- Joined
- Oct 1, 2019
I'm often told that I am very intelligent and I produce quality work for my job, but school never interested me and I didn't make good grades. What means of proving my intellectual integrity are strong enough to realistically substitute for grades? My unweighted GPA was 2.54, and weighted was 2.63.
During my time in Uni interesting part was I learned of a lot of programmers that learned to balance their life/programming career and If i remember exactly some guy I knew finished his undergrad with an average grade score of ~9.5/10 (my country's grading). He was very nice and knew how to balance things. Most likely he now works on a big company and I hope he is treated well and makes tons of money.
Alternatively i met many dumb idiots that thought they were too smart for the system and never bothered to study, these god damn retards were also socially inept and flunked uni.
Speaking of niceness I decided to look into stallman's kind communication guidelines:
It's basically a list telling people not to sperg the fuck out In the development chatroom. it amazes to me that some fat autistic communist autist can design better communication guidelines than most modern age degenerates.
also from RMS:
2. I disagree with making "diversity" a goal. If the developers in a
specific free software project do not include demographic D, I don't
think that the lack of them as a problem that requires action; there
is no need to scramble desperately to recruit some Ds. Rather, the
problem is that if we make demographic D feel unwelcome, we lose out
on possible contributors. And very likely also others that are not in
demographic D.
There is a kind of diversity that would benefit many free software
projects: diversity of users in regard to skill levels and kinds of
usage. However, that is not what people usually mean by "diversity".