- Joined
- Aug 13, 2022
That's a racist dog whistle.reckless spending
And that's just straight up mask off racism.debt enslaving
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a racist dog whistle.reckless spending
And that's just straight up mask off racism.debt enslaving
Ah yes, the far right Nazi's that uncritically support Israel no matter what.The Nazi Party is described by Wikipedia as being "far-right", which of course has a rather different meaning in Clown World.
(the conservative newspaper "The Epoch Times" is also described by Wikipedia as being "far-right")
You have to be all for trooning out kids...What conservative stances are we allowed to have at all these days? Perhaps protesting a bit about reckless spending and debt enslaving?
Oh they have explanations for it.Ah yes, the far right Nazi's that uncritically support Israel no matter what.
They don't have enough funding to show the message to more people.>you only had a 5% chance of seeing this message
>only 2% of people donate
Why don't they show it to more people, then?
Maybe they see it as some kind of bullying. Making fun of a 41 year old tranny usually will get them mad. Remember, a lot of wiki editors have the same mindset as Redditors.Can someone explain why Wikipedia has such a weird aversion to anything to do with CWC?
Or, alternatively, the discussion has been moved here:Lol, that Holodomor denier that was on this thread earlier deleted all of his posts.
It kind of tramples all over the very concept of the Nazis being sui generis and "ontologically evil" if they're just "far right" just like everything else the propagandists at Wikipedia don't like. If they're all just exactly the same anyway why should we even care about Nazis?There is a lot of autism and debate to be had about whether if the far right is actually far right, and if the nazis were so, but it's ultimately pointless.
Montgomery Brawlthat The Fader praised "Montgomery Brawl" as "a hilarious recap" of the brawl and a "song a piece of history deserves"?
Vladimir Mitrofanovich Purishkevich (Russian: Влади́мир Митрофа́нович Пуришке́вич, IPA: [pʊrʲɪˈʂkʲevʲɪt͡ɕ]; 24 August [O.S. 12 August] 1870, Kishinev – 1 February 1920, Novorossiysk, Russia) was a far-right politician in Imperial Russia, noted for his monarchist, ultra-nationalist, antisemitic and anticommunist views. Because of his restless behaviour, he was regarded as a loose cannon. At the end of 1916, he participated in the killing of Grigori Rasputin.
Literally all of those are completely mainstream basic shit for a Russian nobleman in the 1900s and 1910s.
Why even have the neutral point of view rule if it's not being enforced?
Why even have the neutral point of view rule if it's not being enforced?
View attachment 5475478
Why even have the neutral point of view rule if it's not being enforced?
Only indians would care enough to edit/make cricket articles.
I love shit like this, because the original way to sell Wikipedia to normal people was to dismiss the very idea that things like this would happen over and over again. No, a bored housewife would never falsify history for years. No, a teenager could never take control of an entire language's Wikipedia despite not knowing the language. The fact that anyone can edit Wikipedia is its greatest strength.