Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
We hit the jack pot
He buried more awards on the bottom. I take it these are the trash ones unlike the gay LARP medals.
more fucking awards.JPG
 
Honestly I really need to click more Wikipedia user profiles to see how much gay shit they plaster their accounts with, some of them are super dedicated.
That would’ve filled with all kinds of dumb shit
 
"This user has made 7 women blue."

As in made them sad? As in turned them into Democrats? As in applied blue body paint to them? I'm not sure which would be more pathetic.
Welcome to Women in Red (WiR)! We are a group of editors of all genders living around the world focused on reducing systemic bias in the wiki movement. We recognized a need for this work as, in October 2014, only 15.53% of English Wikipedia's biographies were about women.[1] Founded in July 2015, WiR strives to increase the percentage, which, according to Humaniki has reached 19.22% as of 11 April 2022. But that means that of 1,883,407 biographies, only 362,040 are about women.[2] Not impressed? "Content gender gap" is a form of systemic bias, and WiR addresses it in a positive way through shared values.

Some woke shit for wikispergs to sperg over. Guess they'll need to find more literal who actresses and models to write five paragraphs about.
 
Some woke shit for wikispergs to sperg over. Guess they'll need to find more literal who actresses and models to write five paragraphs about.
Ah, okay. Links to non-existent articles are red but turn blue if the article is created. I get it now.

But I suppose it would have been too much to ask for them to have just used an unambiguous phrase that didn't require explanation. "This user has created 7 new articles about women." Wow, much admirable my dude, but gender is a social construct, bigot.
 
Back