- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
Here you go.No way! I've got to see the citation on that.
The one about a continuity explains an awful lot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here you go.No way! I've got to see the citation on that.
I'd only be even remotely ok with this if they brought in Carole Ann Ford to do a proper regeneration, (and even then that would probably be the *only* thing I actually liked about it.)You really want to fix it?
have it be revealed that Jodie was actually a regeneration of Susan and this was all an elaborate plot to locate her grandfather who had gone missing.
The problem with axing Doctor Who is that its the one BBC production with international appeal and merchandising potential. The Chav Hour and We Wuz Queenz may be cheaper to produce, but no one outside of Britain watches that shit. Obviously, nu-Who is tanking in the ratings, but I guarantee you its still profitable. And if they actually made an effort*, they could turn it into a decent moneymaker.
*Fire Chinball, stop catering to twitter mobs, focus on the sci-fi/adventure aspects, cast a good looking doctor and a hot chick as his companion = easy win
Doctor Who has a lot of potential, like, what if they did the darker twist they never got the chance to in the '90s.The problem with axing Doctor Who is that its the one BBC production with international appeal and merchandising potential. The Chav Hour and We Wuz Queenz may be cheaper to produce, but no one outside of Britain watches that shit. Obviously, nu-Who is tanking in the ratings, but I guarantee you its still profitable. And if they actually made an effort*, they could turn it into a decent moneymaker.
*Fire Chinball, stop catering to twitter mobs, focus on the sci-fi/adventure aspects, cast a good looking doctor and a hot chick as his companion = easy win
The problem with axing Doctor Who is that its the one BBC production with international appeal and merchandising potential. The Chav Hour and We Wuz Queenz may be cheaper to produce, but no one outside of Britain watches that shit. Obviously, nu-Who is tanking in the ratings, but I guarantee you its still profitable. And if they actually made an effort*, they could turn it into a decent moneymaker.
*Fire Chinball, stop catering to twitter mobs, focus on the sci-fi/adventure aspects, cast a good looking doctor and a hot chick as his companion = easy win
I hate to say this but I highly doubt it's as profitable as it once was if the ratings are tanking that badly.
The Classic Who stuff though, though I believe that's still profitable but no one except twitter lunatics seem to care for Jodie or the woke garbage.
Time to see if what'll happen in 1989 will happen now: cancel and wait 15-20 years. Except next time, it'll probably be a reboot because everyone is doing that shit.Doctor Who has a lot of potential, like, what if they did the darker twist they never got the chance to in the '90s.
You know I think the return of Eccleston will save Dr. Who. And somewhere ClownfishTV is smiling because of this. And hey at least it avoided the downfall of similar Sci-fi stuff like Star Wars (for there bad sequel trilogy) and Star Trek (for the Picard series).First trailer for Eccleston's Big Finish story has dropped:
It feels slightly surreal having him back as the Doctor after all this time. Can't wait to hear this in full.
It's Jodie's last season anyway, so if Chibbs goes with her we'll be in a new era regardless.You know I think the return of Eccleston will save Dr. Who. And somewhere ClownfishTV is smiling because of this. And hey at least it avoided the downfall of similar Sci-fi stuff like Star Wars (for there bad sequel trilogy) and Star Trek (for the Picard series).
The BBC mandates for woke shit aren't going anywhere, however.It's Jodie's last season anyway, so if Chibbs goes with her we'll be in a new era regardless.
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if Thirteen regenerates into Jo Martin for a BIPOC lead character since we've already seen that she's a future version of the Doctor.The BBC mandates for woke shit aren't going anywhere, however.
Wouldn't bank on that myself. The Davies and Moffat eras spanned two Doctors, so we may be stuck with Chibi a bit longer.It's Jodie's last season anyway, so if Chibbs goes with her we'll be in a new era regardless.
It's specifically stated the Ruth Doctor is one of the Timeless Child Doctors, so it won't be her unless they do some timey wimey shit or do a 180 and jettison that entire plotline which honestly wouldn't be a bad trade off but I doubt that's their plan.Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if Thirteen regenerates into Jo Martin for a BIPOC lead character since we've already seen that she's a future version of the Doctor.
When I think of a woman Doctor, someone like Jo Martin or Gomez comes to mind. Jodie is the bland middle ground where she has no character and is never wrong.Wouldn't bank on that myself. The Davies and Moffat eras spanned two Doctors, so we may be stuck with Chibi a bit longer.
Plus, it hasn't actually been 100% confirmed Jodie's leaving, although that probably is the case. 3-4 years is generally the average tenure for a Doctor.
It's specifically stated the Ruth Doctor is one of the Timeless Child Doctors, so it won't be her unless they do some timey wimey shit or do a 180 and jettison that entire plotline which honestly wouldn't be a bad trade off but I doubt that's their plan.
The sad thing is, I actually like the Ruth Doctor as a character and I thought Jo Martin did a really good job. Hell, she was more Doctor-ish in her five minutes or so of screentime as the Doctor than Jodie is most of the time. It just makes me hate the fact she's shackled to an absolutely terrible plot point even more.
Even there I don't think that's her fault. The video she did in-character telling everyone to stay safe during the lockdown was sweet and she did a better job capturing the Doctor's character while she was ad-libbing than an entire writing staff did.When I think of a woman Doctor, someone like Jo Martin or Gomez comes to mind. Jodie is the bland middle ground where she has no character and is never wrong.
I've only seen that episode once and I was so mad at the destruction of the show's history that I must have missed that, thanks for clarifying.It's specifically stated the Ruth Doctor is one of the Timeless Child Doctors, so it won't be her unless they do some timey wimey shit or do a 180 and jettison that entire plotline which honestly wouldn't be a bad trade off but I doubt that's their plan.
Exactly. Someone with gravitas. Too bad they already used Gomez on Missy. A Doctor should have some gravitas under the snark.When I think of a woman Doctor, someone like Jo Martin or Gomez comes to mind.
This is why Capaldi, Smith and Eccelston work so well. I like Tennant too but he's not as classically good as the others if that makes sense.Exactly. Someone with gravitas. Too bad they already used Gomez on Missy. A Doctor should have some gravitas under the snark.
I've liked Tennant in all the episodes I've seen with him, but then, I've only watched a smattering of the universally acclaimed ones like "Midnight." That was really good, but almost more of a Twilight Zone episode than Doctor Who.This is why Capaldi, Smith and Eccelston work so well. I like Tennant too but he's not as classically good as the others if that makes sense.
There's nothing left to save at this point. The show is still fucked in a way that nothing short of a soft reboot (which will never happen) could fix, and Big Finish has already been fairly decent despite some creeping wokeness lately.You know I think the return of Eccleston will save Dr. Who. And somewhere ClownfishTV is smiling because of this. And hey at least it avoided the downfall of similar Sci-fi stuff like Star Wars (for there bad sequel trilogy) and Star Trek (for the Picard series).