolve into monkeys? Throw a woman in the mix. They will start competing, acting reckless, loathing their sexual competitors. This completely undoes all of their training, because there is no effective training to remove a young man's sex drive other than forced abstinence. Women completely change the dynamic of every organization, the men want to fuck her and the brass will go easy on her subconsciously. I don't care how tough you are, you have to be a psychopath to willingly exert 100% anger and physical abuse on a woman in the army, like when training or punishing her.
Women are also weaker, and respond to stress poorly. Most if not all react with "yell and run" when put into danger. Cue the videos of women cops freaking the hell out and scream crying when in danger. What soldier wants to bet his life on that and roll the dice when a woman comes to assist? Women aren't completely relied on in the military like men, they are allowed to join, but imagine the outrage if all women squads were sent into combat. Just doesn't happen. So why are we allowing them to act like they contribute when both they and the brass aren't really expecting responsibilities?
Rome fell when they relaxed their standards for army enlistment. They no longer required the top men in their empire, they allowed more of the idiots and lazies into the legion and paid the price. Many decisions America has made were mistakes, It sounds so backwards and retarded in this day and age, but giving women the vote was a mistake, we should have acknowledged the differences in our genders. Men are better at conceptualizing the problems of the outside world, looking for danger and protecting the house, the perfect traits for soldiers who want to protect. Women are caretakers who watch over the home and stay focused on family and home environment, with almost no ability to understand the cruelty of the outside world without panic. So why we let women vote or join the army is beyond me.
Last edited: