Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
If you don't watch wrestling, one of the most polarizing wrestlers lately has been Roman Reigns.

Wikipedia has an article on Roman's hatedom.

Why is this a separate article and not a sub-section?

If it can't be in the actual article because of BLP, it shouldn't be a separate article, and just shouldn't be there at all.

Also you phoneposting fags need to quit linking to mobile versions of articles.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mushroom_ketchup
(This one stands out to me because the picture they used looks like shit in a cup)

200w.gif
 
I don't think this has been posted yet, but we all have to admire the heading picture for "Quick time event".


2560px-Quick_time_event_mockup.jpg


This is supposed to represent an in-game screenshot of a quick-time event in a video game. Out of all the hundreds of examples in popular games, they had to make their own mediocre version.

Press X to ... what? Start the game?
 
This isn't actually Dumb Shit on Wikipedia. It's actually really good text on Wikipedia.

"After his death, Satie's friends discovered an apartment replete with squalor and chaos."

This is just worded really well and is exactly what you would have expected to find in Erik Satie's apartment after he died.

Also if you don't know who Erik Satie was, you should. Here's a starter.

 
Why does Wikipedia allow random drawings of historical figures who don't have a picture uploaded? I know that copyright issues prevent certain leaders from having their actual photos uploaded, but if you're going to allow "fan art" of leaders, it better be really fucking good, like the picture they have of Kim Jong-un on his article.

Case in point, this picture of an early president of Honduras. Not something I'd expect to see on a serious website like Wikipedia.

General_Francisco_Ferrera.JPG
 
Why does Wikipedia allow random drawings of historical figures who don't have a picture uploaded? I know that copyright issues prevent certain leaders from having their actual photos uploaded, but if you're going to allow "fan art" of leaders, it better be really fucking good, like the picture they have of Kim Jong-un on his article.

Case in point, this picture of an early president of Honduras. Not something I'd expect to see on a serious website like Wikipedia.

General_Francisco_Ferrera.JPG

Edgar Allen Poe evidently suffered from hydrocephaly.
 
Why does Wikipedia allow random drawings of historical figures who don't have a picture uploaded? I know that copyright issues prevent certain leaders from having their actual photos uploaded, but if you're going to allow "fan art" of leaders, it better be really fucking good, like the picture they have of Kim Jong-un on his article.

That's at least somewhat better than the fucked up porn by "seedfeeder" inserted into random articles almost always of some white dude blowing a load on some Asian chick's face.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seedfeeder

He actually became notorious enough to end up with his own article.
 
Back