It is instructive to compare their policy that conviction at trial is absolute truth with other controversial cases.
Mumia Abu-Jamal (Wesley Cook) is the opposite situation, a black man convicted of killing a white cop. His guilt is clear, but the article is happy to share doubts about and criticisms of his trial:
View attachment 5350069
en.wikipedia.org
Mumia writes books, does shows, and even has a street in Paris named after him. This article starts off calling him "a polarizing figure":
Numerous commentators have written articles raising serious issues with the St. Floyd trials (
Example), but those apparently count for nothing.
For an older case, consider Hurricane Carter, a black boxer who was convicted of the murder of three white people. The evidence against him was compelling, but after decades of exhaustive appeals, he won the right to a new trial. Prosecutors decided that trying him again after so long (key witnesses were dead) was not practical and so dropped the case. Does this mean he's innocent?
View attachment 5350079
Wikipedia declares unambiguously that he was "wrongfully" convicted.