Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

What's worse? Disney paying Wikipedia autists to keep this list from being overrepresented by Disney crap or people actually doing this for free?
They do it for free? And they aren't even officially recognized jannies? Janny labor is being outsourced and they should be concerned for their livlihood.
 
1704732477103.png
So far. Wikipedia still censoring pages of people on Epstein list. Including all mention of Stephen Hawking visiting Epstein island.
 
View attachment 5620905
So far. Wikipedia still censoring pages of people on Epstein list. Including all mention of Stephen Hawking visiting Epstein island.
Muh primery sauces.

Remember, to get onto Wikipedo, it first has to be pre-digested by paid liars pushing an agenda.
 
Why does Daniel Rigal not have a thread yet? The asshole is kinda annoying.

If I have the time and autism I might try and compile in a thread all his online spergery in 2024
Please, do https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:A_Socialist_Trans_Girl while you're at it. Responsible for this legendary explanation of breastfeeding:

And "this gender's role is to spend lots of time with babies" is a PRESCRIPTIVE statement, and not really accurate, an accurate descriptive statement would be "the time in which each gender which is typically associated with sex spends around infants is contributed to by a multitude of factors, one of said factors being that within the nuclear family structure, the parent which produces the hormones resulting in lactation, unless the milk is bottled and fed indirectly, would spend an increased time with the baby, though this is not a determinative factor, as due to the previously aformentioned bottling, non-nuclear family structures, and in addition to those, the time spend feeding "t h e i n f a n t" is not but a small portion of total time spend with "t h e i n f a n t", which the remain portion of time is undetermined by breastfeeding." THAT is an full, descriptive, objective, non-dishonest framing of it. And is not a POV.

(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Woman/Archive_25#This_article_really_needs_a_massive_overhaul.)
 
what's funny about this is it wasn't Steven hawking who visited epstein Island but another scientist that has the same first name as Steven hawking. so many idiots, my god
Stephen Hawking definitely visited Epstein's island in 2006, and this has been known since 2015. Epstein hosted a conference on gravity in the US Virgin Islands and invited some people back to his own island, including Hawking.

As to the question of what he might do, Hawking was known to have visited a swinger's club where he had naked (adult) women sit on him while he was fully clothed. I don't know what the legal situation is if (hypothetically speaking) Epstein had girls under 18 do that to him, and what changes if he was aware of their age. Obviously it's not something I'd do myself.

This isn't new information from the current round of Epstein revelations, but rather something I read in the book Hawking Hawking by Charles Seife and looked up the sources.
 
From The Generation Alpha Wikipedia Page anticipating a soy based generation who will fight for the extinction rebellion.
View attachment 5536016
Since when was Wikipedia supposed to be home to shitty predictions, rather than documentable information? At least most of the shit on the site, even if horribly biased, is in the past tense. Did they do this with zoomers?
 
From The Generation Alpha Wikipedia Page anticipating a soy based generation who will fight for the extinction rebellion.
The way the left been shilling for Hamas and Muslims. Especially in Canada and Europe. And by LGBT and BLM in United States. Odds are better Gen Alpha will be fighting for sharia law.
Since when was Wikipedia supposed to be home to shitty predictions, rather than documentable information?
1705223816556.jpeg
1705223838532.jpeg
Nearly every global warming cultists prediction on Wikipedia dead wrong. Especially from Al Gore.
 

Impressive. Very nice. Lets see their articles on American and European internet brigades, like the literal state sponsored ones from the British Army PSYOPS division or the professional concern trolls of the US State Department.

View attachment 5634561
View attachment 5634562
Nearly every global warming cultists prediction on Wikipedia dead wrong. Especially from Al Gore.

Reminder that establishment faggots shilled so fucking hard for Al Gore and his retarded PowerPoint to try and give us a 3rd Clinton term that they gave him a Nobel prize over it. In hindisight Obama winning it 9 years later for not being Bush and having teflon skin was a forgone conclusion.
 
Nearly every global warming cultists prediction on Wikipedia dead wrong. Especially from Al Gore.
This is a good resource:
A graveyard of failed predictions of climate catastrophes. (Scroll down past the ones that haven't expired yet.)
 
Impressive. Very nice. Lets see their articles on American and European internet brigades, like the literal state sponsored ones from the British Army PSYOPS division or the professional concern trolls of the US State Department.
Units of paid trolls like the ones that operate from Eglin AFB (highest usage of Reddit per capita of any census designated place in the US) have articles that give neutral descriptions of their supposed missions unlike these descriptions that make them out to be Internet Hitlers.
 
View attachment 5633922
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_web_brigades
what in the goddamn fuck is this.


what's funny about this is it wasn't Steven hawking who visited epstein Island but another scientist that has the same first name as Steven hawking. so many idiots, my god
They do realize the United States as the exact same thing

The talk page on the far right is hilarious because they literally claim that there's nothing written on what the center left and the center right believe
Wikipedia editors have to be the dumbest group of people on the face of the planet

Also how is Joseph Stalin not a dictator but Hitler is
I've noticed Wikipedia does these subtle propaganda tactics where Tucker Carlson is a commentator not a journalist the same with Pat Buchanan
Yet people like Rachel Maddow or journalists
Both people have done journalism
When Trump got elected did everyone just collectively lose their minds cuz it's feeling more and more like that is the years go on
 
I've noticed Wikipedia does these subtle propaganda tactics where Tucker Carlson is a commentator not a journalist the same with Pat Buchanan
Yet people like Rachel Maddow or journalists
Both people have done journalism
Wikipedia's coverage of these topics is indeed quite bad, but Tucker is certainly called a journalist:
tucker-j.png

tucker-j2.png

Pat Buchanan is similarly categorized.

It's true the lead doesn't call either journalists, but the same is true of Rachel Maddow:
maddow1.png

And in fact, unlike Tucker, it's not listed in her occupations:
maddow2.png
 
Back