Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Prediction: Once Trump is sworn in, Wikikes will change US form of government to dictatorship like they did with Russia.

1730906795945.png
 
It'd be nice if non-SJWs could take over Wikipedia.

Sadly it is lvery unlikely. The type of person who can keep things objective and not fall for the sort of HR politics and circlejerk that plagues wikipedia is unlikely to put as much time and effort on wikipedia as the unemployed tranny who spends 24/7 making sure that only goodthink is added to articles and coordinating their discord contacts to ban detractors by abusing site policies.
 
Still weird that they just allow hardcore pornography in there
Wikipedia does not allow hardcore pornography ie. penetrative sex or masturbation to be used on Wikipedia articles because of liability issues, if you take a look at related articles they almost exclusively feature illustrations or artwork. They naked body in general is considered encyclopedic, not pornographic. There are edge cases like naked bodies wearing sex toys without penetration that could be considered sexual content, but even their policy admits those cases are so marginal nobody has bothered writing an exhaustive policy on it yet.

Wikimedia Commons does allow them, because in theory it's meant to be a collection of permissibly licensed media to be used for anything, but it's full of people uploading their own fetish footage and there's even a blacklist of files that are blocked from being used on Wikipedia, because their owners kept readding them to articles (and probably getting off the public exposure).
 
That's basically what pidgin is. You should look up BBC Pidgin, one of the funniest sites I've ever read
"Donald Trump return to di White House go reshape US foreign policy, promising potentially radical shifts for multiple fronts as war and uncertainty dey for many parts of di world."
Why dey speak niglish instead of english
 
I happened to look at the Wikipedia page for Jeffrey Clark. He was a minor figure in the Trump cabinet, and also played a small part in some 2020 election challenges. His intro is negative but relatively normal:
clark1.png


However, the "See also" section has a strange entry:
clark2.png


"Structural evil"? What is that?
clark3.png


Okay, so what does any of that have to do with this minor political figure and lawyer?

Refs:
 
addamsf.png

This is COMPLETE bullshit. It jumbles up the TV show and movie timelines with NO REGARD for canon. Fester was Morticia's uncle on the television show, not Gomez's brother. Grandmama was Morticia's mother in the movies. A bunch of characters listed are exclusive to either the show or the movie. Mixing and matching like this is retarded. Die you faggots.
 
I happened to look at the Wikipedia page for Jeffrey Clark. He was a minor figure in the Trump cabinet, and also played a small part in some 2020 election challenges. His intro is negative but relatively normal:
View attachment 6617289

However, the "See also" section has a strange entry:
View attachment 6617291

"Structural evil"? What is that?
View attachment 6617294

Okay, so what does any of that have to do with this minor political figure and lawyer?

Refs:
Probably trying to equate him to Eichmann or other Nazi functionaries who regularly get cited as "structural evil."
 
View attachment 6617531

This is COMPLETE bullshit. It jumbles up the TV show and movie timelines with NO REGARD for canon. Fester was Morticia's uncle on the television show, not Gomez's brother. Grandmama was Morticia's mother in the movies. A bunch of characters listed are exclusive to either the show or the movie. Mixing and matching like this is retarded. Die you faggots.
"Just avoid the politics and the site is fine, bro!"
 
Probably trying to equate him to Eichmann or other Nazi functionaries who regularly get cited as "structural evil."

Structural evil sounds like post-mo talk for "We need to destroy everything so we can build our utopia"

Which is, itself, if not ontologically evil, a big door into evil.
 
Back