Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

View attachment 5363544View attachment 5363545
If Wikipedia was an honest source of concentrated autism this would be a good edit I don't think there were many slavic members of the NSDAP, I don't even think they could join, however we know why this change is being made
Stolen from twitter
But I was informed that if 10 people sit at a table with a nazi, you have 11 nazis.

So... if the entire government gives a standing ovation to a nazi... the logic is that Canada is now run entirely by nazis.
 
I know I am not only beating the corpse of a horse, I'm cremating its bones...but let's for the sake of curiosity have examples of how two American militias are described, from opposite sides of the political spectrum:
1695825058207.png
1695825104055.png

I dare you to show one act of terrorism committed by Atomwaffen. Protip: You can't. But due to how Wikipedia operates, its bound to repeat the leftist smears from the media. I know people aren't interested in standing up for Atomwaffen, who admittedly are bad but not for the reasons in the article, so I guess I'll take a Voltairean position on this. AWD just smoke meth and magdump in the forest, in any country with a real media not interested in fanning the flames of Nazi Panic they would be ignored completely. RR is also connected to countless of cases of antifa violence and firearms violations but you won't read about it in Wikipedia. Probably more violent than Atomwaffen tbh.
If Wikipedia was an honest source of concentrated autism this would be a good edit I don't think there were many slavic members of the NSDAP, I don't even think they could join, however we know why this change is being made
Fun fact, the guy who's supposed to have orchestrated the Holocaust, Odilo Globocnik, was himself a Slovene, I think.
 
Last edited:
The entire thing has been designed to reinforce the "consensus" from the start. Wikipedia made the mistake of thinking that consensus couldn't just be manipulated and fucked with because of "it can't happen here" hubris, especially given the landscape of post-9/11 but pre-2008 economic crisis USA and Europe mentality of thinking we were beyond political instability in the so called "1st World" because even in the deepest points of Bush Derangement Syndrome and height of Smug Liberalism the threats of people like creationists and evangelicals were never even close to actually harming the fabric of society in the same way commies are doing now.

It really is quite sad. Once you know what to look for it is trivial to identify the NPC triggers and manufacture of consent in these articles.
 
RR is also connected to countless of cases of antifa violence and firearms violations but you won't read about it in Wikipedia. Probably more violent than Atomwaffen tbh.
I thought Redneck Revolt practically didn't exist since rednecks and rural white people aren't interested in joining a glorified Antifa group and even when Antifa does gun crime they just use the John Brown Gun Club name. Then again, Atomwaffen are like half feds and half retards and pretty much only exist because the media hypes them up as the most evil group in existence or whatever.
Fun fact, the guy who's supposed to have orchestrated the Holocaust, Odilo Globocnik, was himself a Slovene, I think.
And one of the biggest SS war criminals was Erich von dem Bach, whose name before he got involved with the Nazis was Erich von Zelewski. There were many people of Slavic background in the SS and Nazi Party. Supposedly even Hitler himself was a Slav (the original surname may have been Hidlarcek and his great-grandfather's middle name was Nepomuk, a Czech saint).
 
I thought Redneck Revolt practically didn't exist since rednecks and rural white people aren't interested in joining a glorified Antifa group and even when Antifa does gun crime they just use the John Brown Gun Club name.
More accurately Carpetbagger Revolt, doubt they have an authentic redneck between them. Lowkey they're jealous of the blue collar cred of an average Klansman.

Then again, Atomwaffen are like half feds and half retards and pretty much only exist because the media hypes them up as the most evil group in existence or whatever.
Atomwaffen is just functionally a fedposting group, no one has ever shot or killed anyone, all the supposed kills listed in the article aren't even connected to Atomwaffen activism, or there's like multiple degrees of removal. The actual rapes and human sacrifices are committed by the Order of Nine Angles, which is a genuinely fucked up and evil group.

And one of the biggest SS war criminals was Erich von dem Bach, whose name before he got involved with the Nazis was Erich von Zelewski. There were many people of Slavic background in the SS and Nazi Party. Supposedly even Hitler himself was a Slav (the original surname may have been Hidlarcek and his great-grandfather's middle name was Nepomuk, a Czech saint).
Yeah, Hitler's chauffeur Erich Kempka was a Pole too...as was SS-Colonel Joachim Mrugowsky who led the SS Racial Hygiene Institute, ironically enough.
 
Wasn't one of the biggest Attomwaffen commander/leaders litteral a 12yo boy from Estonia shitposting on his discord?

Also IIRC Himmler had some noble blood from old Bavarian nobility, so having Czech ancestors kinda tracks and fits in. Despite all the scaremongering Nazism was not as unified as many people seem to think, and you had massive divergences on opinions and positions on the status of non-aryans and such issues. You had more "red" nazis who leaned towards National Bolshevism and more Meritocratic ones and real heavy on pagan occult LARP ones and so on.
 
Wasn't one of the biggest Attomwaffen commander/leaders litteral a 12yo boy from Estonia shitposting on his discord?
Ive seen it claimed, but I think he was a patsy for Ruuben Kaalep, siegepilled EKRE politician. The 13yo ran the Telegram but Kaalep organized the firearms drills etc actual activism.
 
This is a strange article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton%27s_Cafeteria_riot

Basically, this is supposed to be the tranny Stonewall, but after reading it, I am starting to doubt this single event even happened, or if it did, it's several minor fights conflated in a single 'riot'.

The Compton's Cafeteria riot occurred in August 1966 in the Tenderloin district of San Francisco. The riot was a response to the violent and constant police harassment of drag queens and trans people, particularly trans women. The incident was one of the first LGBT-related riots in United States history, preceding the more famous 1969 Stonewall riots in New York City.[note 1] It marked the beginning of transgender activism in San Francisco.[1]

The Compton's Cafeteria riot began on an August night of 1966, the month directly following the July Vanguard picket. The exact date is unknown because there was no media coverage at the time and San Francisco's 1960s police records no longer exist.

If you check the sourcing, almost all of it goes back to a single source, a documentary from 2005, or sources that are circular back to the docu.

When one of the cops grabbed and attempted to arrest a trans woman, she threw a cup of coffee in his face.[5] According to the director of Screaming Queens, Susan Stryker, the cafeteria "erupted".[7][14] Patrons also said that they threw many items such as sugar shakers, tables, and dinnerware at the police and at the windows, causing them to shatter. They also hit the cops with their purses and high heels. In order to request backup, the police retreated into the streets, where the fighting continued. The protesters damaged a police car and burned down a sidewalk newsstand.[7][5] The police responded by fighting back, and they tried to arrest the protesters and load them into paddy wagons.

Burning down a newsstand didn't even get a single line mention in police reports? Vague date? A couple others on the talk page had the same questions I have. There was a picketing of the restaurant in July 1966 which was documented, seems odd a violent follow up wasn't?
 
Rate me late if someone already noticed but the Wikipedia article on KF intentionally avoids mentioning Chris Chan so hard. They just say he's a webcomic artist (lol) and mention his initials:
View attachment 5404240
I know this is something we've gone over a quite a few times in this thread but was there just some behind the scenes things with the editors where they decided "We aren't ever going to let Chris Chan be mentioned on this site. End of discussion". ? Is it because of trolls trying to make articles on him and pissing off the editors or what? Chris got enough media coverage from his five nights in Barbussy to have a Wiki article be deemed "notable".
 
I know this is something we've gone over a quite a few times in this thread but was there just some behind the scenes things with the editors where they decided "We aren't ever going to let Chris Chan be mentioned on this site. End of discussion". ? Is it because of trolls trying to make articles on him and pissing off the editors or what? Chris got enough media coverage from his five nights in Barbussy to have a Wiki article be deemed "notable".
It's because they're reality denying reality deniers who are literally addicted to denying reality. They've openly admitted they're totally okay with falsely accusing people (us) of murder (of Byuu) and it doesn't even matter if it's true or not so long as it's "consensus."

They've just decided Chris-Chan doesn't exist, that's their "consensus," so he doesn't. I assume if he assassinated the President they'd still refuse to make an article on it.
 
Rate me late if someone already noticed but the Wikipedia article on KF intentionally avoids mentioning Chris Chan so hard. They just say he's a webcomic artist (lol) and mention his initials:
View attachment 5404240
They have a filter set up which flags, or perhaps outright blocks, any edits mentioning Chris Chan. I imagine the awkwardness in the KF article is an attempt at working around the block.
 
I know this is something we've gone over a quite a few times in this thread but was there just some behind the scenes things with the editors where they decided "We aren't ever going to let Chris Chan be mentioned on this site. End of discussion". ? Is it because of trolls trying to make articles on him and pissing off the editors or what? Chris got enough media coverage from his five nights in Barbussy to have a Wiki article be deemed "notable".
Its weird they will have articles for absolute nobodies noone has ever heard of, and then refuse to have articles of people like Chris who is possibly the most documented person in history
 
Back