Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
I did not know this and I did not want to know this:

wikiknow.PNG
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Zaryiu2, Corpun, Dan Schneider and 13 others
Pitbull Victim said:
I did not know this and I did not want to know this:

View attachment 4273684
Click to expand...
General Emílio Médici said:
...what?

Oh my god it's a book about some troon telling people to fuck troons and suck the feminine penis. What a amazing article to feature Wikipedia, this will sure help stop transphobia!
Click to expand...
You'd think that section on the main page would be for genuinely interesting stuff, as Wikipedia makes itself out to be, but that article was specifically written by Tamzin, an administrator who self-identifies as a disabled queer trans woman. Remember, school children read Wikipedia every day, and they get to see someone's AGP fetish on wild display, unwillingly.

Jew_Trans_Soul_Rebel.jpg

Also promoted it to Good Article status. Read this shit.

"Emphasizing sex acts possible with flaccid penises or not involving penises at all, it coined the term "muffing" to refer to stimulation of the inguinal canal, and popularized that act."

That definitely is a great argument on why this article is the best that Wikipedia can produce.

Doesn't matter anyway, they can promote anything they want, and some folks noticed here that there is no record for it in the DYK and GA promotion records. They are doing a think called the "Wikicup" now for these specific entries to be promoted. Weird as shit.

690-490-7443743.PNG
 
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: Zaryiu2, Mexican_Wizard_711, fat ass and 11 others
AnOminous said:
There's actually Reliable Source for that shit, too. He was actually in it, and he really did say "That kid kicked sand in Cool Cat's face!"

ETA: One of my favorite aspects of Wikipedia retardation is how there is this dude who has some kind of weird monopoly on fetish art in articles even though he draws like whatever fag draws every single wikihow.

Example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellatio

There's at least one other dude like this, who has an obsession with interracial porn and somehow managed to insert his pictures, 100% of them shit like a white dude getting blown by an Asian chick, into every fucking article where it was remotely relevant.
Click to expand...
ThErE hE iS!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demislob
Wikipedo seethes over JK Rowling's talk page about how the article talks about the book that she wrote and made her famous all the time and not her transphobia.

Talk:J. K. Rowling - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

I do not believe the introduction of this article are currently written from a sufficiently neutral point of view, specifically in that the contraversy surrounding rowling's views on gender and transness in politics are not given their due weight in the introduction, while her book series Harry potter, which is not the focus of this article, is given undue weight taking up half of the first paragraph, is the background focus of the second paragraph summarizing her life, and is given the entirity of the third paragraph for introductory literary analysis and a summary of its early critical reception.

This article is meant to be about rowling, not harry potter, and yet harry potter dominates while information about her current affairs and opinions are relegated to two sentences buried underneath four paragraphs, two standard desktop screens, and four standard phone screens. And, when the introduction does finally break the topic of conversation, doesn't to overview her opinions, but instead provides an overview of the reaction to those beliefs that is not at all descriptive. It's describing the shadows on plato's alogrical wall instead of the beliefs of the person casting those shadows, and again this article is supposed to be about rowling, not harry potter nor the people criticizing rowling. It's supposed to be about rowling.

By overweighing harry potter and underweighing rowling's current activity as a self-identified terf (as a significant portion of new articles about her have been about her alleged transphobic beliefs rather than about her work as an author), this article is failing to be neutral by eneffect minimizing rowling's very relevant current political beliefs and actions in favor of focusing on her less currently relevant old work.

It is my opinion, that revisions should be considered to bring the framing of the article's introduction more into line with my interpretation of wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality and due weight. Unfortunately, I have neither the practiced ability nor the neccessary permissions to write those revisions, and am only able to voice my disatisfaction with the current version of article. Sebastiantemple (talk) 19:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

J. K. Rowling's women-only women's shelter is transphobic because it excludes people "assigned male at birth" :
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Zaryiu2, Drama Fan, Markass the Worst and 3 others
lolcow yoghurt said:
Wikipedo seethes over JK Rowling's talk page about how the article talks about the book that she wrote and made her famous all the time and not her transphobia.
Click to expand...
So much for BLP. Articles on "problematic" people have to be total hit pieces and nothing more.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mexican_Wizard_711, Markass the Worst, lolcow yoghurt and 2 others
Dan Schneider said:
You'd think that section on the main page would be for genuinely interesting stuff, as Wikipedia makes itself out to be, but that article was specifically written by Tamzin, an administrator who self-identifies as a disabled queer trans woman. Remember, school children read Wikipedia every day, and they get to see someone's AGP fetish on wild display, unwillingly.

View attachment 4275885
Also promoted it to Good Article status. Read this shit.

"Emphasizing sex acts possible with flaccid penises or not involving penises at all, it coined the term "muffing" to refer to stimulation of the inguinal canal, and popularized that act."

That definitely is a great argument on why this article is the best that Wikipedia can produce.

Doesn't matter anyway, they can promote anything they want, and some folks noticed here that there is no record for it in the DYK and GA promotion records. They are doing a think called the "Wikicup" now for these specific entries to be promoted. Weird as shit.

View attachment 4275931
Click to expand...
I notice "Sarah" Ashton-Cirillo, a Twitter addicted troon "war journalist" who larps as a Ukrainian soldier, is on there. In a sane world, someone like that wouldn't even have an article.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Corpun, Dolomite, Clownish and 4 others
Dan Schneider said:
You'd think that section on the main page would be for genuinely interesting stuff, as Wikipedia makes itself out to be, but that article was specifically written by Tamzin, an administrator who self-identifies as a disabled queer trans woman. Remember, school children read Wikipedia every day, and they get to see someone's AGP fetish on wild display, unwillingly.

View attachment 4275885
Also promoted it to Good Article status. Read this shit.

"Emphasizing sex acts possible with flaccid penises or not involving penises at all, it coined the term "muffing" to refer to stimulation of the inguinal canal, and popularized that act."

That definitely is a great argument on why this article is the best that Wikipedia can produce.

Doesn't matter anyway, they can promote anything they want, and some folks noticed here that there is no record for it in the DYK and GA promotion records. They are doing a think called the "Wikicup" now for these specific entries to be promoted. Weird as shit.

View attachment 4275931
Click to expand...
Lmao we don’t even need to put a triangle on them they literally tattoo it on their biceps
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures, fat ass, Toolbox and 4 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dolomite, Markass the Worst, lolcow yoghurt and 1 other person
The article for trichloroethylene on Wikipedia is full of news about USA or how evil it is (gives you cancer when you say trichloroethylene 3 times ).
Nothing really about the chemical itself, like who discovered it first, nope here's your Fentanyltown, USA, Sneed school trichloroethylene incident news.

byuu said:
Speaking of Rowling, there is a whole extra article just for her political views:
en.wikipedia.org

Political views of J. K. Rowling - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
The longest section is for trannies. The most referenced section is for trannies. All for trannies. JK Rowling kills trannies.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Drama Fan, Markass the Worst, Moral Decay and 4 others
The Tranny hate over J.K. Rowling's complete milquetoast light criticism of them is the best way to redpill normies on the Troon question. These people don't want "acceptance", they don't want to "be allowed to live". They want constant, endless praise and attention from everyone at all times. Narcissistic mental cases the lot of them.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Late
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures, Oats12345, indomitable snowman and 13 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back