Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
He considered himself a follower of the original Marxism-Leninism, but he definitely introduced enough new concepts in his critiques of Soviet Communism in The Revolution Betrayed that I think it's reasonable to call people who follow him specifically Trotskyists or Trotskyites.
The only good thing Stalin did was have an ice ax smashed through that bastard's skull.
 
Screenshot_52.png
Screenshot_53.png

He's a time traveling wizard how does Josh do this I mean isn't that pretty basic information like when the site was started
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hold on, so they can cite traffic numbers using the sites administration but they can't check Null's profile and see that it says 2012?
They're Wikipedos. They lie. The whole idea that this is an "encyclopedia" is a lie.

It is a fake encyclopedia.

It is a propaganda outlet.
 
They don't even get basic uncontroversial facts right. For instance, the article says
Kiwi Farms was originally called "CWCki Forums" before "Kiwi Farms" was coined in 2014, with "Kiwi Farms" being a misspelling of the old site name.

"Kiwi Farms" was not a misspelling of the old name but reflected Chris's slurred pronunciation of CWCki Forums. This "fact" is cited to this Intelligencer article:

But the article does not say anything about a misspelling or the origin of the name at all.

Of course, this pales in comparison to how many of the juiciest (false) claims are sourced to a junk book by nobody New Zealand academic Kevin Veale.
 
View attachment 6403731
View attachment 6403732

He's a time traveling wizard how does Josh do this I mean isn't that pretty basic information like when the site was started
Too lazy to look it up, but I'm fairly certain that Null has explained that his 2012 join date comes from the fact that his account was somehow imported from the old site. And/or he created the account then but the Kiwi Farms didn't open until the following year. So Wikipedia is more or less correct. Creation of the site may have begun in 2012 but it didn't go live/public until 2013.
 
"Kiwi Farms" was not a misspelling of the old name but reflected Chris's slurred pronunciation of CWCki Forums. This "fact" is cited to this Intelligencer article:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190511184633/http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/07/kiwi-farms-the-webs-biggest-community-of-stalkers.html
But the article does not say anything about a misspelling or the origin of the name at all.
This is one on the top of the list of Stupid Wikipedo Tricks.

Make shit up, then cite a source that doesn't even say what you lied about.
Of course, this pales in comparison to how many of the juiciest (false) claims are sourced to a junk book by nobody New Zealand academic Kevin Veale.
Governments and PR firms almost certainly use Wikipedia this way, just hire some paid liar to write some bullshit, have some tranny pedophile declare it a "reliable source," then have your paid propaganda presented as being from an "encyclopedia."
 
What the fuck does this mean? Not a rhetorical question, I'm asking seriously. Please explain. What the actual fuck they meant by this? Does Beetlejuice shout nigger at Lydia?
Screenshot_20240912_015435.jpg
 
While erroneously responding to a post about someone who isn't Nick Fuentes, I found some stuff even dumber than that on Wikipedia. It's over whether he's of Mexican descent. That claim is in his Wikipedia article, and while it may or may not be true, the sources cited for it don't actually say that.

I don't know where you've got this from. He's from Bilbao.
He was born in a Chicago suburb according to a Texas Tribune article (archive).

As for the Mexican descent thing? Guess where I got that. Guess. If you guessed Wikipedia you're right and I'm a fucking retard.

According to Fuentes, he is of Mexican descent via his paternal ancestors and is Catholic.[27][28]
Wikipedo (archive)

In my defense they are, or were, usually pretty useful on that "Early Life" type stuff if you know what I mean.

So it has two cites. That would make it reliable, wouldn't it?

Neither cite says anything about Mexico or him being Mexican. The Wikipedo made that up.
(archive) (archive)

The first doesn't even mention Nick Fuentes at all, and the second says nothing about Mexican. It says "Hispanic." However, they put him in a category for Mexicans, too.

I can't find anything specifically about Bilbao, though maybe we should take it to the Fuentes thread itself, which also doesn't mention Bilbao, although you'd think it would have been mentioned there.

Incidentally, the "Fuentes has claimed to be descended from Mexican immigrants" claim appears all over the place. I think we can guess where that bullshit came from. They chose two articles that don't even say that to cite for the bogus claim on WP.
 
On the topic of really horrible Wikipedia photos check out Francis Cobain's photo
I wouldn't say she's a stunner, but that picture is so fucked up it doesn't even look like how she actually looks.

Tbh she looks like if a young Kurt had trooned out (like he would probably have done had he lived until now).
frances-kurt-cobain-1-2000-1-7d5.png
She even has his chin and cheeks, if not the cleft chin.
 
I heard that Africans were also practicing longterm abortions even after birth. Such a progressive race!

Wikipedofags might have a little drop of humour after all. A photo of a chloroform bottle right after mentioning the man has died from drinking chloroform:
Screenshot_20240914_131049.jpg
This is equal to putting a photo of a random police officer on George Floyd's page. I am expecting the same performance.
 
Back