- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Total BLP. This is what BLP now means on WikiTrannyPedo.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
What a boring unnecessary article. They might as well make it a redirect to [[New Labour]].
> [Rowling] said that she supported abortion rights, especially in underdeveloped countries
I'm sure they don't mean it, but this makes her sound like a hell of a racist.
Molly White's Breast Milk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
Just look at the Harry Potter universe: the people who control the banks are short, hooked nosed goblins and wizards didn't stop the holocaust. Rowling is fucking based.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Just a random thing I noticed when going into the page of Divine Judgment (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_judgment) there is this template heresy:
Apperantly it's forbidden to quote from the bible (this will obviously not apply to anything quoting from the Quran) unless you add some faggot telling you how it's wrong.
BlueSpark
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2016
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2018
Well I've noticed just today that they've upended the look of the site for no real reason. It's almost the same but just worse instead, and hasn't applied across the entirety of the articles I visit for some reason. But otherwise the whole site has just been centered and so compacted you'd think it's 2000 and they're designing it for 4:3 monitors, but instead it's 2023 and they're making it look worse for everyone because go fuck yourself I guess.
I'm on a 32:9 monitor myself and in my personal opinion, it fuckin sucks lmao. Or maybe I'm just autistic. But it really sucks when websites don't scale themselves for those on wider screens and leave a ton of completely unused space.
Comparison between a Wayback archive from December and now:
I'm on a 32:9 monitor myself and in my personal opinion, it fuckin sucks lmao. Or maybe I'm just autistic. But it really sucks when websites don't scale themselves for those on wider screens and leave a ton of completely unused space.
Comparison between a Wayback archive from December and now:
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
Am I only the one who adjusts his browser window for comfortable reading?
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
Changing desktop view of Wikipedia to the mobile interface and forcing the reader to manually click the side of the screen to not have over half the screen swallowed by glaring white light makes Wikipedia more welcoming for grandpa, babushka, and their African children.
The poor man looks dead inside.
The poor man looks dead inside.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
Holy fuck I thought you were just a phonefag but no this shit is on desktop now too. It's absolutely garish and horrid.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
It is, but you can turn it off easily enough. Preferences > Appearance > Vector legacy (2010)
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
This has been a long time coming, as the skin's been released before September 2022, though a lot of people were unhappy about it while it was in the testing phase. The outrage is happening today because it's been made the default skin for all users, especially unregistered ones who can't go into their preferences and change it back. If you want to harvest some milk check out Wikipedia talk:Vector 2022.
Womble of Wimbledon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
Fuck the internet. It is now designed for retards who access it exclusively through their fucking mobile phone
ditto
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2019
The name of that file is WP20Symbols_community1_light_background.svg.
That's Nu-Wikipedia's symbol for "community"
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
They claim that they made it that way because having less horizontal text apparently makes reading comprehension easier. Still, they really should have added visible options to adjust the width of the article.
Really though, it was sad to read PCmag's article on this and see a quote from GorillaWarfare, yet another autistic tech nerd that has deluded himself into believing he's a woman and has been involved in keeping misinformation about the Farms on Wikipedia.
Really though, it was sad to read PCmag's article on this and see a quote from GorillaWarfare, yet another autistic tech nerd that has deluded himself into believing he's a woman and has been involved in keeping misinformation about the Farms on Wikipedia.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
GorillaWarfare is an actual woman.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
So much for NPOV. How could you possibly know what a religion believes if you completely ignore the actual scripture the religion teaches? No, instead quote Rick & Morty-tier atheist bullshit because some fedoralord clearly knows more about a religion than the people who have studied Talmudic scholarship for literally thousands of years.
I fucking hate Wikipedia so fucking much, die wikiniggers.
Like it or not, Molly White is the legitimate possessor of two X chromosomes.
BootlegPopeye
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2021
Looking through this and reading between the lines from the tech bullshit excuses, seems like this is an attempt to get people to register accounts by annoying them to death with the shitty new interface. So someone else points out that the WMF funds a bunch of stupid, non-Wikipedia related third party shit and servers costs are well covered, but the defenders keep repeating a version of this line - that this would STRAIN THE SERVERS.
The old interface wasn't great either, it loaded a gimped version of the site in mobile that didn't show the entire contents of the talk page(meaning I had to force desktop mode to read talk page drama) and desktop mode itself was too small on a Hi DPI desktop monitor, but somehow they made it even worse from that shitty start point.
Now it blasts even MORE whitespace at you like we're still using 4:3 monitors to browse on desktop, and still no dark mode option/browser detection.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
Slate article on the redesign, carrying on the proud journalistic tradition of having headlines which are completely inaccurate: Wikipedia’s Redesign Is Barely Noticeable. That’s the Point. (archive)
TLDR: Absolutely everyone hates it, to the point where they even lost a vote in an RFC, but they went ahead and did it anyway.
TLDR: Absolutely everyone hates it, to the point where they even lost a vote in an RFC, but they went ahead and did it anyway.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2021
I actually like the lower width, the issue is just that every article also has ten thousand pointless images and boxes to the side that shrink it even further. 2/3 of my screen width is taken up by browser tabs, outlines and boxes, god damn.
E: While I'm at it, the image spam on the English Wikipedia seriously pisses me off. You look up some article on the Cauchy transformation or whatever, and you're treated to three images of random people who once farted in Cauchy's general direction but had nothing to do with the transformation. What do these contribute? Why add them? The other language versions don't do this shit.
E: While I'm at it, the image spam on the English Wikipedia seriously pisses me off. You look up some article on the Cauchy transformation or whatever, and you're treated to three images of random people who once farted in Cauchy's general direction but had nothing to do with the transformation. What do these contribute? Why add them? The other language versions don't do this shit.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
Some sperg is whining about the skin change as a conspiracy to harm autists, and another one counters the "all autists hate this new skin" claim.