Dr. Disrespect permanently banned from Twitch - Turns out he was a groomer

[ddlloo]

His statement is obviously written by a lawyer due to his obligations from Twitch settlement

I somehow doubt saying "I have never sexted or tried to meet up with an underage girl" would breach the terms.

 

[74164978231]

Sounding like twitch wanted to get rid of Dr and found some morally ambiguous(the guy had already cheated on his wife so pretty good chance he was having inappropriate convos/interactions for a married dude) thing he was doing and twitch assumed it was solid enough reason to end his contract.

 

[Kirtto]

I somehow doubt saying "I have never sexted or tried to meet up with an underage girl" would breach the terms.

It can. Certain NDAs prohibit you from even mentioned or making references to certain events, saying that an event did or didn't happen would fall under this. As such he can't acknowledge the event he is being accused of and has to use vague language. There is some comments on YouTube also talking about their experiences with NDAs which I found interesting:

 

[marvlouslie]

It's only 99.95% when they are a minecraft content creator. Around a 75-79% chance for any other kind.

Either Minecraft or Roblox. Those creators have a typical 80% chance of being a nonce.

 

[marvlouslie]

If this was true he’d be papped off of YouTube by now too.

The fact that this is coming from a FORMER Twitch employee (who are well known paypigs for ethots on the platform who've gotten away with and done more heinous shit), is incredibly sus as fuck, given their track record for "crying wolf" and it turning out to be largely bullshit.

 

[whatever I feel like]

The fact that this is coming from a FORMER Twitch employee (who are well known paypigs for ethots on the platform who've gotten away with and done more heinous shit), is incredibly sus as fuck, given their track record for "crying wolf" and it turning out to be largely bullshit.

Yeah, shame HE ALL BUT CONFIRMED IT when asked, though.

Edit: Ehh, I see the second response now. I dunno, seems suss but I guess he's back into the basket of "I don't care" for now.

 

[marvlouslie]

Yeah, shame HE ALL BUT CONFIRMED IT when asked, though.

Edit: Ehh, I see the second response now. I dunno, seems suss but I guess he's back into the basket of "I don't care" for now.

If you have proof of allegations like this, you do NOT sit on this for 4 years, and you most definitely do not announce this shit on Twitter.

 

[Gondolindrim]

I'm looking into the sources of the allegations and they do not hold water. The big video being cited is some cuck whose admitting he has a bad memory saying that some guy told him Doc was messaging minors in Rust, which is literally playground gossip. The guy who broke the story is tweeting insane stuff like this

And updating his bio with "I'm getting sued." Either he's not taking any of this seriously or he's having a mental breakdown.

Another thing I'm seeing a lot of is talk about Non-disclosure agreements and how that's how this story could've stayed under wraps for 4 years. Now, I've signed a few NDAs in my life but I'm not a lawyer and don't know the inner workings of the system. But what I do know is that texting minors is a crime, and a streaming company doesn't get to give you an NDA that absolves you of wrongdoing as long as you play ball. NDAs break the microsecond something illegal happens. A disturbing amount of people don't know how they actually work.

 

[Kheapathic]

The big video being cited is some cuck whose admitting he has a bad memory saying that some guy told him Doc was messaging minors in Rust, which is literally playground gossip.

What an interesting excuse to have. You know who else had a bad memory (due to head trauma), the guy who was ProJared's accuser. I'm not gonna take a bullet for or defend Jared, but the dude was pretty adamant about what he was doing and under the progressive guise of consent. It was the one person going buck wild, who then came out and talked about taking blows to the head and forgetting simple shit, while maintaining he had perfect memory of all the weird shit going on with Jared. Him not remembering what he heard from someone else should be immediately disregarded. I also try to maintain that I have zero trust in anything anyone ever associated with Twitch (or other big kahntent creators) say; as much as they may claim otherwise, they're all drama llamas and clout goblins, because any attention is good attention. I still remember when Slasher did his "I KNOW WHY" stream, where you had a number of big name Twitch people show up and just talk about nothing. Also, it's Twitch, anyone who plays the game will immediately stab others in the back.

You either give me a court case, provable text logs, or something; because I see all those people as scorpions asking to cross the river.

If Doc wanted to disrespect his wife more and fuck kids, by all means, give him a piece of glass to the abdominal aorta; but if it's just a bunch of e-celebs saying of course they knew... I'd rather listen to paint dry.

But if Twitch employees were unscrupulously reading Whisper DMs of their top creators and that creator was shady AF instead of illegal? Unclean hands are everywhere. Which is exactly why this makes sense to me.

I'm not arguing in defense of reading texts here, just giving some hand-washing. When you own and control a platform as Twitch does, it goes without saying that you have certain levels of control and should explain that privacy does not exist and your communications risk being examined. Whether they want to say they were using an automated detector, auditing, or whatever; they can practically make up a BS excuse and explain away why they're rifling through people's messages.

Do I think they were doing that, oh fuck no, their staff were/are all fucking creepers and weirdos.

Unless something hard comes out; on the boat that he was being courted by others (Ninja had recently jumped to Mixer) and instead of paying him more to stay, just gave him an early release and ate the cost. What you do as a performer is play it up, to get eyes and attention on you.

 

[DrearyDoomguy]

It can. Certain NDAs prohibit you from even mentioned or making references to certain events, saying that an event did or didn't happen would fall under this. As such he can't acknowledge the event he is being accused of and has to use vague language. There is some comments on YouTube also talking about their experiences with NDAs which I found interesting:

This more or less lines up with the gut feeling I had about this. Once lawyers get involved everything turns into an absolute clusterfuck where you have to watch every word you say, and even things as basic as denying specific allegations might be a no-no due to some weird legal restrictions.
I just don't buy it that Twitch would be afraid of fighting him on his contract money if he did what he was accused of. The worst that could be inferred was that they read private messages, as if a big tech service failing to respect their users' privacy is anything new. Paying a guy who creeped on a minor would be more damaging.

 

[Kheapathic]

Apparently Doc co-founded a game studio; and they have since parted ways with each other.

Tweet: https://x.com/12am/status/1805341504086622355
Archive: https://archive.is/60WIX


Still iffy, because "speaking to parties involved" is nebulous; where if Doc is under a NDA, he can't say a whole lot, while everyone else can just say whatever they want, evidence be damned.

 

[DrearyDoomguy]

Still iffy, because "speaking to parties involved" is nebulous; where if Doc is under a NDA, he can't say a whole lot, while everyone else can just say whatever they want, evidence be damned.

I can't even understand what they're trying to say. Are they saying they terminated their relationship with him at the same time they began speaking to parties involved? Because it sure sounds like it from the wording of the tweet. And what is "these facts" even referring to? The facts uncovered by speaking to the parties involved? This post is so vague and evasive that I'm inclined to think they're just throwing him under the bus.

 

[Kheapathic]

I can't even understand what they're trying to say. Are they saying they terminated their relationship with him at the same time they began speaking to parties involved? Because it sure sounds like it from the wording of the tweet. And what is "these facts" even referring to? The facts uncovered by speaking to the parties involved? This post is so vague and evasive that I'm inclined to think they're just throwing him under the bus.

I started by asking who are the "parties involved." Doc's behind an NDA, and after watching Sean/Potentially Criminal talk to some girl, you're very restricted about what you can say. So they if they talked to Doc, they probably got the same "We found no wrong doing, they paid out" answer. So who else did they talk to, some weird dude who was trying to get seats filled for his band? Twitch Legal? Former Twitch Head Mod Hassan? The underage person in question? Rob "Slasher" Bitchslaw? Most likely they talked to vindictive clout goblins, and so the facts are "trust me bro."

 

[mikebrown]

Can't wait for this to be like the posthumous-twomad situation again and have it all come out as a nothingburger/sour grapes in about a month once the chronically online twittertards stop caring.

 

[throwaway2024]

Can't wait for this to be like the posthumous-twomad situation again and have it all come out as a nothingburger/sour grapes in about a month once the chronically online twittertards stop caring.

If the doc is truly innocent, I hope he doesn't end up like twomad

 

[Terrifik]

what are the bets on Quarter Pounder Right doc will be released or are we playing with the meme NDA is if we feel like it?

 

[ddlloo]

Apparently cut his stream short and announced he was weary and was going to take a hiatus.

 

[Kirtto]

what are the bets on Quarter Pounder Right doc will be released or are we playing with the meme NDA is if we feel like it?

XQC also said a doc would be released but I don't know if in support of Doc or of the allegations

 

[HarrySachz]

Doctor Disrespect announces an indefinite hiatus after the allegations of sexting a minor and getting Banned on Twitch because of that . He basically looked at his cellphone and slowly broke apart:

I just wanted to play the game and have a good time, dog sniffers.

It happened around the 3:11 hour mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E73nGJocgAA&t=71s

 

[shekelshoah666]

I'm looking into the sources of the allegations and they do not hold water. The big video being cited is some cuck whose admitting he has a bad memory saying that some guy told him Doc was messaging minors in Rust, which is literally playground gossip. The guy who broke the story is tweeting insane stuff like this
View attachment 6118540
And updating his bio with "I'm getting sued." Either he's not taking any of this seriously or he's having a mental breakdown.

Another thing I'm seeing a lot of is talk about Non-disclosure agreements and how that's how this story could've stayed under wraps for 4 years. Now, I've signed a few NDAs in my life but I'm not a lawyer and don't know the inner workings of the system. But what I do know is that texting minors is a crime, and a streaming company doesn't get to give you an NDA that absolves you of wrongdoing as long as you play ball. NDAs break the microsecond something illegal happens. A disturbing amount of people don't know how they actually work.

Very hard to take this dude seriously when he has been constantly baiting this shit. Maybe at his next show he will finally let us know.