Orbiter "Dr" Karlyn Borysenko - Libertarian party candidate for governor of NH, grifter, turbo Karen, sexual harasser, “Everyone who died in the holocaust chose to die in the holocaust…that’s why Hitler went to Heaven”

[Sammich]

You know, I didn't say that did I? I wasn't even the one who said, "Oh shit Ralph is gonna be the biggest enemy she ever made..."

I said that she messed with someone who seems as crazy as she is and... he DID have more viewers by far than she did tonight.

Are we in a fight or something? They are both lolcows, right?

They came in hot as hell at you for some reason. Ralph had 600ish viewers last i checked, karlyn rarely gets over 125. I swear if i didn't know better I'd think he was the rare fan of hers.

 

[Greyrock]

They came in hot as hell at you for some reason.

@Um... Are you hot for Karlyn or something? She'd be happy to dominate you in bed, beat you 'till you cry and shove a horsewhip up your ass while telling you that you are too low IQ for her, that there's no such thing as being racist against whites, it's all about capitalism, she's the most talented and beautiful journalist ever, that everyone else is a grifter... You can find her in Merrimack if you are interested. Knock on the door, she'll answer. She'll ask you to just do some heavy housework and ask you to step around Viktor while he's gaming. She might feed you some leftover turkey that was drenched in molasses. Pet her dogs and step around the shit on the floor.... eventually you'll get around to the real joy of having her tie you to a chair and scream about KERISMITH! KERISMITH! KERISMITH!

 

[Greyrock]

AHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA. James Lindsay finally blocked her. Now she's having her people bother him about it and claiming that he blocked her because he is getting paid by Moms4Liberty. She's also saying that she's far better at teaching than he is...in her new twitter banner.



Lindsay should have blocked this psycho a long time ago.

In the past couple of weeks she has attacked the two people that she had in her twitter banner. Because she can't help herself.

 

[Sammich]

More links to the knitting and fiber arts community drama would be good. There are some threads, I'll see what I can find if you don't beat me to it.

I've been following Karlyn for a long time. I'm not sure she's a lolcow, but she probably counts as an e celeb, and there's a lot of discussion to be had; she's absolutely eccentric and gets into sone funny situations.

That's really the only thing missing!

 

[Greyrock]

Here's Karlyn saying she knew James would eventually block her. Her cope over this has been impressive. You can tell she was bothered by it, but almost immediately decided that James did it because he secretly knows she's smarter and better in every way than he is. Do you think she really believes this? She knew it would happen "sooner or later" because she's an insufferable reply guy who tries to poke at and one-up people. Lindsay put out a tweet saying, "For some reason I'm getting a lot of comments claiming that I'm paid by Moms4Liberty..." That was Karlyn's doing. Her people have been harassing James for a couple of days now.


Karlyn's at a low in popularity, but this is all the shit she did when she had tens of thousands of dedicated followers who did not yet know that she was a lying lolcow. It's just these few dedicated cult followers any more, but she still manages to get them to harass whomever she chooses, while she sits in a diaper full of delusion.

 

[Palla Strozzi]

Lindsay put out a tweet saying, "For some reason I'm getting a lot of comments claiming that I'm paid by Moms4Liberty..." That was Karlyn's doing.

For posterity:
(link, archive)

BrainstemsGhost@BrainstemsGhost
Dec 5 Dec 5, 2023 · 11:35 PM UTC
Replying to @ConceptualJames
it's coming from that fat cow @drkarlynb, because she's pissed off you won't use her work and cut ties with @Moms4Liberty. Remember, she thought you'd sleep with her. She spent a solid half hour trashing you today

James Lindsay, against magic@ConceptualJames
Dec 5 Dec 5, 2023 · 11:50 PM UTC
Replying to @BrainstemsGhost @DrKarlynB @Moms4Liberty
Oh. She's been sniping at me for weeks. I got sick of it.

Whomp whomp.

 

[ASeabear8952]

I looked at that BrainstemsGhost account to see if it was related to the original Brainstem account.

Don’t know if it’s affiliated with it or not but it’s relatively new and is a Karlyn detractor.

https://x.com/brainstemsghost?s=21&t=W9GjgDSkxnlGne0WMsCA1Q

 

[Greyrock]

What's new.

https://nickandi.substack.com/p/ethan-ralph-versus-me

She wrote a substack about Ethan Ralph, but if you notice she used quite a bit of it to attack Mike Harlow.

She's trying to get Nick Fuentes reinstated on X.



She did another attack on Dave Rubin that appears to claim that he stole her content about the socialists. Basically, if you talk about socialists at all, you are stealing her content.

Her twitter banner is now just her saying she's better than James Lindsay.

 

[ASeabear8952]

What's new.

https://nickandi.substack.com/p/ethan-ralph-versus-me

She wrote a substack about Ethan Ralph, but if you notice she used quite a bit of it to attack Mike Harlow.

Quoted for posterity:

Ethan Ralph Versus Me?​

Should I be afraid of this?​

KARLYN BORYSENKO
DEC 9, 2023



Want to know what this is? Start here.

Subscribe

---

Here’s your soundtrack:
I had a really busy week this week infiltrating a Sex Ed Conference that kept trying to ban me (completely unsuccessfully, of course) because they know I’m going to show people what they talk about when they think we aren’t listening.
I’ll be releasing clips and news from that on my main Substack over the next week…but I bring that up here because while I was doing my final prep for it, I noticed a few anonymous rage addicted in my replies complaining about Ethan Ralph.
That’s odd…I don’t normally get retards in my feed.
I was confused until I realized that Ethan Ralph had posted about me in his telegram group, apparently with his delicate panties in a twist over the essay I wrote on here about his campaign against Nick Fuentes.


And, of course, he did precisely what I would expect a low-IQ, trash creator to do, which is to pick up a two-year-old smear campaign that I’ve already more than outlived and addressed.
They keep bringing it up because it’s all they have against me.
That 20 years ago, I met and dated someone in college who went to prison for a crime I know he didn’t commit, and stood by him.
I’m supposed to be ashamed of that? That I was loyal to someone who was wronged through the darkest days of their life?
Nah, bro. I’m good with my choices.
This was a smear campaign run by Brandon Straka’s best friend from the #WalkAway campaign, a self-hating queer named Mike Harlow who spends his time trying to get straight men to sleep with him.
This is me and him in the front row of a Trump rally in Georgia in 2020.


He used to text me his conquests from conservative men he picked up at #WalkAway events.


Anyway, I just think it’s funny that this is Ethan Ralph’s source of information, considering one of his main arguments against Nick is that he’s gay.
But, Ethan had some feelings to work out on the internet and so he did the most predictable thing and streamed about me.


He started this stream while I was already live on my channel and I warned my mods that he might have some guests today and to just block them if they start causing trouble.
But I wasn’t worried.
The thing about smear campaigns is that, if you survive them, they lose their effectiveness at some point.
I had never hidden that I had a friend who went to prison for a crime he didn’t commit. My family all knew about it. My friends all knew about it. Even my supporter community knew about it because it had come up in casual conversation.
And two years ago when all the bullshit started, the internet learned about it.
Many of them didn't bother to look into the truth, and didn’t care…but I also made some great friends with the people who took the time to reach out and ask what happened.
The ones who use it as ammunition are almost universally horrible people who don’t care what the truth is, so why would it matter to me what they think?
Turns out that having a smear campaign about you is actually a pretty great filtering mechanism for people to include in your life.
No matter how bad it got, I was always proud of myself for facing that mob and saying “No, I will not bend the knee to your bullshit, I know what happened because I was there, you can all go fuck yourselves if you want me to be disloyal to my friend.”
Every once in a while, it comes up…and I roll my eyes and block a bunch of people, and life goes on.
It has no impact on my work, it has no impact on my finances, it has no impact on my community.
The children REEEEEEEE into the ether because literally no one cares.
But this time, it was interesting.
This time, I had a creator known for creating annoying mobs of rage-addicted losers to attack his enemies…and I didn’t hear anything.
Nothing.
Not a single peep.


I couldn’t help but think that I either had a really good block list, or Ethan just didn’t have much of an audience to weaponize anymore.
I later looked at his stream and it seems he only had like 300 people watching.
Didn’t he used to have thousands of people watching him?
How sad.
So, what you’re telling me is that Ethan Ralph made it his mission to destroy Nick Fuentes…and he actually ended up destroying himself?
How delicious.

 

[Palla Strozzi]

I found this pretty funny, from her replies:
(archive)

@BeReasonable01
15h
Replying to @DrKarlynB
Are you ok? 33 years a therapist here.
Dec 9, 2023 · 8:29 AM UTC

I'm a lifelong tomboy-type who only ever wears makeup to very special occasions, and even I can see that this is VERY poorly-applied foundation. (And Karlyn, it's "chapped" - you're supposed to be smarter than James Lindsay, remember? lol).
She's also going after Billboard Chris again, but really just trying half-arsedly to insert herself into a minor back-and-forth between him and Buck Angel; nothing too interesting (link 1, archive 1; link 2, archive 2). (Billboard Chris and Buck Angel are, of course, not at all on the same "side").

 

[FuckMeGentlyWithAChainsaw]

There's something really off with those eyes...

 

[Cringestorian X]

update from the ralphamale sides

archive
took this from twitter so apologize for the quality

edit : oh i see she's already wrote a substack article about it, why you couldn't just answer the question when you're in the twitter space karlyn ? too afraid to talk to ralph ? that's fucking sad lol

 

[Greyrock]

https://twitter.com/DrKarlynB/status/1734246479454261590

This is her "go to" rant about low IQ in response to Ethan Ralph attacking her.



Do you think she's looking for advice?

In that Ralph clip where he taunts her asking if she's going to cry and quit again she says, "I...I...I.... I was actually talked back into staying." She was never going to quit.

He's streaming about her right now.



I have to love that he paused her stream in a spot where she looks completely nuts.

 

[ASeabear8952]

https://twitter.com/DrKarlynB/status/1734246479454261590

Archived.

 

[Sammich]

Archived.
View attachment 5558865

It's always so revealing the types that talk about IQ so often, I don't think she is as dumb as she comes across, but all that "we are smarter than you, I only have smart followers" shit is doing her no favors whatsoever.

 

[Greyrock]

I don't think she is as dumb as she comes across

I do. She's positively stupid. She reduces everything down to simplistic terms because that's the only thing that she can understand. She's often wrong, too. But confidently incorrect.





This bitch is over 40. It's her inaction for decades, too. She discovered this problem literally last year.



I'm sure she could scrape some up off the floor under her toilet.

https://twitter.com/DrKarlynB/status/1734474360352657700

Another attack on Keri Smith, who has not talked about Karlyn in many many months. Maybe close to a year. Remember, Keri is obsessed with Karlyn.



Karlyn learned to have sex with AI.



It's the life she created. It's the one she wants.

 

[Greyrock]

Today's update seriously just end me she's so annoying.

https://twitter.com/SenecaSpeaks21/status/1735041422259314956

For some reason she decided to come on this dude's post an insult him. She's just being a complete twat.



He supporters are as hopelessly stupid as she is. She's saying that she had a burner account "compromised", but she will just make another "cry harder bitches". So some of the folks she stalks figured out which account needed blocking and blocked it. Her follower says, "They can't quit you." Bitch. They are TRYING to quit her. They are trying to block her. She replied, "'Still as obsessed with me as they have been for over two years." You dumb bitch. If you are stalking people from burners, THEY are not the ones obsessed.

https://twitter.com/DrKarlynB/status/1735107576465870923

She asked a question and has spent two hours barking "no" at people and being insufferable. Two hours. Just being bitchy at people.



The question she asked is complex. It does not just boil down only two "the left thinks the nuclear family upholds capitalism". That is the answer she wants because her brain can't grasp the larger picture and won't even entertain it, further she demands that everyone answer only the way she wants. She doesn't want people thinking beyond her rote cult rules about how socialism works.



Shoot me in the face if I'm ever thinking of trying to simp for some bitch like this.



Karlyn knows that Nick Fuentes wants to execute non-Christians, but it doesn't bother her.

 

[Palla Strozzi]

Only just noticed that we made it to 50 pages guys! well done

---

I'm not as eloquent a narrator of her madness as Greyrock is, but I just have to post this - she gets massively owned by someone who actually knows what he's talking about (i.e., actually understands the left):
(archive)

Herbert MarcUSA @LoganLancing
Dec 16
Was putting the kids down and came back to a psychotic break, lol.
I don't know what to say. You're just wrong. The people in the 2 videos I just watched that you shared are 100% in line with what I'm saying.
The line from Harris that gives the game away is, ""To the extent that white workers identify with "whiteness," "a central component of Anglo-American bourgeois consciousness...," and not with their proletarian status as workers, they will remain supporters and defenders of relative privileges for whites as extended by capital."
So, yes, CRT wants to end capitalism. Duh. But "whiteness" doesn't equal "capitalism." Whiteness is a socio-cultural bourgeois private property that must be abolished so that white workers can begin to identify with their "proletarian status as workers" --which they aren't currently doing, apparently, because their "whiteness as property" affords them privilege. Only then can they join everyone else in solidarity to agitate and abolish *private property* as human self-estrangement."
Like, this is precisely what the activists say. Why do you think the activists have been doing everything they can to demonize white people for years? To work towards abolishing *whiteness* so those white people can then be "freed" to join in solidarity on the march to abolishing capitalism. Clear as day. Anyway, lol

(archive)

Herbert MarcUSA @LoganLancing
Dec 16
I'll bite!
This unambiguously disproves your thesis. First, she doesn't say "whiteness." Second, she is saying what I've been saying, which is that "whiteness" (that's what she's getting at with the "white people" lines) affords white people privilege while alleviating them from guilt. So, abolish "whiteness as socio-cultural bourgeoisie private property" so white people can then be freed to join in solidarity towards dismantling "capitalism" through the abolition of private property.
Clear as day

He is, of course, correct - her "decoding" basically equates to "socialists hate capitalism," which is like saying "the right is conservative" - this is obvious to everyone. I really do get concerned about the mental capacity of the troglodytes who follow her faithfully - they are clearly so extremely dumb that they can be manipulated into anything, and she is dangerous at the head of a group of people like this.
Of course, she directs these idiots to harass him:

(archive)
He must have blocked her by this point, but if memory serves, she was quote-tweeting the Marcuse account.
And I have no idea who this person is, but the whole thing is *chef's kiss* classic Karlyn:
(archive)
Image:

This is what she was quote-tweeting, and the DMs he posted:

---

On another note, I noticed recently that the most-viewed video on her YouTube channel, by quite a bit (almost 80,000 more views than the second most popular), is one of her interviews with Keri Smith, which is hilarious and must piss her off no end:

 

[Greyrock]

That feud with Logan Lancing has gone on for days now. What else is she up to?



The groypers apparently cornered and harassed gay Republican Rob Smith. She's sticking up for the groypers, calling Smith a traitor and repeatedly talking about how "words are not violence". Which, you will recall...flies out the window the moment she feels like she is getting attacked too much online.

https://nickandi.substack.com/p/loyalty

She wrote about "loyalty". It's yet another opportunity for her to defend the pedo ex boyfriend. In this article she talks about how her flirtation with him was never serious, it was just something done to annoy their parents. But also, she really thinks he was crushed when she married Victor instead. Basically every time she writes or talks about this she throws something out there that contradicts something she has said previously. On the one hand, she has mentioned that she tried to tell him that his business partners were shifty and were going to get him in trouble, but on the other hand he never knew a single thing about any of the child porn he was running the payment system for and he was set up by the government. Anyone can contemplate how the government might set up someone like Brandon Straka or Donald Trump... but for the life of me, I can't think of a single reason why the government would bother to "set up" some rando dude running a payment system for kiddie porn.



Screencapping a tweet to attack Deb Fillman's looks again.



Posting AI pics of herself.



She always knows when people are lying to her because she's very intuitive.

 

[ASeabear8952]

https://nickandi.substack.com/p/loyalty

Quoted for posterity.

Loyalty​

A virtue​

KARLYN BORYSENKO
DEC 16, 2023
3
1



Want to know what this is? Start here.

Subscribe

---

There’s a six and a half hour videodocumenting the drama of Cozy following revelations of Ali Alexander doing scandalous things with boys under 18, leading up to Ethan Ralph being kicked off the platform.
I’m not going to go into the content of it, you can watch for yourself and decide what you think.
In the video, there’s a section where Nick is talking to Big Tech about loyalty:
I’ve thought a lot about loyalty over the past few years.
You can never understand what it means to be loyal to someone until it costs you something to do so, and you never know if you’ll do it until you’re tested.
I thought my test came when a man I dated 20 years ago in college, someone who I genuinely considered to be one of the loves of my life, went to prison for 8.5 years for a crime he didn’t commit.
I knew he didn’t commit it. Everyone in my life knew he didn’t. Everyone in his life knew he didn’t.
Even the government that railroaded him to plead guilty to things he didn’t do until the threat of spending the rest of his life in prison at 24-years-old…even they knew he didn’t do it. My friend was originally going to go to trial to prove his innocence. He wanted to fight. And when he did that, the government moved the venue to an extremely unfavorable area so that the jury pool was such that there was an 80% chance of conviction.
They knew they couldn’t get him with a jury pool that understood how the internet worked (this was a long time ago, remember), so they changed the venue to change the jury pool.
My friend once told me he signed his soul onto that piece of paper when he lied to take the guilty plea.
I thought that was the test of my loyalty. Would I stick by someone that I absolutely knew was innocent in the face of this?
It’s so easy to turn your back on someone in prison, to write them off, to forget they even exist.
But I didn’t. I stood by him. And I have no regrets about that.
I stood by him when he got out.
And then, maybe six months to a year after that happened, we got into a massive fight. I think that was in 2015. I don’t think he ever really forgave me for getting married while he was in prison. But the reality was (contrary to any rumors on the internet), we weren’t in a relationship when he was in prison. It was all just messing around to trigger our families.
Anyway, we didn’t speak much after that fight. I didn’t trust him anymore, and he knew it.
Every once in a while, we would share a text message or a DM (“hey, how are you” sort of stuff), and we went out for drinks when I went to NYC in 2020 before the world shut down, but that was really it.
I bring this all up because, ironically, the real test of my loyalty came years later, in 2022, when a narcissist who’s obsessed with me went through 15 years of my social media history to unearth something he could smear me with to try to destroy me.
And he dragged my friend - a private person, someone I had barely spoken to in 7 years - through the mud to get to me.
I wasn’t involved in anything my friend was doing that landed him in the hot water he did. We weren’t even in the same state - I was in Vermont, and he was bouncing back and forth between Boston and Sweden, where he was living with his girlfriend.
But, of course, on the internet, that doesn’t matter.
When the smear campaign started, my friend messaged me and said, “You didn’t do anything wrong.”
I told him I would never turn my back on him.
That was the last time we spoke.
This was the real test of whether or not I was willing to sacrifice to be loyal to someone who I knew had been wronged.
Again, this is someone I’ve barely spoken to in years. We both moved on with our lives. It would have been so easy for me to tell some tale about being lied to or deceived, he’s obviously guilty, I denounced him, burn the witch, blah blah blah…
It never even crossed my mind as a possibility.
You assholes think I’m going to stick by someone for 8.5 years in prison and then throw all that away because you’re crying on the internet about something you know nothing about?
Oh, the documents say he did it? Do you understand that pleading guilty to a crime you didn’t commit necessitates lying?
You complain all day about the government, and feds and this and that…but THIS TIME, the government’s telling the truth? Does that make any sense at all?
The truth is the internet doesn’t care if it’s true or not.
The point is to get you to break.
I didn’t fucking break. And I came out stronger for it on the other side. If anything, it made me more determined to tell these ridiculous people to fuck off and crave my own path.
So I passed the test. Here’s what I learned:
You do not know if you will pass that test until you face it.
It’s not something you can prepare for.
It’s a character trait, and the only way to find out if you have it is to be pushed to the limit without breaking.

You are either loyal, or you’re not.​

The drama stemming from Nick’s orbit is…well… ridiculous.
It’s overwhelmingly ridiculous.
Grown men so deprived of pussy that they turned into an entity worse than any mean girls you ever encountered in high school.
I think that Nick has the right idea when it comes to loyalty.
The problem is that there is no incentive on the internet to be loyal to anyone.
It’s either a character trait that you have or you don’t.
And if someone is willing to be disloyal to one person (without cause, of course), they will be disloyal to you.
Nick has planted himself in shark-infested waters, except the sharks circling him are people whose entire character is telling them to eat him alive.
The only incentive they have to be loyal to Nick is that they believe that doing so will benefit them in some way.
As soon as that perception changes - they won’t believe they can ride Nick’s coattails any longer to wherever they want to go - it will be like smelling blood in the water.
The bar for assessing whether or not someone has been disloyal should be high. It’s not something you just throw around at anyone who says something you don’t like.
In the example above, the larger conversation was about if Big Tech had been disloyal to Nick for publicly admonishing him over his relationship with Ali Alexander and Milo.
I don’t believe Big Tech was disloyal to Nick.
He was imperfectly loyal.
He was loyal in a way that Nick didn’t appreciate.
It was done with positive intent but perhaps could have been done differently.
He’s entitled to that prerogative, but what Big Tech did was a misdemeanor, not a high crime.
I also think he was testing Nick to see how he would react.
That might be inconvenient for Nick, but that’s not disloyalty.
Disloyalty is a high crime, something that is truly undeniable.
But once it happens, I think disloyalty should be punished with unrelenting fire.
Not only should it be fiercely fought, there should be retribution. That retribution must be undeniable.
Disloyalty is never forgotten.
Maybe you smooth things over at some point if it’s beneficial to do so, fine. Use them for what you can.
But never let your guard down.
If someone fucks you over once, they will fuck you over again, no matter how many sweet nothings they whisper in your ear.

Loyalty is a character trait.​

It is innate.
It’s built-in.
I think the great challenge Nick will face is that loyalty is not incentivized in the game he’s playing.
That’s why he has so many knife-shaped wombs in his back.
The game he’s playing is built on people of low character, and the more disloyal they are, the more money they make.
In an arena where people benefit from low-IQ bullshit, those who insist on offering loyalty to others only ask to be destroyed.
Believing that people in the game will be loyal when they have proven no capacity to do so is a mistake.
It’s like adopting a wild animal and believing that giving it love and food means it won’t eat you someday.


Of course, it’s going to eat you.
It gains more from eating you than it gains from your love.
Sometimes, it’s better to be a loner. You don’t have to spend as much time looking over your shoulder.