Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

1608086211269.png

"Meg Sneed (Formely Chuck)"
NIGGA WHAT :story:

The sneedposting remains to this day, so dab on them Wiki jannies
1608086693041.png

>>127777777 动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Sneed 六四天安門事件 >>136666666 重複的號碼 The Sneed Ban of 2019 天安門大屠殺 The Simpsons General Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Janny Struggle 大躍進政策 Comfy Simpsons Thread 文化大革命 The Great Sneedposter Cultural Revolution


edit: added archive of the page at this very moment, anyway, kinda redundant, as wikipedia saves copies of virtually every edit, but better safe than sorry
 
Last edited:
A couple weeks late, but if people were wondering, I saw a Wiki page cite an article by "Steven Sailer". I forgot the exact page or what article he wrote, but it was something from the 2000s. This is his own lede on Wikipedia:
"Steven Ernest Sailer is an American paleoconservative journalist, movie critic, blogger, and columnist. He is a former correspondent for UPI and a columnist for Taki's Magazine and VDARE, a website associated with white supremacy, white nationalism, and the alt-right. He has a history of making racist statements and has been described as a white supremacist by the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Columbia Journalism Review and writes about race relations, gender issues, politics, immigration, IQ, genetics, movies, and sports. As of 2014, Sailer ceased publishing his personal blog on his own website and shifted it to the Unz Review, an online publication founded by former businessman Ron Unz that promotes anti-semitism, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories, and white supremacist material."
I was kind of suprised that they'd use an article written by what Wikipedia describes as being an "alt-right, white supremacist who writes for a website that promotes anti-semitism, Holocaust denial and other conspiracy theories". Then I remember that Wikipedia is one big joke.
 
Last edited:
I was kind of suprised that they'd use an article written by what Wikipedia describes as being an "alt-right, white supremacist who writes for a website that promotes anti-semitism, Holocaust denial and other conspiracy theories". Then I remember that Wikipedia is one big joke.
If it affirms their biases, they'll cite anyone.
 
I always thought it was stupid that many Wikipedia articles about Americans/Canadians, etc with Chinese heritage have a redundant footnote reminding you that their surname is [insert Chinese surname here]. I know this is done to avoid confusion because in China surnames go first, but many of the people in question are Americans or whatever and obviously have their family names go last.
 
This is the Wikipedia profile picture for War Machine, aka the MMA guy who beat Christy Mack, his ex-girlfriend, to within an inch of her life.

war machine wikipedia.png


Could they seriously not get a photo where he's actually looking at the camera? If you didn't know what he looked like, this doesn't communicate anything besides the fact he's got at least one neck tattoo.
 
This is the Wikipedia profile picture for War Machine, aka the MMA guy who beat Christy Mack, his ex-girlfriend, to within an inch of her life.

View attachment 1817397

Could they seriously not get a photo where he's actually looking at the camera? If you didn't know what he looked like, this doesn't communicate anything besides the fact he's got at least one neck tattoo.
I'm sure it was to help future detectives find his identifying marks.
 
Could they seriously not get a photo where he's actually looking at the camera? If you didn't know what he looked like, this doesn't communicate anything besides the fact he's got at least one neck tattoo.
They're really anal about copyrights and it could just be this is the only picture they had that they're sure is public domain, or the person who took it actually uploaded it and gave them permission. I also think they punish celebrities who don't give them a picture or have someone give it to them by picking the ugliest, dumbest looking picture they can find.
 
She wants that BCC for sure.
Big Chinese Cock? That only exists metaphorically. Just because the CCP fucks countries really hard doesn't mean Chang will do the same to her.

Of course she owns multiple cats and advertises that fact on her admin page. They're your editing companions? They're probably your fact checkers and ethics advisors too.
 
I'm utterly unconvinced that the whole "boogaloo boi" thing isn't a psyop made to get dumbasses to dress in distinctive clothing and be violent so that they can get arrested. Same with the "boogaloo movement", these things are exonyms that didn't really exist (at least not in the same way) until the left-of-center MSM started pushing the idea.
 
I'm utterly unconvinced that the whole "boogaloo boi" thing isn't a psyop made to get dumbasses to dress in distinctive clothing and be violent so that they can get arrested. Same with the "boogaloo movement", these things are exonyms that didn't really exist (at least not in the same way) until the left-of-center MSM started pushing the idea.
It's utter bullshit. This article is complete trash and really reminiscent of the kind of shit ignorant old people used to write about "drug culture" where it's obvious they have no idea what they're talking about. Boogaloo is just a term used on /pol/ and its offshoots to refer to any big violent happening, as a joke or otherwise. Like [Whatever] 2: Electric Boogaloo. It's really on the level of "the OK sign is a white supremacist symbol" in terms of pure ignorance. And this is supposed to be an "encyclopedia." They're currently begging for money too for absolute nonsense like this.
 
It's utter bullshit. This article is complete trash and really reminiscent of the kind of shit ignorant old people used to write about "drug culture" where it's obvious they have no idea what they're talking about. Boogaloo is just a term used on /pol/ and its offshoots to refer to any big violent happening, as a joke or otherwise. Like [Whatever] 2: Electric Boogaloo. It's really on the level of "the OK sign is a white supremacist symbol" in terms of pure ignorance. And this is supposed to be an "encyclopedia." They're currently begging for money too for absolute nonsense like this.
Imagine donating to wikipedia so the CEO can make his $300k salary while a collection of trannies attempt to distort reality with "authoritative sources".
 
Back