Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

Rusty Metal Skull Gun said:
Also, have a look at the edit history for Ruckersville, Virginia. Not only do they revert any mention of you-know-who, they delete the edit so you can't even see it after the fact. Normally they only do this for libel or copyvios.
Click to expand...
Can someone explain why Wikipedia has such a weird aversion to anything to do with CWC?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Late
Reactions: Peace Or Love, lolcow yoghurt, Flaming Insignias and 3 others
Seafarer said:
Can someone explain why Wikipedia has such a weird aversion to anything to do with CWC?
Click to expand...
Lunatic trannies. It's always lunatic trannies.
Refiction said:
Genuinely not sure but i've never seen the amount of censorship against any kind of discourse surrounding CWC for any other person.
Click to expand...
Check the Wikipedia page on Kiwi Farms - you will not even see the name CWCki Forums because the page weasels around it by saying something around the lines of "formerly named after a transgender webcomic artist." That is how censored Chris is on Wikipedia.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Peace Or Love, Dambusters' Dog II, Corpun and 13 others
Creative Username said:
Check the Wikipedia page on Kiwi Farms - you will not even see the name CWCki Forums because the page weasels around it by saying something around the lines of "formerly named after a transgender webcomic artist." That is how censored Chris is on Wikipedia.
Click to expand...
Yeah this is the shit I’m talking about, it’s one thing to not have a page on CWC because he’s “not notable” (although that’s highly doubtful at this point), or because they think it’d invite drama or trolling or some shit, but the retarded lengths they go to in order to never directly mention him even when it’s integral to the subject of an article is genuinely baffling.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Wright, lolcow yoghurt, Flexo and 5 others
Creative Username said:
Check the Wikipedia page on Kiwi Farms - you will not even see the name CWCki Forums because the page weasels around it by saying something around the lines of "formerly named after a transgender webcomic artist." That is how censored Chris is on Wikipedia.
Click to expand...
1698957469104.png

I can't access the edit because it's been purged but it's probably just editing Chris' name on there. Why are admins so fixated on censoring Chris' identity? Does it bother them that much?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Peace Or Love, Flexo, Flaming Insignias and 4 others
Seafarer said:
Yeah this is the shit I’m talking about, it’s one thing to not have a page on CWC because he’s “not notable” (although that’s highly doubtful at this point), or because they think it’d invite drama or trolling or some shit, but the retarded lengths they go to in order to never directly mention him even when it’s integral to the subject of an article is genuinely baffling.
Click to expand...
It's probably to do with not wanting to contribute to the documentation but it seems that every other lolcow doesn't have a page. But even then some cows like DSP have some form of references on other pages. When Chris has none.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Lizard Pope and Creative Username
Refiction said:
View attachment 5463219
I can't access the edit because it's been purged but it's probably just editing Chris' name on there. Why are admins so fixated on censoring Chris' identity? Does it bother them that much?
Click to expand...
Yes. There is probably some brainrotted troon high up in Wikipedia staff who sympathises with Chris for some fucking reason, and is pulling strings to cover him up. I think Chris meets notability standards for having an article, because there are news articles about him and he's responsible for some notable things.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Wright, Drama Fan, Sicko Hunter and 3 others
Refiction said:
It's probably to do with not wanting to contribute to the documentation but it seems that every other lolcow doesn't have a page. But even then some cows like DSP have some form of references on other pages. When Chris has none.
Click to expand...
But even that's a fairly flimsy excuse. For over a decade Wikipedia had an article about the "Duclod Man", a lolcow from the 2000s who was far less notable than Chris, had been covered by far less media outlets and other sources they would consider trustworthy, and was also arguably more mentally vulnerable. Amusingly enough, the article was deleted very shortly after I saw someone else on another forum raise it as an example of why Chris should have an article, almost as if an admin caught wind of it and quickly tried to cover it up.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Surfherder, Coo Coo Bird, Sexy Peach Emoji and 14 others
There are a bunch of discussions in corners of Wikipedia about why CWC does not get an article. For instance, here is one from the admin noticeboard in August 2021:

Here's a discussion from September 2022. The hatted section has links to several other discussions:

Usually it's a combination of claiming that having an article itself is harassment or would be a vehicle for "further" harassment, assuming (probably correctly) that an article would be a time-consuming troll magnet, and a supposed lack of notability. I think I remember someone (probably GorillaWarfare) saying that anyone trying to create such an article should be considered a troll and banned, but I can't find the comment now.

Here's a representative summary from 2021:
ccw.png


This goes way back. A CWC article was deleted in 2009:

Chris-Chan does however have an entry on WikiData, and an article on the Russian Wikipedia, which however is up for deletion:
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Vecr, timewave0 and 13 others
WhiteNight said:
Chris-Chan does however have an entry on WikiData, and an article on the Russian Wikipedia, which however is up for deletion
Click to expand...
That article is unintentionally hilarious. Maybe the real reason there isn't a Wikipedia article about him is because it's impossible to write about him objectively while keeping a straight face.
Christine Weston Chandler, formerly Christian Weston Chandler (born February 24, 1982), also known as Chris-Chan, is a video blogger and web creator of the comic "Sonichu".[1] [2] Considered by some to be one of the most documented figures in history,[3] [4] Chandler, due to his unusual hobbies and deviant behavior, became a victim of massive and prolonged bullying from trolls from 4chan. Chandler could not adequately resist the trolls, constantly succumbed to their deceptions and provocations, eventually becoming more and more famous in the Internet environment and enduring ever more attacks from trolls. Despite the above, Chris-Chan also has his own loyal fans, ready to defend him from hostile attacks.[5]

Chris spent most of his life in the city of Ruckersville, where he lives, and in Charlottesville. Chris has been outside of Virginia, where these cities are located, only twice as of 2015: first, when he visited his cousin Cole in California, and secondly, when he went to Cleveland, Ohio in search of his next girlfriend with whom he corresponded (in fact, she turned out to be another troll). After an unsuccessful trip to Ohio, Chris's parents forbade him to travel outside his home state.[6]

He published the first issue of his webcomic "Sonichu" on March 24, 2005.[9] The character of the same name is a hybrid of Sonic the Hedgehog and Pikachu.[7] [10]

He became famous on the Internet in late 2007, after attracting the attention of users of the sites 4chan and Encyclopedia Dramatica. The initial fascination was due to his signature homemade Sonichu medallion (subsequently stolen and burned), his childhood drawings of his unoriginal repainted Sonic, and wandering around in public places. Because of this, Christian became a victim of online harassment and trolling.[2]

That same year, he began identifying as a trans lesbian named Christine Weston Chandler. He was arrested in 2014 after attempting to steal a box of Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric from a local GameStop store and assaulting an employee before leaving.

On July 30, 2021, audio recordings were released in which Christian claimed to have raped his feeble-minded, dementia-suffering mother. The two were separated by the local police department on the same day.[12] On August 1, he was arrested on charges of incest.[13] [14]
Click to expand...
Imagining a babushka sitting behind an aging CRT monitor in her grey apartment in Novosibirsk scrolling through this article and wondering what the fuck she's reading about
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Wright, Vecr and 15 others
WhiteNight said:
Chris-Chan does however have an entry on WikiData, and an article on the Russian Wikipedia, which however is up for deletion:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q98406706 https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A7%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%80,_%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD_%D0%A3%D1%8D%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD
Click to expand...
The article looks like a stub, but at least it's not banned due to harassment or some other bullshit.
Reading history also shows some retards being butthurt about Chris's pronouns, among other things.
not gonna translate this bullshit.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, Flaming Insignias and scathefire
>Bullied the "most trustworthy wiki site" on the internet into not even daring to speak his name on any official page or article, let alone make one on him, AND to insist he is a woman whenever they do talk about him in private
Teflon Tard strikes again! I guess that means that Wikipedia can be bullied into submission and be tampered with/re-written at any point in time, there is just method to the madness. Good to know!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peace Or Love, Wright, lolcow yoghurt and 4 others
30+GameOvers said:
>Bullied the "most trustworthy wiki site" on the internet into not even daring to speak his name on any official page or article, let alone make one on him, AND to insist he is a woman whenever they do talk about him in private
Teflon Tard strikes again! I guess that means that Wikipedia can be bullied into submission and be tampered with/re-written at any point in time, there is just method to the madness. Good to know!
Click to expand...
I never thought about it that way but when you do it's pretty impressive. If Chris weren't completely retarded, he could gloat evilly about it. "I can RAPE MY OWN MOM FOR MONTHS and those PUSSIES can't even make an article about me even after international news stations have stories about it!"
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Peace Or Love, Surfherder, Wright and 4 others
ToroidalBoat said:
The Nazi Party is described by Wikipedia as being "far-right", which of course has a rather different meaning in Clown World.

(the conservative newspaper "The Epoch Times" is also described by Wikipedia as being "far-right")
Click to expand...

Wikipedia editors would actually expand the amount of things and people described as far right to ridiculous levels if there wasn't some autists there preventing them from doing so. For a lot of these peoples, and the journos they're in bed with, far right would be anybody who is just not updated on the latest decrees set by the party.

For anyone else who is not totally nuts, the far right is a post-war movement.

There is a lot of autism and debate to be had about whether if the far right is actually far right, and if the nazis were so, but it's ultimately pointless.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vecr, UnsufficentBoobage, Flexo and 2 others
Ewan McGregor said:
Wikipedia editors would actually expand the amount of things and people described as far right to ridiculous levels if there wasn't some autists there preventing them from doing so.
Click to expand...
"If you're not with us, you're against us far-right!" - SJWs, probably

And there's some propaganda-ish move going on there by lumping current conservative sources with the Nazi Party as "far-right" too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt and UERISIMILITUDO
ToroidalBoat said:
"If you're not with us, you're against us far-right!" - SJWs, probably

And there's some propaganda-ish move going on there by lumping current conservative sources with the Nazi Party as "far-right" too.
Click to expand...

What conservative stances are we allowed to have at all these days? Perhaps protesting a bit about reckless spending and debt enslaving?
 
  • Feels
  • Horrifying
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Vecr, scathefire, Flexo and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back