Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

[DrNow]

I also made it clear that as we fight for LGBTQIA+ rights, we must do so in full solidarity with BIPOC activists, union workers, abortion rights activists, & more.
Our struggles—while unique—are all in resonance with one another. And when we stand together, we uplift all of us.

But not people who don’t believe Tony is a lesbian, we don’t uplift them.

 

[Geranium]

But not people who don’t believe Tony is a lesbian, we don’t uplift them.

It's a real Fisher-Price understanding of politics, the idea that you want to lump lots of (very contentious!) matters together, and everyone will march forwards arm-in-arm to some rainbow future.

The most successful political campaigns are waged on issues where you can form consensus. Why on earth, for example, would trade unionists want to sabotage an organising drive for things like better pay by hitching themselves to extremely controversial subjects such as transgenderism? You'd just be voluntarily alienating people who would otherwise support you.

Edit: Though I guess it is a favourite tactic of transgenderists: latch on to an established campaign and try to achieve your goals before people notice your degeneracy.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Matt Walsh gave Tony an important reality check.

 

[Geranium]

Tony's being boring, but he did tweet "Hey Arnold" Drennen's video about his new poetry collection. Didn't realise how hilarious Zachary's voice is:

So we've got extra-fake-Valley-goyle Tony, breathy-sex-offender Zac, and now Selma Bouvier impersonater not-Ari-Gold Drennen.

For reference:

 

[Palla Strozzi]

This guy's smile (weak, thin-to-no-lips, eyes staying immobile) is creepy as hell.

 

[Dr. Butt]

View attachment 5184675

I feeeeeel fantaastiiiic

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Our "legislative researcher" does not have even the slightest sense of awareness of what is at the end of the road.

 

[Marvin]

They'd either have to shoah Cardin which would go down badly with the tribe and who has never lost an election, or the great white paki, primary winner van hollen who has been being pushed since 2006 to the extent of having a special position created before he even won a position

In return they're going to be running a white dude in a dress in a heavily black district. I don't imagine the niggaz of bodymore, murderland show much love to homo thugs

If they are grooming him for Maryland then the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing, and what it's doing is pushing a glass jar up the anus

I've said this before, back when Bradley Manning was trying to unseat a Maryland senator: Maryland is a very east coast democrat state. It's run like the mafia, not like antifa west coast states. There's a pecking order here, and ugly trannies are at the bottom of it.

Maybe they could attack a house seat versus a senate seat, but I'd even be skeptical of that. Marylanders will support an established, good looking man or woman who can push for their interests in congress. They see an ugly tranny pushing batshit acab policies and tranny policies and get immediately turned off. Why would straight voters support a troon when they could support a less gross normie who'll support the tranny policies (and others) anyway?

 

[AirdropShitposts]

It's a real Fisher-Price understanding of politics, the idea that you want to lump lots of (very contentious!) matters together, and everyone will march forwards arm-in-arm to some rainbow future.

The most successful political campaigns are waged on issues where you can form consensus. Why on earth, for example, would trade unionists want to sabotage an organising drive for things like better pay by hitching themselves to extremely controversial subjects such as transgenderism? You'd just be voluntarily alienating people who would otherwise support you.

Edit: Though I guess it is a favourite tactic of transgenderists: latch on to an established campaign and try to achieve your goals before people notice your degeneracy.

They've "read" the classic Marxist works by skimming them so they got the part about there's the Bad Guys (capitalists) and the Good Guys (proletariat) and there will eventually be a big battle in which the Good Guys win and utopia happens. Since this lines up with their Christian background it makes total and complete sense. Obviously all of us Good Guys should work together to defeat the Bad Guys and have our thousand year utopia. Pointing out that our interests contradict is just the Bad Guys trying to divide us so they can defeat us! That's what they always try to do in the media I watch, so we just have to stay strong and WORK TOGETHER!

If you don't like this version, let me get you some Habermas tomes where you can trudge through the worst writing in an already horrifically bad field to learn the "scientific" truth of how everyone endlessly talking forever will somehow lead to a complete single consensus on every topic. (And that consensus will always be a false consciousness free socialism.)

I've said this before, back when Bradley Manning was trying to unseat a Maryland senator: Maryland is a very east coast democrat state. It's run like the mafia, not like antifa west coast states. There's a pecking order here, and ugly trannies are at the bottom of it.

Maybe they could attack a house seat versus a senate seat, but I'd even be skeptical of that. Marylanders will support an established, good looking man or woman who can push for their interests in congress. They see an ugly tranny pushing batshit acab policies and tranny policies and get immediately turned off. Why would straight voters support a troon when they could support a less gross normie who'll support the tranny policies (and others) anyway?

That's really all the Democratic areas, there's the occasional weirdo true believer but it's all mafia style powerful families and interests. Whole East Coast is like that, Chicago obviously, most of the West Coast is really, the weirdos in SF and Seattle and Portland have large local institutions behind them and there's always a couple of them in city councils in the East too, you don't just run insurgency candidacies from the far left and sweep control from the left/center-left absolute control. That's why they were so enraged about the "right-wing" SF recalls and the Seattle prosecutor race, the voters went outside the system. These idiots think The Squad is some kind of insurgent wave of the future that was going to immediately take over and change the party when they were minor niches in favorable situations and they've been totally irrelevant in the House peaking with AOC crying while switching her meaningless vote. They're still convinced this is the wave of the very soon to be present when the Party nominated the oldest most moderate guy and is not even challenging him in the primaries while desperately clinging to two Senators, Manchin and Sinema, that all these Twitter activists wanted thrown out of the party or maybe even thrown in prison just a couple years ago for not blindly supporting that same old moderate President on a single topic and for supporting him on another topic that the Twitter activists opposed.

The reason I would distinguish this from many Republican areas is a simple factor: time. Lots of now strong Republican areas weren't so when Tony was born, they were competitive or even Democrat controlled especially in the South. They just haven't had the opportunity to build up the kingdoms yet. Democrats have been enshrined in the cities for nearly a century. The Republican Party was severely battered all over the country in the 1930's, 1964 and 1974, they were driven out of their old strongholds. The Republican Revolution in 1994 (and in some respects Reagan earlier) was the result of a long erosion of Democrat control, even many of what we knew of as "red states" by 2004 still had regular Democratic legislatures because of the incumbency advantage.

This ties into the above, the Democratic Party was built on the New Deal and Great Society coalitions that were premised on all these interests never coming into conflict or that at least the national party apparatus could juggle these flare ups enough to maintain power. You can find all kinds of decrying from Democratic elites over decades and decades that stuff like abortion, affirmative action, culture war stuff, etc. are "wedge issues" that people need to ignore so the coalition can stay together to achieve it's true interests, which are those of the Democratic Party elite. The social justice left's contention that there can be no compromise only exacerbates this, not convinces everyone "oh yeah, we should stop caring about this stuff and do what they say." They still haven't learned any lessons from the last two Presidential elections and seem to cling even more to the idea that if they just shut everyone else up then they can just win and problem solved. This especially appeals to people like Tony and Zac because they really like people shutting up and doing as they say and also because they literally have no ideas or thoughts of their own so it benefits them to just parrot what all the other Twitter activists say on every topic rather than taking the time to, ugh, learn about it and potentially take a more informed stance that threatens their position among the Twitter activists.

 

[A1 Steak Sauce]

Tony's being boring, but he did tweet "Hey Arnold" Drennen's video about his new poetry collection. Didn't realise how hilarious Zachary's voice is:
View attachment 5184658
View attachment 5184675
So we've got extra-fake-Valley-goyle Tony, breathy-sex-offender Zac, and now Selma Bouvier impersonater not-Ari-Gold Drennen.

For reference:
View attachment 5184678

Oh boy, I sure do love 20 fucking cuts where it zooms in and out. Every recent video of Zach's is filmed in his kitchen and his man shoulders always shine through. His own angle is dead on, so he always looks the most terrifying. It will always be funny to me that he decided his new name off of the fact he went by Zach and didn't use the "-ary" of Zachary. At least he learned to purge his Twitter of older photos of himself with his name.

 

[Kees H]

So we've got extra-fake-Valley-goyle Tony, breathy-sex-offender Zac, and now Selma Bouvier impersonater not-Ari-Gold Drennen.

They all sound as flamboyantly gay men who try to LARP as women.

Oh wait, that's because they are gay men dressing up trying to be women.

 

[Marvin]

That's really all the Democratic areas, there's the occasional weirdo true believer but it's all mafia style powerful families and interests. Whole East Coast is like that, Chicago obviously, most of the West Coast is really, the weirdos in SF and Seattle and Portland have large local institutions behind them and there's always a couple of them in city councils in the East too, you don't just run insurgency candidacies from the far left and sweep control from the left/center-left absolute control.

Perhaps I phrased that wrong. I'm not saying that I don't think they have control. I assume they do. It's just that the candidates they permit to get into these seats are batshit and they'd never be permitted to do some of the goofy things they do on the west coast, on the east coast.

So like Scott Wiener and all the dumb shit he keeps pushing would never happen on the east coast. Or how Portland keeps burning down over and over, that wouldn't happen on the east coast. (Not that we don't have riots on the east coast, but I feel like there's a more concerted effort into shutting said riots down, compared to just letting shit burn and telling business owners to go fuck themselves.) Or all the laws they have legalizing outdoor sleeping in parks and public drug use and all kinds of shit like that.

I used to think Seattle was a bit more mature and functional as far as west coast cities go, but then CHOP/CHAZ happened. There goes that theory.

Or in the opposite direction, in Maryland, while we do have some dumb tranny nonsense on the books, we don't necessarily have the most damaging tranny nonsense. Like they did try to pass a tranny prison bill here, but miraculously, that failed to pass. I'm pretty sure all three (lower-4 west coast states have trannies in their women's prisons.

I guess there's AOC in NY. But she's not really in a position to do anything but bug her eyes out once in awhile and jabber about stuff.

I don't know, this is obviously my unscientific, seat-of-my-pants observations. Might be nonsense.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Not widely reported, but Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas issued an opinion today on the majority views on troons and "troon rights." Wonder what constitutional scholar Tony Reed has to say in retort.

Alito and Thomas Dissent in Kincaid v. Williams

 

[Fornicario]

The Supremes have spoken. Trannies take a massive L as the court ruled private businesses do not have to pander to freak shows. Experts are predicting a 41% jump in protests nationwide, along with a massive surge in eyeliner sales. Normies are responding to the news with complete apathy.

 

[Mayor Cody Travers]

It's just that the candidates they permit to get into these seats are batshit and they'd never be permitted to do some of the goofy things they do on the west coast, on the east coast.

I live only a bit far away from you and you are 100% right on the ball on east vs west. But I've been thinking on why that is.

I think it's what you said, maturity, but vis-a-vis society and establishment and what's the "core" part of the nation. Time for a big history lecture to try to explain it.

Spoiler: Give me your autism stickers, dammit!

The east coast, hell west to the Minnesota-to-Louisiana western border line, is ultimately "America" as we know it in its default ethnocultural makeup, for better and for worse. The biome is fertile, flat, and forested. The Mississippi River watershed's natural navigable limits end at the said border line. Outside Acadiana the first mass "European" civilian settlements in all this area were actually Americans whose homes were the east coast or first string of trans-Appalachian states depending on exact time period, and the settlement was a gradual push westward - you don't hear much talk on "Arkansan" or "Ohioan" pioneers versus say the Oregon Trail or colonization of Texas. It's all united by geography, settlement and culture: easily traveled via water or flat land even before roads or canals, still super-majority Protestant, definitely all English-speaking, and still hews tightly to the classic white supermajority vs black minority and it's ALL interwoven together. It's equivalent to the idea of "China Proper" or modern Iran vs the "Greater Iran" concept, or even smaller nations like Paris dominating the original French-speaking area of France north of the Loire before reasserting control over the rest of West Francia that spoke Arpitan or Occitan. 85% of the US population is east of the 100th meridian as well.

Meanwhile west of that.... Anglo-American settlement into places like Oregon, Texas, the Great Basin, or California were organized (Texan empresarios, the Mormon exodus), sudden ('49ers, 1843 Oregon Trail), into places not connected to the Mississippi watershed and different biomes and simply very far away, and into places that already had European settlement however light on the ground (British de-facto control of Oregon during co-dominium, Tejanos and Californios) and this distance, foreign-to-core geography, and existing peoples gave rise to some serious cultural genesis or diffusion by US standards. The southwest has big Hispanic culture pluralities or even majorities, the Mormons sought to be their own thing on purpose even if they love American idealism, and the Pacific Northwest is on the other end of the continent with still extant Amerindian influence in its daily life.

That plays out on the political front, ultimately, where westerners tend to be curiosos but rarely make serious splashes. Basic examples include the Mormon McMullen making a big splash as a Republican contender in primaries vs Trump, but that was an oddity... even historically that some "western" Presidents like Reagan and the Bushes were respectively from Illinois or Connecticut than true natives. Thus the east is where true power, money and thus CONTROL lies, and the west is valuable but peripheral to this "America Proper/Core". If the west split off then most of eastern America would shrug outside losing Pacific access, but if the west suddenly truly dominated the east in ideas or politics then something had definitely changed to make the east and all its established... everything lose control over ITSELF. A USA controlled utterly by the west would not be the USA anyone knows, for better or for worse.

 

[Marvin]

Not widely reported, but Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas issued an opinion today on the majority views on troons and "troon rights." Wonder what constitutional scholar Tony Reed has to say in retort.

Alito and Thomas Dissent in Kincaid v. Williams

Reading about the ruling, I think the Supreme Court got it right, but largely only because the DSM eliminated the loophole that excluded trannies from being ADA protected. The ADA can't exclude gender identity disorder from protection if "gender identity disorder" is no longer a diagnosis.

It's dumb technicality, but it seems to be correct.

Now this is going to set loose a whole bunch of lawsuits about what stupid shit the troons will be able to demand as a "reasonable accommodation" under the ADA.

 

[a hapless toad]

That plays out on the political front, ultimately, where westerners tend to be curiosos but rarely make serious splashes. Basic examples include the Mormon McMullen making a big splash as a Republican contender in primaries vs Trump, but that was an oddity... even historically that some "western" Presidents like Reagan and the Bushes were respectively from Illinois or Connecticut than true natives.

Hoover, Eisenhower, Truman, LBJ, Nixon, and Obama would like to have a word...

 

[Mayor Cody Travers]

Hoover, Eisenhower, Truman, LBJ, Nixon, and Obama would like to have a word...

Spoiler: More spoilered 'tism so I don't take up even more space on this topic.

I'm genuinely willing to concede Eisenhower and LBJ since they and their immediate ancestors were thoroughly westerners, so don't let it be said when holes CAN be poked in my argument.

Hoover was born in Iowa and the edge of this majority populated core I spoke of, Obama I half-concede since he was born in Hawaii but as a young adult but moved to east and made his name and career in Chicago, and Nixon himself I can concede but his parents moved in their own lifetimes to California before siring him vs my two full concessions.

I would also say this would be worth looking at American history as a whole since the west was taken in 1846-1848... and yet it took over a century to a century-and-a-half to get some Presidents into the White House from Manifest Destiny lands - native-born or not - whereas places like Tennessee and Kentucky were sending candidates (Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay respectively) merely 30 years tops after mass settlement in comparison, even some "east coast state" ones like Buchanan (PA) and Fillmore (NY) were actually born west of the Appalachians in areas usually de-facto midwestern in culture. That I think indicates how quickly my proposed core area became part of mainstream Americana and thus part of the "control/maturity" Marvin spoke on versus further west.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Rough week at the SCOTUS for our favorite legislative researcher.

1. He is not entitled to special treatment because he larps as a lesbian (Affirmative action case)

2. He cannot force people to indulge in his delusions (Christian website case)

3. He still has to pay for his prior failed larps (Student debt case)

 

[Fornicario]

Rough week at the SCOTUS for our favorite legislative researcher.

1. He is not entitled to special treatment because he larps as a lesbian (Affirmative action case)

2. He cannot force people to indulge in his delusions (Christian website case)

3. He still has to pay for his prior failed larps (Student debt case)

The last three time loser on this level was Trump. I'm personally happy that Tony is now in such rarefied company.