Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Good to know that people who like ants crawling over them are also goatfuckers.

Another case was described in 2012. At the age of 14, the patient saw an ice-cream stick covered with ants, and wondered how it would feel if his penis was in place of the stick. He began letting ants crawl on his genitals, especially fire ants, a practice he found sexually exciting and that continued into adulthood. The patient was socially and intellectually competent. He was also attracted to dogs and goats
Click to expand...
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Elim Garak, UnsufficentBoobage, Mr. Awesome Man and 9 others
Do talk pages count for dumb shit on Wikipedia? Some third-worlder has posted incredible religious revelations on the talk page for Allah.

PLEASE ALLOW ME TO EDIT THIS PAGE I HAVE A VERY PRECIOUS KNOWLEDGE FOR EVERYONE I WANT TO MAKE A CHANGE IN ITS INTRODUCTION THAT THE WORD IS NOT ORIGINALLY INVENTED IN ARABIC LANGUAGE BUT IT WAS TAKEN FROM THE SANSKRIT LANGUAGE WORD ALLAH OR ILAH WHICH MEANS GODDESS OR SHAKTI(THE FEMININE PART OF THE GOD).

I WANT TO TO BUST THIS MYTH THAT ISLAM IS INDEPENDENT.

IT IS A PART OF THE SANATAN DHARMA (ETERNAL DHARMA). ALL THE STORY OF ISLAM'S ORIGIN IS BRIEFLY DESCRIBED IN THE BHAVISHYA PURAN. THERE IS A PROPER EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION OF ISLAM.

SO PLEASE LET THE WORLD KNOW THIS FACT THAT ALL MUSLIMS ARE WORSHIPING MAHADEV (LORD SHIVA). IT WILL BE A PLEASURE TO ME. THANKING YOU YOURS FAITHFULLY
Click to expand...
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Mr. Awesome Man, Super Collie and 4 others
Save the Loli said:
Do talk pages count for dumb shit on Wikipedia? Some third-worlder has posted incredible religious revelations on the talk page for Allah.
Click to expand...

Much of the dumbest shit on Wikipedia is in talk pages.

I sometimes wish we'd get an ex Wikipedia nerd here to translate from the insane bullshit that goes on in ArbCom disputes. The autism is so thick it's pretty much incomprehensible to outsiders.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Mr. Awesome Man, Super Collie and 8 others
I found this Wikipedia user
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Niabot
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Niabot

Some of his extermely important work that needs to be on Wikipedia's Servers
797px-Vergleich_zwischen_Manga_und_Foto.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vergleich_zwischen_Manga_und_Foto.jpg
English: Comparison between a photograph and a drawing in anime/manga style from the same viewpoint.
Deutsch: Vergleich zwischen einer Fotografie und einer Zeichnung im Anime/Manga-Stil vom gleichen Motiv.
Français : Comparaison entre une photographie et un dessin en style manga sur le même fond.
Bahasa Indonesia: Perbandingan antara foto dan gambar bergaya anime/manga dari sudut pandang yang sama.
中文: 同一視點照片與動漫風格繪畫的對照比較
Click to expand...

Fuwafuwa-chan.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fuwafuwa-chan.jpg

Sukumizu_Girl_recolored.jpg

Deutsch: Zeichnung eines einen Sukumizu tragenden Mädchens in einem für Anime und Manga typischen Zeichenstil. Die Augen sind unterschiedlich farbig (Iris-Heterochromie) was bei Figuren in diesem Stil durchaus häufiger anzufinden ist. Schließlich ist es eine recht einfache Modifikation um Charakteren ein individuelles Aussehen zu geben oder zweigeteilte Persönlichkeit anzudeuten.
English: Drawing of girl wearing a Sukumizu in a typical drawing style for anime and manga.
Click to expand...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sukumizu_Girl_recolored.jpg

412px-Anime_girl_at_beach.jpg
English: A girl drawn in anime style at the beach. Created with MyPaint.
Deutsch: Ein mädchen, gezeichnet im Anime Stil, am Strand. Erstellt mit MyPaint.
Click to expand...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anime_girl_at_beach.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Potd/2011-05-16&diff=prev&oldid=54427249
Changing to something that's less fapworthy, more educational. While I have no problems with erotic fantasies, even of the derivative and artistically unimportant kind depicted here, IMO the main page of Commons usually isn't the place for it.
Click to expand...
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Aspiring Artist, BlueSpark, UnsufficentBoobage and 6 others
ICametoLurk said:
I found this Wikipedia user
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Niabot
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Niabot

Some of his extermely important work that needs to be on Wikipedia's Servers
797px-Vergleich_zwischen_Manga_und_Foto.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vergleich_zwischen_Manga_und_Foto.jpg
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure Niabot is a girl; in fact, it can be suspected that the person in the image's right-hand part is her herself.


BTW I still don't get why Altschauerberg, which is just a handful of farmhouses huddled together in the Franconian hills, is sufficiently relevant to get an article, while Drachenlord, the only semi-famous person living in the area, isn't.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Altschauerberg/Archiv
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: Aspiring Artist, UnsufficentBoobage, Mr. Awesome Man and 5 others
StraightShooter said:
True, I'm just surprised that a popular mainstream website has allowed actual pedophiles to edit, and even features a "mascot" drawn by a "loli porn artist" and this hasn't resulted in some type of media controversy. I have a feeling if something like that happened on Youtube or Facebook there would've been a huge media shitstorm by now, and of course Reddit has gotten media flack for the perverse content hosted there, while Wikipedia has somehow slipped under the radar and is still more or less regarded well by the mainstream.
Click to expand...

If wikipedia gets flack from a mainstream news site, guess who is going under the "untrusted media outlet" list.

Looking at most of the top people editing, approving this shit and the way they like to tend towards pointless verbosity in their writing like a basement dwelling intellectual makes me think "respected" editors on wikipedia are probably Neogaf and reddit admins with large loli and CP folders on their hard drives. Either living with their parents or under disability.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak, Mr. Awesome Man, Super Collie and 8 others
CowReserach Inc. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoë_Quinn

2 pages of talk on how Zoe Quinn should be Zoë Quinn. After she changed her Twitter name. But it turns out, Zoe changed her mind later and decided Zöe Quinn was cooler.
Click to expand...

That would mean you're supposed to pronounce it something sounding sort of like "Zerry."

What a stupid fucking cunt.

Just call this fucking whore Chelsea van Valkenburg if she can't even decide what her fake made-up name is.

StraightShooter said:
True, I'm just surprised that a popular mainstream website has allowed actual pedophiles to edit, and even features a "mascot" drawn by a "loli porn artist" and this hasn't resulted in some type of media controversy. I have a feeling if something like that happened on Youtube or Facebook there would've been a huge media shitstorm by now, and of course Reddit has gotten media flack for the perverse content hosted there, while Wikipedia has somehow slipped under the radar and is still more or less regarded well by the mainstream.
Click to expand...

Dude, Wikipedia had David Gerard as their media spokesperson for the UK.

funboy.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Elim Garak, UnsufficentBoobage, Mr. Awesome Man and 5 others
Syaoran Li said:
I knew Wikipedia had its problems, but I did not know that the rabbit hole went this deep. As others have said, they're dancing in TV Tropes territory with some of this shit.
Click to expand...
They always were. The overwhelming autism of Wikipedia editors is why "fan wikis" exist in the first place. There was a time when every third article on Wikipedia was flooded with spergery about cartoon and video game minutia instead of the way it is now, where all that shit is kept in the "In Popular Culture" section and pruned mercilessly.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Elim Garak, UnsufficentBoobage, Super Collie and 5 others
frozenrunner said:
They always were. The overwhelming autism of Wikipedia editors is why "fan wikis" exist in the first place. There was a time when every third article on Wikipedia was flooded with spergery about cartoon and video game minutia instead of the way it is now, where all that shit is kept in the "In Popular Culture" section and pruned mercilessly.
Click to expand...

Or on Wikia, where pure autism gets turned into pure money!
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Super Collie, BR55 and 7 others
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak and DykesDykesChina
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back