- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
AKSHUALLY CHUD THOSE WERE STRAY CATS NOT PETS AND FROM A DIFFERENT TOWN RIGHT NEXT TO SPRINGFIELD DEBOOONKED!
Wikipedos deserve the bullet.
Wikipedos deserve the bullet.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
Turns out all that shit about abortions in Africa was put by this one guy:
He even got a star for it! (random.txt material?)
He even got a star for it! (random.txt material?)
Last edited:
JohnnyG
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
Is there any way to get a message to the troon(s) that I was unaware of Sinfest, but thanks to their troonish kvetching and attempted censorship, I am now not only enjoying the comics, but also sharing them with normies (and as we all know, laughter is the gateway to fashism).
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2013
On a similar note, shortly after the Presidential Debate, some soy edited the Haitan mud cookie entry to mention how "only children and pregnant women actually eat these." Curious timing!
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
"But then so does, how does communism deal with the fact that people can decline consent, right? At the end of the day is not a woman's body. The highest all means of production. You know, if you want to seize the means of production that is controlled by one cast of people, so that other casts that people cannot freely access it. Well at that puts women in a very precarious position. Because they are born as a group of people. We have access to a resource, one of the most critical resources in society that another group of people is not born with. Therefore, they are born with intrinsic privilege." -Malcolm Collins
Women should maybe realize seizing the means of production includes their means of producing more workers.
SpergioLeonne
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2022
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
SJW niggers often talk about "erasure" when a video game doesn't have enough fat black bull dykes. But I think I finally came across something that really fits the bill. Whites are not a race, apparently.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1215#Page_Rejected
Not particularly interesting, perhaps, but Wiki Teahouse (playpen for newbies) archives, all 1300 pages, consist 80% of Pajeets asking "sar pls accept my article about myself I am veery important in India pls".
A Jew accuses Wiki user of Holocaust denial for saying jewish soap and lampshades are kinda sus fr fr
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
WarJams
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2019
Phil Magness drew attention, on Xitter, to notable plagiarist Kevin M. Kruse still being heaps butthurt that his wikipedo article mentions his plagiarism scandal in a light that he, notable plagiarist that he is, doesn't agree with. Princeton, his employer, after trying to pretend there was no scandal, were dragged kicking and screaming into "investigating" the allegations, though the investigation was predictably a farce with a pre-determined outcome to cover up for Kruse. The results of the "investigation" have not been released to this day, except for out of context excerpts from Kruse himself, swearing he is exonerated, but Kruse obviously has an interest in hiding his wrongdoing to assuage his bruised ego.
To that end, Kruse whined on BlueSky -yet another Twatter alternative for the shittiest of shitlibs- with the obvious intent to enlist simps to edit the wiki page in a way that was satisfactory to him.
The dutiful fellow travelers of wikipedo were more than happy to take up this brigading request, and went back to him wagging their tails for their attaboys.
As an aside, man BlueSky seems like it needs way more eyes looking into it. You just know there's some nasty stuff in that hugbox because they think only friendly eyes are on them.
To that end, Kruse whined on BlueSky -yet another Twatter alternative for the shittiest of shitlibs- with the obvious intent to enlist simps to edit the wiki page in a way that was satisfactory to him.
The dutiful fellow travelers of wikipedo were more than happy to take up this brigading request, and went back to him wagging their tails for their attaboys.
As an aside, man BlueSky seems like it needs way more eyes looking into it. You just know there's some nasty stuff in that hugbox because they think only friendly eyes are on them.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
136 references (as of now). Let's do my favourite wikipedo political rot comparison method: comparing the article of a recent American political event to an article of a very important chemical. Consider the ages of articles too.
Ethylene (a very important petrochemical which is used as a feedstock for polymers) has only 58 references.
Sulfuric acid has only 57 references. That's how much attention wikipedos give to scientific and political content. This is why wikipedia will never be a real encyclopedia.
WarJams
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2019
User Animalparty touched on that point on the article's talk page how poisoned the article is with stupid citations and is basically dismissed in "forget it Jake, it's Chinatown" fashion.
These retards literally believe "moar citations = moar truthier"
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Yep, to quote someone who is actually smart "Why 100 authors? If I was wrong one would have been enough."
It's basically the way Wikipedos use to launder propaganda and win by exhaustion. Basically gish galloping. Most references are literally the same article with a few words changes by a different journo repeating the original point.
I decided to do some checking. The article on the Holocaust has about 480 references, but a lot of these are different pages of the same book which means the actual number is a lot smaller around 300 refferences. It is also a much bigger and in depth article about a 80 year old event which has already beeb analyzed to shit. And somehow this fucking 2024 presidential campaign controversy has something like 5 times as many citations and references per capita!
What about a more direct comparison with a similar controversy? Let's go back 20 years and check on the 2004 election where some Microsoft Office Word default settings triggered the autismo of thousands of typewriter experts and saved GWB's ass. The article on GWB's military service controversy is about two and a half times as large as the one about Hatians eating stray animals, but it goes into a lot more depth about both background and the back and forth of claims and issues. Unlike the Springfield article it does not end halfway through the page and instead has only a small section at the end for the citations. It provides 77 citations total. Only a little more than half. And despite that is has way more than double the information.
You do not hate wikipedos enough. These are the absolute essence of authoritarianism, the pettit tyrants of everyday life who will gladly suck on the cock of the state for scraps of cum.
It's basically the way Wikipedos use to launder propaganda and win by exhaustion. Basically gish galloping. Most references are literally the same article with a few words changes by a different journo repeating the original point.
I decided to do some checking. The article on the Holocaust has about 480 references, but a lot of these are different pages of the same book which means the actual number is a lot smaller around 300 refferences. It is also a much bigger and in depth article about a 80 year old event which has already beeb analyzed to shit. And somehow this fucking 2024 presidential campaign controversy has something like 5 times as many citations and references per capita!
What about a more direct comparison with a similar controversy? Let's go back 20 years and check on the 2004 election where some Microsoft Office Word default settings triggered the autismo of thousands of typewriter experts and saved GWB's ass. The article on GWB's military service controversy is about two and a half times as large as the one about Hatians eating stray animals, but it goes into a lot more depth about both background and the back and forth of claims and issues. Unlike the Springfield article it does not end halfway through the page and instead has only a small section at the end for the citations. It provides 77 citations total. Only a little more than half. And despite that is has way more than double the information.
You do not hate wikipedos enough. These are the absolute essence of authoritarianism, the pettit tyrants of everyday life who will gladly suck on the cock of the state for scraps of cum.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
On the talk page of the most recent Trump assassination attempt, Wikikes already trying to bury it.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Skibidi Toilet is worth a lengthy article, but not two assassination attempts against a Presidential candidate for one of the two major parties. Sure thing Wikipedo.
Also:
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2022
CIA whistleblowers commit suicide by two gunshots to the head all the time, stop being such a conspiracy theorist.
byron
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2024
This much clown world can only be explained by simulation theory.
Things Leftists believe simultaneously:
(1) "race" is not a biological concept. It's a social construct which means it is "made up" ...in the same way that red neck, metal head, swifty, yankee (i.e. northerner), yankee (i.e. baseball fan) and trans women are made up. It's an identity and/or a label, but there's nothing "real" behind it.
(2) "white" is not a race. For every other label, if you claim it (e.g. "I am a swifty because I love Taylor Swift") then the label applies and nobody gets to question you ...but for some reason, not this one.
But don't worry, you're still allowed to openly hate white people. We just want to deny them the label because we hate them.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Broke: Whites are a race, just like blacks abd asians.
Woke: Whites are not a race, because they can't be allowed a racial consciousness due to white supremacy and imperialism. Only non-whites are allowed such due to power imbalances and materialistic dialetic.
BESPOKE: Whites aren't a race because there is just no way a Russian, a Sweede, a Frenchman and a Anglo are the same "race". Human races are defined by a complex set of characteristics of which skin tone is just one factor among dozens.
Woke: Whites are not a race, because they can't be allowed a racial consciousness due to white supremacy and imperialism. Only non-whites are allowed such due to power imbalances and materialistic dialetic.
BESPOKE: Whites aren't a race because there is just no way a Russian, a Sweede, a Frenchman and a Anglo are the same "race". Human races are defined by a complex set of characteristics of which skin tone is just one factor among dozens.
Henri Barbusse
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2022
It happens so often it should be considered a natural death.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
You can't identify as white but you should be ashamed of being white. Unlike other races, White people sprung from the Earth like mushrooms, any migration or shared ethno-cultural history is just problematic nationalism.