- Joined
- May 25, 2013
Chris is worse then Hitler!
Er, no insult to Hitler btw
Er, no insult to Hitler btw
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
James Ashbeck said:Dr. Cuddlebug said:Still like Chris?
Yes. This isn't evidence he's evil. It's just further evidence that he's an idiot. I already knew that.
Tubular Monkey said:Chris doesn't even have a personality. I don't mean he's boring, I mean he lacks a personality. What's to like?
Dr. Cuddlebug said:James Ashbeck said:Dr. Cuddlebug said:Still like Chris?
Yes. This isn't evidence he's evil. It's just further evidence that he's an idiot. I already knew that.
The guy makes fun of a massive tragedy where thousands of people died just because an imaginary troll egged him on to do it.
That's not just being a exceptional individual that's having a severe disdain for others, or at the very least lacking any empathy for other human beings.
James Ashbeck said:I don't think he'd have done it if he had a full understanding of the gravity of the situation. Considering Chris doesn't have a full understanding of the gravity of anything, it's not a difficult assumption to make.
Ian's murderous tendencies showed up again in Rescuing Kacey From Christian W Chandler. In the video, Chris manages to twist a game made for children of all ages into a tool to spread his hatred, as he breaks into Liquid's home and shoots him. Due to the limitations of the game, this is accomplished with a paint gun, but what happens next makes his true intent all too clear.
In a stunning display of unoriginality, Chris reused exactly the same plotline for Sonichu Special 4. In this comic, Chris depicts Liquid as a knife-wielding villain who kidnapped Kacey. Upon arriving to "rescue" her, Chris produces a handgun (possibly Decepticon leader Megatron in disguise), shoots Liquid in both his shins, and leaves him to bleed to death. When Kacey expressed horror at the fact that he wanted to kill her boyfriend, Chris missed the point about why she was so upset. He told her that he could re-draw the comic, and that such shots were meant to keep Liquid from chasing them, completely avoiding the issue that wanting to shoot someone or permanently cripple them is off-putting. Chris also tried to justify this with the fact that Comic-Liquid was coming at him with a knife, and didn't seem to comprehend the real source of Kacey's shock: she wasn't angry at Comic-Chris for defending himself (albeit in a cowardly way) as she was angry at Real-Chris for constructing a fantasy in which he could justify maiming and permanently crippling her boyfriend, and be completely in the right about it.
Dr. Cuddlebug said:[He's a 30 year old man-CHILD who went to college.
By your logic the guy's too stupid to be held accountable for his actions. The guy has threatened to kill people before, insulted people based on race and religion. He's not a good person by any standards.
Dr. Cuddlebug said:James Ashbeck said:I don't think he'd have done it if he had a full understanding of the gravity of the situation. Considering Chris doesn't have a full understanding of the gravity of anything, it's not a difficult assumption to make.
He's a 30 year old man who went to college.
By your logic the guy's too stupid to be held accountable for his actions. The guy has threatened to kill people before, insulted people based on race and religion. He's not a good person by any standards.
Then you're an idiot. And that's the nice way of saying that.James Ashbeck said:A-№1 said:Do you mean apart from running the same guy over with his car? Twice.
So you're saying that he intended to run Snyder over with his car? I highly doubt it.
Irrelevant. And a pathetic attempt to sidetrack the argument. What matters is he intended to run over Snyder right before he did.There's no way that he left the house with the intention of running the guy over in his car.
Chris would happily murder people if he thought he could get away with it. He has said so himself.A-№1 said:Chris is not mostly harmless through lack of intent, but through lack of ability.
It's funny that you use this phrasing, because it was precisely Christian's lack of ability that got him into that situation, and not his intent.
You seem to be implying that it's only his lack of ability that stops him from running over more people, which is ridiculous.
James Ashbeck said:Tubular Monkey said:Chris doesn't even have a personality. I don't mean he's boring, I mean he lacks a personality. What's to like?
This is the opposite of the truth! Chris has an incredibly strong and well defined personality. There's a 1000+ page wiki that is mostly devoted to describing the intricacies of his personality.
James Ashbeck said:Dr. Cuddlebug said:Still like Chris?
Yes. This isn't evidence he's evil. It's just further evidence that he's an idiot. I already knew that.
I was actually traveling through Pakistan on Sept. 11th 2001. I was in Lahore. While I'm sure most people out there didn't support terrorism, they did have a pretty dim view of America's foreign policy. Most people were pretty sedate as they sat watching CNN, but I remember one group of young kids. They must have been about 13, and they were clearly delighted about what happened.
Did I feel hate for them? No. I knew that if they had any concept of the reality of the situation, the staggering human suffering, the injustice, the tragedy, they wouldn't have smiles on their faces. But they were ignorant. They were in a bubble, created by their environment and their immaturity.
Just like Chris.
James Ashbeck said:I'm not saying that he shouldn't be held accountable for his actions. I'm saying there should be a bit of balance. He's nowhere near as detestable as he is perceived by many on this forum. I also think the actions of some of the people who trolled him are worse than any action that he has ever done to anyone, that I am aware of.
A-№1 said:Then you're an idiot. And that's the nice way of saying that.
A-№1 said:I'm sensing a locked thread and bann happening again in the very near future.
Haha jeez. Way to completely dodge responding to any points.James Ashbeck said:Haha jeez. I'd hate to hear the nasty way. I dunno why you can't converse like an adult without resorting to childish name calling.
Wait and see…A-№1 said:I'm sensing a locked thread and bann happening again in the very near future.
I haven't broken any rules. I think it would be pretty ridiculous for me to get banned and the thread to get locked just because I've expressed an opinion that differs from consensus here. Hopefully the manajerks here take a more measured and mature attitude to conflicting opinions than you do.
Dr. Cuddlebug said:Because making fun of an idiot on the internet is worse than threatening to brutally murder someone