Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

[Shaka Brah]

They also like to claim they are the descendants of Huns, Romans, Mongols, the Prophet Muhammed, etc.
There is some truth to the nation being a genetic hodgepodge, but a Turk claiming he's a mongol because his ancestor possibly got raped by a mongol carries as much weight as a Moroccan claiming he's German because his ancestor got raped by Vandals and Suebians during the fall of the Roman Empire

They'll do anything to avoid admitting they're just Khazars.

 

[Captain Hastings Official]

They'll do anything to avoid admitting they're just Khazars.

Even more embarrassing (for them): they're just Greeks.

 

[Basil II]

They'll do anything to avoid admitting they're just Khazars.

redpill me on this (((theory))) behind the turks

Even more embarrassing (for them): they're just Greeks.

 

[Shaka Brah]

redpill me on this (((theory))) behind the turks

The Khazar Khagnate was the closest Turkic group to Anatolia during the Byzantine period. They basically just invaded after the collapse and pretended they were Greek.

 

[Basil II]

The Khazar Khagnate was the closest Turkic group to Anatolia during the Byzantine period. They basically just invaded after the collapse and pretended they were Greek.

khazars were dicking around in the ukraine and got double teamed by Russia and the Romans tho.

 

[Shaka Brah]

khazars were dicking around in the ukraine and got double teamed by Russia and the Romans tho.

Their territory was pretty wide-spread since they were semi-nomadic, which is why so many modern nations in that area trace some of their lineage back to the Khaganate. They lived on both the north side and the south side of the Black Sea, and prior to the fall of the Byzantine Empire had acted as sort of a buffer state for them.

 

[Basil II]

Their territory was pretty wide-spread since they were semi-nomadic, which is why so many modern nations in that area trace some of their lineage back to the Khaganate. They lived on both the north side and the south side of the Black Sea, and prior to the fall of the Byzantine Empire had acted as sort of a buffer state for them.

common consensus has the roaches descended from the seljuks though.

 

[Shaka Brah]

common consensus has the roaches descended from the seljuks though.

Seljuk Beg had sons with Jewish names. I ain't saying it's concrete evidence of a connection, but: Israel, Michael, Moses, Joseph, and Jonah? There's a serious theory of Khazar Jewish cultural origin for his family before their conversion to Islam.

 

[Basil II]

Seljuk Beg had sons with Jewish names. I ain't saying it's concrete evidence of a connection, but: Israel, Michael, Moses, Joseph, and Jonah? There's a serious theory of Khazar Jewish cultural origin for his family before their conversion to Islam.

the worst realization must be for a turk to realize he's a mix between a greek and a jew.

 

[Big Brown Schlub]

Even more embarrassing (for them): they're just Greeks.

They're more of a hodgepodge of different genetics, I mean don't forget that their jannies were abducted Christian boys who were indoctrinated into becoming elite Muslim soldiers of the Ottomans. Eventually they were allowed to marry and cuck the Turks with their BWCs. They may be Muzzies who were indoctrinated into being good Muslim Turks, but genetically they were still mostly from SE Europe.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

Wikipedia is a good educational tool for one purpose at this point. I think kids should actually be assigned a Wikipedia article and told to fact-check its citations so they can realize that just because a Wikipedia article cites shit doesn't mean the source actually says what the autistic piece of shit who wrote the article claims, or that the source is even worth anything. Encyclopedias in general, even the best like Britannica, should never be viewed as authoritative.

One difference though is shit in Britannica is probably written by someone with an education, while shit on Wikipedia is probably written by some autistic piece of shit in a basement.

This reminds me of the "drama" surrounding the wiki page of actress/model "Karina Lombard". Apparently she was born in Tahiti, French Polynesia and claimed her father was a "Swiss-Russian aristocrat" and that her mother was a member of the "Lakota tribe". She even claimed to be an Amerindian and played several Native characters. But her Wikipedia article never said this. They cited her interviews, but instead listed her as having several different ethnic backgrounds not related to her own claims. But the one thing that was consistent was that they usually removed the claims of her being part Native/Lakota for being suspected bullshit, although one user kept adding that info and I think other users just stopped giving a shit.

Seems like most of those users fail at basic reading comprehension. I have seen users get warnings for adding false/misleading info that doesn't match up to the source on other pages, but no one gave a shit about her page.

This turned out to be a load of bullshit, and in actuality, her father was French, and her mother was Polynesian, which explained why she was born in Tahiti. I don't know why she falsified her family background and continued to keep up the lie. Maybe the fashion/entertainment industry thought it would be "better"? Her supposed nephew edited her Wikipedia page to "clarify" this, and later the edits were removed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karina_Lombard

Apparently there were marriage records of her parents on the genealogy site "FamilySearch" and the page now has a note saying this. I made an account to the site years ago and out curiosity/boredom, decided to search the website. The claims are legit and there is a marriage record that the site obtained with those exact names listing several of her siblings as the couples children.

Though I'm not sure if a genealogy website would be an "accepted" source (not like the people editing her page even care).

 

[discombobulate]

This reminds me of the "drama" surrounding the wiki page of actress/model "Karina Lombard". Apparently she was born in Tahiti, French Polynesia and claimed her father was a "Swiss-Russian aristocrat" and that her mother was a member of the "Lakota tribe". She even claimed to be an Amerindian and played several Native characters. But her Wikipedia article never said this. They cited her interviews, but instead listed her as having several different ethnic backgrounds not related to her own claims. But the one thing that was consistent was that they usually removed the claims of her being part Native/Lakota for being suspected bullshit, although one user kept adding that info and I think other users just stopped giving a shit.

Seems like most of those users fail at basic reading comprehension. I have seen users get warnings for adding false/misleading info that doesn't match up to the source on other pages, but no one gave a shit about her page.

This turned out to be a load of bullshit, and in actuality, her father was French, and her mother was Polynesian, which explained why she was born in Tahiti. I don't know why she falsified her family background and continued to keep up the lie. Maybe the fashion/entertainment industry thought it would be "better"? Her supposed nephew edited her Wikipedia page to "clarify" this, and later the edits were removed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karina_Lombard

View attachment 1664009
View attachment 1664020
View attachment 1664021
Apparently there were marriage records of her parents on the genealogy site "FamilySearch" and the page now has a note saying this. I made an account to the site years ago and out curiosity/boredom, decided to search the website. The claims are legit and there is a marriage record that the site obtained with those exact names listing several of her siblings as the couples children.

Though I'm not sure if a genealogy website would be an "accepted" source (not like the people editing her page even care).
View attachment 1664029

"Swiss-Russian aristocrat" is a weird claim to make. Swiss nobility hasn't been a legal matter since 1848 and there weren't many ties between Switzerland and Imperial Russia outside of the Napoleonic Wars. There only started to be notable Russians in Switzerland after 1848 when socialist/republican Russians started fleeing to Switzerland, so they weren't aristocrats.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

"Swiss-Russian aristocrat" is a weird claim to make. Swiss nobility hasn't been a legal matter since 1848 and there weren't many ties between Switzerland and Imperial Russia outside of the Napoleonic Wars. There only started to be notable Russians in Switzerland after 1848 when socialist/republican Russians started fleeing to Switzerland, so they weren't aristocrats.

And "Lombard" is a pretty common surname with no noble family (AFAIK) bearing said surname. A lot of claims of her life story seem dubious, and I know there was discussion on the legitimacy of her own claims, as well as a bunch of other stuff her page claimed that had no sources.

Upon further searching, supposedly, one of her first modelling jobs was a "Native American inspired" photoshoot. So I suspect that an agent or PR team decided to "glamorize" her origins. Recently she played the historical Native figure "Nonhelema" in a tv show and I don't think she's ever played any Polynesian roles. Even though she actually is half Polynesian.

 

[soy_king]

Just remember, Britbong plebes, that according to Wikipedia, your desire for exclusive access to your fishing waters is irrelevant because the industry's worth less than Harrods.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Just remember, Britbong plebes, that according to Wikipedia, your desire for exclusive access to your fishing waters is irrelevant because the industry's worth less than Harrods.

View attachment 1664761

Food is obviously less important to a nation than accommodating 100 rich kikes who don't pay taxes.

 

[discombobulate]

Just remember, Britbong plebes, that according to Wikipedia, your desire for exclusive access to your fishing waters is irrelevant because the industry's worth less than Harrods.

View attachment 1664761

I actually read that article because it wasn't very clear what it was about. I learned that French fishermen are planning on throwing hissy fits, illegally fishing in UK waters and blockading ports. I'm not sure why anyone tolerates the French.

 

[AnOminous]

Just remember, Britbong plebes, that according to Wikipedia, your desire for exclusive access to your fishing waters is irrelevant because the industry's worth less than Harrods.

View attachment 1664761

And I suppose Britain's millennium long maritime history is absolutely irrelevant to this because wypipo have no culture or some shit.

I actually read that article because it wasn't very clear what it was about. I learned that French fishermen are planning on throwing hissy fits, illegally fishing in UK waters and blockading ports. I'm not sure why anyone tolerates the French.

Sink a few of their boats, those little bitches will be putting up white flags in no time.

 

[Clockwork_PurBle]

Today I discovered that Wikipedia has a NSFW page on fisting.

That...activity has always sounded so absurd to me, and when I heard someone make a joke about it in a video I wondered, "Wondered if anyone has died from this and had their name plastered everywhere," and voila Wikipedia article.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Today I discovered that Wikipedia has a NSFW page on fisting.

That...activity has always sounded so absurd to me, and when I heard someone make a joke about it in a video I wondered, "Wondered if anyone has died from this and had their name plastered everywhere," and voila Wikipedia article.

Sometimes I wonder if some porn is made just to be depraved and demoralizing.

 

[Large]

I actually read that article because it wasn't very clear what it was about. I learned that French fishermen are planning on throwing hissy fits, illegally fishing in UK waters and blockading ports. I'm not sure why anyone tolerates the French.

Based baguettes, fuck England.