Skitzocow Dr. Matthew Harris / Matthew C. Harris - love child of Terry A. Davis and Francis E. Dec, sick skitzophenic, really loves saying the n-word, /pol/fessor of UCLA

But what I want to know is when it actually started. He clearly had problems before then, from what the students are saying, so at least a year longer than they will be willing to admit. But I want to know how long he was suffering delusions, being threatening towards blonde women, showing a severe disturbance in his mental faculties, but it was excused due to being the black man in the philosophy department. It's easy to say he was like this the whole time, but I doubt that. But I do think he lost contact with reality some time ago but wokeness kept UCLA from doing anything about it, and it would be very interesting, if difficult, to try and pinpoint just how long they let the writer of this manifesto, with all these thoughts bouncing around his head, stay a part of the university.

He hadn't talked to his mother for five years, and she didn't read the emails he sent her until she was told there were likely violent threats in there - is that a potential line to work from? Before he finished his PhD? After, when he saw what little reward that gave him? Before he started stalking - or was that a baseline level of crazy he always was and he only became manifesto-crazy after?

Basically, as has been pointed out, 800 pages doesn't appear overnight, even on a manic spree. So I'm treating it as a rule of thumb that the longer his craziness was allowed to go unchecked, the more of his opinions in his manifesto were considered acceptable for him to have while he was lecturing at UCLA. Either that, or they were too afraid to do anything about him because of how it would look, which is about as bad.
From the timeline posted earlier in the thread, it appears he was already having problems when he was a grad student at Duke: he was placed on academic probation and there were complaints lodged against him from his colleagues and students.

Those of us who have been through college and graduate school know that many of our cohort struggle with mental illness, as mental illness often manifests itself in the late teens and early twenties. I went to grad school with a lot of serious alcoholics and drug users, who would come to class or work looking rough but would manage to make it through the program with good-intentioned help from professors and department leaders, who recognized that these people were gifted despite their mental health struggles. Plus, mental health resources for graduate students are slim, as most of those resources are focused on underclassmen. But I am honestly astonished that he managed to pull himself together enough to complete a dissertation, defend it successfully, and graduate. He could have been really good at hiding the severity of his mental illness, or his dissertation committee and advisors knew he was struggling but helped him through because they did want to see him succeed. Quotas and diversity do have a role here, I think, but underneath the lunacy seen in this manifesto is a strong intellect that occasionally peeks through. Had he not been a schizo, he could have been a bright scholar, and I can see why he was accepted at Duke.

However, I think Duke does hold some responsibility here, particularly if they knew he had developed unhealthy fixations with colleagues or had unhealthy boundaries with students. But, in my experience, department leaders are hesitant to confront students directly about this stuff. They take it for granted that the wheat will separate from the chaff and that the students who are unworthy simply won’t complete the dissertation process. I can also say that the profession of teaching in higher ed, day-to-day, is pretty independent. Syllabi must be approved, and the department chair and dean are ostensibly in charge of the teaching staff, but the daily acts of teaching and classroom management are left up to the professors themselves with very little oversight from administrators. That’s what academic freedom means, and what separates higher ed instruction from secondary. But the danger in this is that situations like this can go unnoticed until it is too late, and Title IX investigations are usually more concerned with keeping the college out of controversy than actually helping students who have been violated.

I think, right now, it’s easy to take an example like this and use it to denigrate the entire university system. And while there are a fair number of professors in the university system who have deeply unprofessional practices and even beliefs, the vast majority of teachers and professors are just trying to do their jobs and earn their shekels in a shitty, thankless system that ensures they are overworked and underpaid.

Lastly, to be honest, and as many posters have already pointed out, there isn’t a huge difference in what Harris discusses here and the beliefs espoused by black nationalists such as the Nation of Islam, hoteps like Tariq Nasheed, and black political extremism. His writings are often hilarious, of course, and also extremely based at times, but part of me wonders if the real controversy here lies in the fact that he’s saying the quiet parts out loud.
 
A certain Gavin is mentioned 20-some times, presumably Prof. Gavin Lawrence at UCLA. It's definitely not because he likes the guy.
1644081676580.png

1644081699654.png

1644081716555.png

1644081751134.png

1644081769530.png

1644081826823.png

A threat, it seems
1644081877859.png

1644081927999.png
 
A certain Gavin is mentioned 20-some times, presumably Prof. Gavin Lawrence at UCLA. It's definitely not because he likes the guy.
Gavin Lawrence gave him repeated warnings for his misconduct.

I realize now this dude's sexual history consists of radical feminist SJWs. Every girl he's ever fucked didn't shave their armpits. Sarah, Ava.

Reminder this dude tried to trespass and the IT team did not remember to delete his emails.
 
A certain Gavin is mentioned 20-some times, presumably Prof. Gavin Lawrence at UCLA. It's definitely not because he likes the guy.
He took over philos 168 the semester after this guy did it.Considering its not his norm to teach courses it seems Matthews probably got fired and they needed a guy asap to do his course the following semester.
 
>wrote a 800 page manifesto with +10k uses of the word nigger
>threatened to shoot up UCLA

Reality is often stranger than people think. The CIA for example managed to convince Rural Filipinos that vampires were real and that they hunted communists. A lot of shit is often mind bogglingly retarded.
whatdidireadcompootrscrene.png
 
Greetings fellow Kiwis, thanks for tuning in to StudioBixnoodia for our dramatized reading of DEATH Sentences, a manifesto in nine books, by Dr. Matthew C. Harris. Before we get into todays broadcast I have a note here that I am supposed to do an ad read: So remember Kiwis, all of today's content is brought to you in part by the letter 'N'. I wonder what the word of the day could be? Anyway, here's some fresh content:

Book 1, Section 4 (2:27, ends p16)

Book 1, Section 5 (29:25, ends p25)

Book 1, Section 6 (18:55, ends p29)
In case you missed it: Here is the link to my previous post.
Artists Notes: Frankly section 4 feels like a blurry memory from a fever dream. Obviously it was much shorter and nothing really jumper out at me. Dr. Harris was fucking on one in section 5. He'd probably hate me for saying this but I can see a PhD philosopher deep down in there under all of the crazy. He really hit his stride on the wall-of-text production as well. All 9 FUCKING PAGES of section 4 are one single spaced paragraph. I'm not sure if it's having to read this (already really repetitive) repeatedly to record and I'm starting to "go native" but I'm kind of starting to hate the droneman and the unworthyman too. P20 was really the star of the show in that section (thumbnail):
P20.png
I also tried to get a little blacker with my voice. Still a redneck but I've met black rednecks that sound kind of like that. I have a kind of weird hangup where I've always hated my recorded voice. Apparently some of that flows from hearing myself too. So I did all of today with Lil Wayne, T Pain, DMX, Fetty Wap, and Desiigner playing in my headphones while I recorded. That hangup is part of why I shipped first-takes before, today's audio is shipping with me listening to just enough to make sure it's there/working. Critique would be appreciated and if my "soul music" strategy helped, can someone link me some playlists of particularly black music? I'm running low already.

Finally, a giant thank you and my eternal gratitude to @snailslime who was patient enough with my autism to help me get Audacity working so I am not using a voice notes app. I literally would not have been able to do these longer readings today without the tools it added. I also did some noise reduction that got rid of the whine plaguing my earliest recordings. If today's content was better than a couple of days ago, that's pretty much entirely her doing.

Now if you fine NIGGER will excuse me, I am going to pick up some Swisher Sweets and malt liquor.

Edit:
I want the guys who ghostwrite all Drake’s rhymes to make his next album up purely of slightly adapted quotes from this 800 pages of absolutely based NIGGER thought
On the off-chance anyone with a MIDI pad and actual rhythm wants to sample any of these MP3s, and just generally to handle Copyright overall. All recordings from StudioBixnoodia for this project are released for general use in a personal/commercial/any capacity. I'm calling it a "donut care" license. As in: I largely do not ("donut") care what anyone does with these recordings, in whole or in part, as long as they are not A) Hampering others open access and B) Doing something exceptional with this that forces me to have to care. This is a labor of love for laughs and experience. Not sharing would be counterintuitive.
 
Last edited:
Seems like a case of someone who was developing/developed schizophrenia and decided to do psychedelics, do we have any info on how he was years ago?
the best predictor for developing schizophrenia is having a relative with schizophrenia. If its in your immediate family the chances of developing it rise to one out of four. That is way higher than using psychedelics. Even heavy use tends to cause temporary problems rather than permanent (not saying it doesn't happen because it obviously does! no drug is 100% safe for everyone).
 
as i skim through this most glorious text I can't help but feel like this could be the start of a new Religion. Such words of enlightenment I have not seen before. So may I share an inspirational passage from Book 5, chapter 2.

View attachment 2956646
Dude is so fucking aggressive with his worlds he's typing like a shitposter on meth.
 
Back