Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
All these banners came from a single user page. It's like a lolcow bingo sheet! See what lolcow interests and characteristics you can spot!
kOLYKU9_t_axL91CWyF0lii3T19Fhzi7mOPEguYX8zs.png
"This user does not wish to limit his or her sexual experiences by applying a label indicating a specific sexual orientation"
Well why not? She labeled herself just about everything else.
 
Saw this on the “Misogyny” article:

“Examples of famous women who spoke out about misogynistic attacks are Anita Sarkeesian, Laurie Penny, Caroline Criado Perez, Stella Creasy, and Lindy West.”

“famous women“

They lost me the second they mentioned Anita Sarkeesian.

Imagine aliens reading this and thinking Sarkeesian was a hugely influential political figure, then actually talking to people and being bemused that no one knew who she was.

The moral of the story is that Wikipedia's notability criteria are bad.
 
The moral of the story is that Wikipedia's notability criteria are bad.

I've said this before and I'll say it again. The way Wikipedia determines notability is retarded. There is no weight given to whether or not the subject has any real-world fame. It's entirely based on their approved news sources having written articles about it. If you look at that in its most positive light, that's a very idealistic view of the publishing world where you'd believe they wouldn't cover nonsense no one cares about. In reality, we know that many of the blogs they view as credible will write about anything, no matter the importance.

It's an extremely flawed system that ignores the banality, incestuous and self-promotional nature of internet publications. Web outlets don't have to cut stories because they're a newspaper or magazine that's run out of pages. There are no higher ups saying you shouldn't write a story about your friend. Useless fluff is encouraged and coupled with the significant biases of some of Wikipedia's lead editors, you get a website that doesn't really reflect reality well. The speds on Wikipedia have tried to delete JonTron's article five times. Meanwhile, a danger hair created a game no one cared about and got an article uncontested.
 
All these banners came from a single user page. It's like a lolcow bingo sheet! See what lolcow interests and characteristics you can spot!
kOLYKU9_t_axL91CWyF0lii3T19Fhzi7mOPEguYX8zs.png
hm, let's see

> Goth
> feminist
> polyamorous
> Lady Gaga Fan
> Lady Gaga WikiProject
> doesn't wish to label themselves
> Narcisism
> BDSM
> drinker
> stoner
> sees nothing wrong with the human form
> Sailor Moon fan
> supports "gender equality"
> black and red are their favorite colors
> loves cats

Holy shit we are reaching levels of lolcowery that shouldn't even be possible.
 
That blank reception section (that was included anyway with a template pointing out that it's blank) is really all you need to know.

I looked up the sales numbers for her game and was surprised to see it almost did 100,000. That's high for a danger hair project. That's because it was part of a Humble Bundle, which sold 107,000 units. At least 10,000 people bought the bundle and didn't bother to activate it. :story:
 
Saw this on the “Misogyny” article:

“Examples of famous women who spoke out about misogynistic attacks are Anita Sarkeesian, Laurie Penny, Caroline Criado Perez, Stella Creasy, and Lindy West.”

“famous women“

They lost me the second they mentioned Anita Sarkeesian.
I hope that sooner than later Anita and her clique will be recognized at the con artists they are in the eyes of a larger public and fall out of relevance once and for all. I pray for the day she will make another, fatal misstep and receive enough backlash to finally fuck off the face of the world.
Zoe_Quinn_Car_2014.jpg

This is actually the picture they used for Zoe Quinn’s article.
Hey, she doesn't look fat or triggered in this picture.. What is this?! I want the chubby Zoe, not the fake cute one white knights will flock to to defend!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_the_Barbary_lion_versus_the_Bengal_tiger_of_Simla

One of my favorites. A blow-by-blow account (using the battle infobox normally used on actual historical battles) of when some 19th century India prince decided to make a lion and tiger fight.

Related:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_versus_lion

A long-ass article comparing who would win and detailing all potential encounters of tigers and lions. Tagged for disputed neutrality, so fanboys of one of the animals must be butthurt about something.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_versus_lion

A long-ass article comparing who would win and detailing all potential encounters of tigers and lions. Tagged for disputed neutrality, so fanboys of one of the animals must be butthurt about something.

So basically a Wikipedia article that is like those whowouldwin subreddit things where people sperg about who would win, a trillion lions or the Sun?
 
An analysis and criticism of The Luck of the Irish, a Disney Channel Original Movie:

Wikipedia said:
Marxist lens[edit]
Upon losing his "lucky" gold, the protagonist, Kyle, begins to visibly shrink as his life spirals out of control[1]. This is a clear reference to the Marxist idea that those who do not hold the majority of the wealth are relatively powerless in the society in which they reside. In the end, Kyle regains his "lucky gold", rejoining the Bourgeoisie, but forever changed by his experience among the Proletariat. This fall from grace and dramatic climb up the social ladder represents the constant shift in the economic differences in Marxist theory. Like the Proletariat rising up against the Bourgeoisie, Kyle regains his lucky coin. The movie's cliffhanger represents the upcoming rebirth of this economic dystopia. The protagonist's heritage is symbolic of the Proletariat struggle among the Irish before they became an accepted part of American society in the early 20th century. The final song, "This Land is Your Land", is about the Irish integrating into the United States.

Nihilist perspective[edit]
Kyle's journey from high school athlete to leprechaun and back to high school athlete, despite being harrowing and the sole focus of the film, leaves him both physically unchanged and mentally unchanged. Modern film scholars have interpreted this journey and abandonment of the Hero Cycle Monomyth.[2] as director Hoen's subtle statement that our experience are fleeting and meaningless, ultimately leaving no measurable trace of our beings or our world as everyone eventually succumbs to nothingness[3].

Feminist perspective[edit]
On account of Kyle's mother being the driving force in the loss of his lucky gold which portrays women as not only irresponsible and incapable with dealing with dealing economic affairs, but in some interpretations as outright greedy and malicious, even toward their own offspring[4]. Kyle's mother being the source of his leprechaun genes furthers this idea that women are the root of discord within a nuclear family, hearkening back to the idea of Original Sin.
 
You can probably just delete all that since it doesn't cite any sources (sorry, the Communist Manifesto doesn't count) and violates WP:OR.
Based on the page's history it's just one guy who edited that in a few weeks ago. What puzzles me is that there have been edits since then by other users and no one has removed it. I can only assume that other editors of the page saw it as useful information which kind of says something about Wikipedia's user base even if it is a minor article.

I just kind of leave weird or obviously factually incorrect edits people stick in alone out of curiosity in seeing how long it will take someone to fix it. I very rarely bother to edit anything on Wikipedia because it doesn't seem worth it.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, a danger hair created a game no one cared about and got an article uncontested.
Nina Freeman has had articles written about her in Edge and GamesTM probably the two most legit gaming publications outside of industry journals. Her wikipedia page does contain references to the Guardian (lol) and the Washington Post (lol). She's hardly Kim Swift or Jade Raymond but she's somewhat notable in the indie games scene.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonetta_(musician)

How the fuck are there pages and pages of garbage about useless completely irrelevant morons like John Flynt and Anita Sarkeesian and Tonetta has this stub?
Don't forget they're con artists. They make themselves look more important than they appear to be through their bullshit, and it pushes their followers to create that kind of garbage because they seem so relevant. I'd not even be surprised if one or the other asked someone to edit the article.
 
Back